将时间需求纳入主要时间使用的研究

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Craig Hochbein, C. Meyers
{"title":"将时间需求纳入主要时间使用的研究","authors":"Craig Hochbein, C. Meyers","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2020.1851671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For more than a century, numerous studies examined and reported how principals allocated their time. Assuming that differences in selection, participation and satisfaction of tasks by principals resulted in different outcomes, researchers have continued to study principal time use. In 1989, Wimpelberg, Teddlie, and Stringfield indicated a need for more sophisticated research of principal time use. Since then, the role of the principal has evolved and researchers have adapted methodologies to improve measurement and analyses of principal time use. Despite these developments, the predominant model of principal time use applied by researchers has remained unchanged. Most principal time use research relies on a premise that a perpetual supply of demands requires principals to make choices about how to allocate their limited time. By focusing on the time demands of principals, we identify limitations of the common model and propose alternatives. We then demonstrate how researchers could apply these models to enhance the study of principal time use, as well as discuss considerations for policy and preparation of principals.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"205 1","pages":"175 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating time demands into studies of principal time use\",\"authors\":\"Craig Hochbein, C. Meyers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2020.1851671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT For more than a century, numerous studies examined and reported how principals allocated their time. Assuming that differences in selection, participation and satisfaction of tasks by principals resulted in different outcomes, researchers have continued to study principal time use. In 1989, Wimpelberg, Teddlie, and Stringfield indicated a need for more sophisticated research of principal time use. Since then, the role of the principal has evolved and researchers have adapted methodologies to improve measurement and analyses of principal time use. Despite these developments, the predominant model of principal time use applied by researchers has remained unchanged. Most principal time use research relies on a premise that a perpetual supply of demands requires principals to make choices about how to allocate their limited time. By focusing on the time demands of principals, we identify limitations of the common model and propose alternatives. We then demonstrate how researchers could apply these models to enhance the study of principal time use, as well as discuss considerations for policy and preparation of principals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"175 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1851671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1851671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一个多世纪以来,许多研究调查并报告了校长如何分配时间。假设校长在任务选择、参与和满意度上的差异导致了不同的结果,研究者们继续研究校长的时间使用。1989年,Wimpelberg, Teddlie和Stringfield指出需要对主时间使用进行更复杂的研究。从那时起,校长的角色发生了变化,研究人员采用了各种方法来改进对校长时间使用的测量和分析。尽管有这些发展,研究人员应用的主要时间利用模型仍未改变。大多数关于校长时间使用的研究都基于一个前提,即需求的永久供给要求校长选择如何分配他们有限的时间。通过关注委托人的时间需求,我们确定了通用模型的局限性,并提出了替代方案。然后,我们展示了研究人员如何应用这些模型来加强对校长时间使用的研究,并讨论了政策和校长准备的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating time demands into studies of principal time use
ABSTRACT For more than a century, numerous studies examined and reported how principals allocated their time. Assuming that differences in selection, participation and satisfaction of tasks by principals resulted in different outcomes, researchers have continued to study principal time use. In 1989, Wimpelberg, Teddlie, and Stringfield indicated a need for more sophisticated research of principal time use. Since then, the role of the principal has evolved and researchers have adapted methodologies to improve measurement and analyses of principal time use. Despite these developments, the predominant model of principal time use applied by researchers has remained unchanged. Most principal time use research relies on a premise that a perpetual supply of demands requires principals to make choices about how to allocate their limited time. By focusing on the time demands of principals, we identify limitations of the common model and propose alternatives. We then demonstrate how researchers could apply these models to enhance the study of principal time use, as well as discuss considerations for policy and preparation of principals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Leadership & Management
School Leadership & Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.60%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信