供应链中能力和灵活性约束对牛鞭效应的系统绩效影响

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Arunachalam Narayanan, Alan W. Mackelprang, Manoj K. Malhotra
{"title":"供应链中能力和灵活性约束对牛鞭效应的系统绩效影响","authors":"Arunachalam Narayanan,&nbsp;Alan W. Mackelprang,&nbsp;Manoj K. Malhotra","doi":"10.1111/deci.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Utilizing behavioral experiments involving approximately one thousand subjects, we empirically evaluate the relationship between volume flexibility and the Bullwhip Effect (BWE). We not only evaluate differences in the level of BWE, but also differences in associated system performance. We find that systems with hard capacity constraints are effective at limiting BWE, but also produce very poor customer service levels. However, systems with low levels of volume flexibility generate similar performance as fully flexible systems but do so while also generating a lower BWE. In a multi-echelon setting, we show that having partial volume flexibility at the upstream echelon helps in reducing order variance, with no significant drop in service level in the supply chain. This is particularly useful in those manufacturing environments which prefer stable orders for production planning without affecting the downstream customer service level. Counterintuitively, both experiments uncovered instances of irrational behavior where participants invoked flexibility in ways that did not always enhance system performance. In addition, these experiments also established enhancements in BWE and system performance through introduction of incremental volume flexibility into upstream echelon of a supply chain.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"53 5","pages":"783-801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12525","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System Performance Implications of Capacity and Flexibility Constraints on Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains\",\"authors\":\"Arunachalam Narayanan,&nbsp;Alan W. Mackelprang,&nbsp;Manoj K. Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/deci.12525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Utilizing behavioral experiments involving approximately one thousand subjects, we empirically evaluate the relationship between volume flexibility and the Bullwhip Effect (BWE). We not only evaluate differences in the level of BWE, but also differences in associated system performance. We find that systems with hard capacity constraints are effective at limiting BWE, but also produce very poor customer service levels. However, systems with low levels of volume flexibility generate similar performance as fully flexible systems but do so while also generating a lower BWE. In a multi-echelon setting, we show that having partial volume flexibility at the upstream echelon helps in reducing order variance, with no significant drop in service level in the supply chain. This is particularly useful in those manufacturing environments which prefer stable orders for production planning without affecting the downstream customer service level. Counterintuitively, both experiments uncovered instances of irrational behavior where participants invoked flexibility in ways that did not always enhance system performance. In addition, these experiments also established enhancements in BWE and system performance through introduction of incremental volume flexibility into upstream echelon of a supply chain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"783-801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12525\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

利用涉及约1000名受试者的行为实验,我们实证地评估了体积灵活性和牛鞭效应之间的关系。我们不仅评估了BWE水平的差异,还评估了相关系统性能的差异。我们发现,具有硬容量约束的系统在限制BWE方面是有效的,但也会产生非常差的客户服务水平。然而,体积灵活性较低的系统产生的性能与完全灵活的系统相似,但同时产生的BWE也较低。在多梯队环境中,我们表明在上游梯队拥有部分容量灵活性有助于减少订单差异,而不会显著降低供应链的服务水平。这在不影响下游客户服务水平的情况下更喜欢稳定的生产计划订单的制造环境中特别有用。与直觉相反,这两个实验都揭示了非理性行为的实例,即参与者以并不总是提高系统性能的方式调用灵活性。此外,这些实验还通过将增量容量灵活性引入供应链的上游梯队,建立了BWE和系统性能的增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System Performance Implications of Capacity and Flexibility Constraints on Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains

Utilizing behavioral experiments involving approximately one thousand subjects, we empirically evaluate the relationship between volume flexibility and the Bullwhip Effect (BWE). We not only evaluate differences in the level of BWE, but also differences in associated system performance. We find that systems with hard capacity constraints are effective at limiting BWE, but also produce very poor customer service levels. However, systems with low levels of volume flexibility generate similar performance as fully flexible systems but do so while also generating a lower BWE. In a multi-echelon setting, we show that having partial volume flexibility at the upstream echelon helps in reducing order variance, with no significant drop in service level in the supply chain. This is particularly useful in those manufacturing environments which prefer stable orders for production planning without affecting the downstream customer service level. Counterintuitively, both experiments uncovered instances of irrational behavior where participants invoked flexibility in ways that did not always enhance system performance. In addition, these experiments also established enhancements in BWE and system performance through introduction of incremental volume flexibility into upstream echelon of a supply chain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信