“平面设计:美术还是社会科学?”——传播设计中的质量问题

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jorge Frascara
{"title":"“平面设计:美术还是社会科学?”——传播设计中的质量问题","authors":"Jorge Frascara","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2022.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In 1988, I published an article on the criteria for quality in communication design. This article revisits the issues I raised: performance, rather than style, should be the determining factor in assessing quality. Today, 34 years later, I shift my focus to the current drive for simplification, to ask how this affects design processes by ignoring the complexity that characterizes human interactions with communications. Methods conceived as mechanical recipes and the promotion of quick working strategies reduce the fitness of methods and processes as the way to confront complex commercial, cultural, and social problems. The discussion touches on design practice and design education. It includes examples of design projects to support aspects of the argument. Designers should become more responsible agents, professionally, socially, and environmentally. This requires an optimal use of research-based decisions in design. The end of the article is an invitation for reflection and action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 270-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872622000223/pdfft?md5=0e22fb130cfaa10db05c7e77cbc902a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872622000223-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting “Graphic Design: Fine Art or Social Science?”—The Question of Quality in Communication Design\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Frascara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sheji.2022.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In 1988, I published an article on the criteria for quality in communication design. This article revisits the issues I raised: performance, rather than style, should be the determining factor in assessing quality. Today, 34 years later, I shift my focus to the current drive for simplification, to ask how this affects design processes by ignoring the complexity that characterizes human interactions with communications. Methods conceived as mechanical recipes and the promotion of quick working strategies reduce the fitness of methods and processes as the way to confront complex commercial, cultural, and social problems. The discussion touches on design practice and design education. It includes examples of design projects to support aspects of the argument. Designers should become more responsible agents, professionally, socially, and environmentally. This requires an optimal use of research-based decisions in design. The end of the article is an invitation for reflection and action.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 270-288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872622000223/pdfft?md5=0e22fb130cfaa10db05c7e77cbc902a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872622000223-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872622000223\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872622000223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

1988年,我发表了一篇关于通信设计质量标准的文章。本文重新讨论了我提出的问题:性能,而不是风格,应该是评估质量的决定性因素。34年后的今天,我把我的关注点转移到当前对简化的追求上,想知道这是如何影响设计过程的,因为它忽略了人类与沟通互动的复杂性。被认为是机械配方的方法和对快速工作策略的推崇,降低了方法和过程作为应对复杂的商业、文化和社会问题的方法的适应性。讨论涉及设计实践和设计教育。它包括设计项目的例子来支持论证的各个方面。设计师应该在专业、社会和环境方面成为更负责任的代理人。这就需要在设计中充分利用基于研究的决策。文章的结尾是对反思和行动的邀请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting “Graphic Design: Fine Art or Social Science?”—The Question of Quality in Communication Design

In 1988, I published an article on the criteria for quality in communication design. This article revisits the issues I raised: performance, rather than style, should be the determining factor in assessing quality. Today, 34 years later, I shift my focus to the current drive for simplification, to ask how this affects design processes by ignoring the complexity that characterizes human interactions with communications. Methods conceived as mechanical recipes and the promotion of quick working strategies reduce the fitness of methods and processes as the way to confront complex commercial, cultural, and social problems. The discussion touches on design practice and design education. It includes examples of design projects to support aspects of the argument. Designers should become more responsible agents, professionally, socially, and environmentally. This requires an optimal use of research-based decisions in design. The end of the article is an invitation for reflection and action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信