阅读的激情、教学法和政治

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Wyse, A. Bradbury
{"title":"阅读的激情、教学法和政治","authors":"D. Wyse, A. Bradbury","doi":"10.1080/04250494.2022.2091987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The teaching of reading has been a source of contentious debate for many years. Margaret Meek Spencer contributed her passion for the importance of specific texts to help children learn to read. In addition to the kinds of texts to be used, important aspects of the debate include the relationship between national curriculum policies and robust research evidence about what works in teaching reading. This paper notes a historical trend in government policy that has included England's Department for Education strengthening its control of the curriculum and pedagogy for teaching reading in ways which run contrary to many of Meek Spencer’s arguments. The paper examines the use of statutory assessment, particularly a Phonics Screening Check, its influence on pedagogy and links with the politics of reading. We conclude that policy needs to be reformed to better reflect robust research evidence.","PeriodicalId":44722,"journal":{"name":"English in Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"247 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The passion, pedagogy and politics of reading\",\"authors\":\"D. Wyse, A. Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/04250494.2022.2091987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The teaching of reading has been a source of contentious debate for many years. Margaret Meek Spencer contributed her passion for the importance of specific texts to help children learn to read. In addition to the kinds of texts to be used, important aspects of the debate include the relationship between national curriculum policies and robust research evidence about what works in teaching reading. This paper notes a historical trend in government policy that has included England's Department for Education strengthening its control of the curriculum and pedagogy for teaching reading in ways which run contrary to many of Meek Spencer’s arguments. The paper examines the use of statutory assessment, particularly a Phonics Screening Check, its influence on pedagogy and links with the politics of reading. We conclude that policy needs to be reformed to better reflect robust research evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English in Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"247 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2022.2091987\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2022.2091987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多年来,阅读教学一直是一个争论不休的问题。玛格丽特·米克·斯宾塞(Margaret Meek Spencer)对特定文本对帮助儿童学习阅读的重要性充满了热情。除了要使用的教材种类之外,辩论的重要方面还包括国家课程政策与关于什么在阅读教学中起作用的有力研究证据之间的关系。本文注意到政府政策的一个历史趋势,其中包括英国教育部加强对阅读课程和教学方法的控制,这与米克·斯宾塞的许多论点背道而驰。本文考察了法定评估的使用,特别是语音筛选检查,它对教学法的影响以及与阅读政治的联系。我们的结论是,政策需要改革,以更好地反映有力的研究证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The passion, pedagogy and politics of reading
ABSTRACT The teaching of reading has been a source of contentious debate for many years. Margaret Meek Spencer contributed her passion for the importance of specific texts to help children learn to read. In addition to the kinds of texts to be used, important aspects of the debate include the relationship between national curriculum policies and robust research evidence about what works in teaching reading. This paper notes a historical trend in government policy that has included England's Department for Education strengthening its control of the curriculum and pedagogy for teaching reading in ways which run contrary to many of Meek Spencer’s arguments. The paper examines the use of statutory assessment, particularly a Phonics Screening Check, its influence on pedagogy and links with the politics of reading. We conclude that policy needs to be reformed to better reflect robust research evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
English in Education
English in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信