日常数字化教育——在挪威小学实施平板电脑

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Krumsvik, Erling Berrum, L. Jones
{"title":"日常数字化教育——在挪威小学实施平板电脑","authors":"R. Krumsvik, Erling Berrum, L. Jones","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-03-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementation of tablets in Norwegian schools has become quite common, but we still have too little research knowledge about the learning outcome from these implementation measures. To achieve more knowledge about the topic, this trailing research examines the first cohort of Bærum municipality’s implementation of tablets in primary school. The outcome measures in the study are external for the intervention, and are recorded data from National Tests (National reading, arithmetic and English Tests, Classes 5, 8 and 9, National Mapping Tests for reading and arithmetic, Classes 1–3, and the 2014–2016 National Pupil Survey). The whole study (N=15,708) relies on an explanatory, sequentially mixed-methods design (Fetters, Curry and Creswell (2013), and in this study we examine the quantitative effects of this implementation. The results stemming from the general focus areas, that is, spelling, reading, comprehension and arithmetic in the National Mapping Tests for reading for Classes 1–3, we find that there is no significant impact on pupil learning1 with respect to Classes 1 and 2 at the Pilot 1 schools in 2015 and 2016, compared with the results obtained for the other Bærum schools. The same applies to Class 3, with the exception of arithmetic, where we see negative results as a consequence of being a pilot school and having used tablets. This differs to what we see in the results of the National Tests for Class 5 in 2015 and 2016, where we note significant positive outcomes with respect to arithmetic and English among boys at the pilot schools, compared with Class 5 boys at the other Bærum schools. The findings is only based on the first nine months from the implementation of tablets and therefore a second cohort of 1. In other words, the percentage above the limit for concern with respect to the expected level of learning in this context. Vol. 13, No. 3-2018, p. 152–178 ISSN ONLINE: 1891-943X 153 NORDIC JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LITERACY | VOL. 13 | NO. 3-2018 This article is downloaded from www.idunn.no. © 2018 Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). research is recommended in order to validate and elaborate on these preliminary findings.","PeriodicalId":44945,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everyday Digital Schooling – implementing tablets in Norwegian primary school\",\"authors\":\"R. Krumsvik, Erling Berrum, L. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-03-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Implementation of tablets in Norwegian schools has become quite common, but we still have too little research knowledge about the learning outcome from these implementation measures. To achieve more knowledge about the topic, this trailing research examines the first cohort of Bærum municipality’s implementation of tablets in primary school. The outcome measures in the study are external for the intervention, and are recorded data from National Tests (National reading, arithmetic and English Tests, Classes 5, 8 and 9, National Mapping Tests for reading and arithmetic, Classes 1–3, and the 2014–2016 National Pupil Survey). The whole study (N=15,708) relies on an explanatory, sequentially mixed-methods design (Fetters, Curry and Creswell (2013), and in this study we examine the quantitative effects of this implementation. The results stemming from the general focus areas, that is, spelling, reading, comprehension and arithmetic in the National Mapping Tests for reading for Classes 1–3, we find that there is no significant impact on pupil learning1 with respect to Classes 1 and 2 at the Pilot 1 schools in 2015 and 2016, compared with the results obtained for the other Bærum schools. The same applies to Class 3, with the exception of arithmetic, where we see negative results as a consequence of being a pilot school and having used tablets. This differs to what we see in the results of the National Tests for Class 5 in 2015 and 2016, where we note significant positive outcomes with respect to arithmetic and English among boys at the pilot schools, compared with Class 5 boys at the other Bærum schools. The findings is only based on the first nine months from the implementation of tablets and therefore a second cohort of 1. In other words, the percentage above the limit for concern with respect to the expected level of learning in this context. Vol. 13, No. 3-2018, p. 152–178 ISSN ONLINE: 1891-943X 153 NORDIC JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LITERACY | VOL. 13 | NO. 3-2018 This article is downloaded from www.idunn.no. © 2018 Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). research is recommended in order to validate and elaborate on these preliminary findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-03-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2018-03-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在挪威的学校中,平板电脑的实施已经变得相当普遍,但我们对这些实施措施的学习成果的研究知识仍然太少。为了获得更多关于该主题的知识,本跟踪研究考察了Bærum市在小学实施平板电脑的第一批人。研究中的结果测量是干预的外部测量,并且记录了来自全国测试(全国阅读、算术和英语测试,5、8和9年级,全国阅读和算术绘图测试,1-3年级,以及2014-2016年全国学生调查)的数据。整个研究(N=15,708)依赖于解释性的顺序混合方法设计(Fetters, Curry和Creswell(2013)),在本研究中,我们检验了这种实施的定量效应。通过对全国1 - 3年级阅读制图测试中拼写、阅读、理解和算术等一般重点领域的结果,我们发现,与其他Bærum学校相比,2015年和2016年试点1学校1年级和2年级的学生学习没有显著影响。这同样适用于3年级,除了算术,我们看到作为一所试点学校和使用平板电脑的结果是消极的。这与我们在2015年和2016年全国五年级考试中看到的结果不同,我们注意到,与其他Bærum学校的五年级男孩相比,试点学校的男孩在算术和英语方面取得了显著的积极成果。该研究结果仅基于平板电脑实施后的前9个月,因此是第二批1。换句话说,在这种情况下,高于预期学习水平的百分比。《北欧数字素养期刊》,第13卷,第3-2018期,第152-178页,ISSN ONLINE: 1891-943X 1533-2018本文下载自www.idunn.no。©2018作者。这是一篇基于知识共享CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)的开放获取文章。建议进行研究,以验证和详细说明这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Everyday Digital Schooling – implementing tablets in Norwegian primary school
Implementation of tablets in Norwegian schools has become quite common, but we still have too little research knowledge about the learning outcome from these implementation measures. To achieve more knowledge about the topic, this trailing research examines the first cohort of Bærum municipality’s implementation of tablets in primary school. The outcome measures in the study are external for the intervention, and are recorded data from National Tests (National reading, arithmetic and English Tests, Classes 5, 8 and 9, National Mapping Tests for reading and arithmetic, Classes 1–3, and the 2014–2016 National Pupil Survey). The whole study (N=15,708) relies on an explanatory, sequentially mixed-methods design (Fetters, Curry and Creswell (2013), and in this study we examine the quantitative effects of this implementation. The results stemming from the general focus areas, that is, spelling, reading, comprehension and arithmetic in the National Mapping Tests for reading for Classes 1–3, we find that there is no significant impact on pupil learning1 with respect to Classes 1 and 2 at the Pilot 1 schools in 2015 and 2016, compared with the results obtained for the other Bærum schools. The same applies to Class 3, with the exception of arithmetic, where we see negative results as a consequence of being a pilot school and having used tablets. This differs to what we see in the results of the National Tests for Class 5 in 2015 and 2016, where we note significant positive outcomes with respect to arithmetic and English among boys at the pilot schools, compared with Class 5 boys at the other Bærum schools. The findings is only based on the first nine months from the implementation of tablets and therefore a second cohort of 1. In other words, the percentage above the limit for concern with respect to the expected level of learning in this context. Vol. 13, No. 3-2018, p. 152–178 ISSN ONLINE: 1891-943X 153 NORDIC JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LITERACY | VOL. 13 | NO. 3-2018 This article is downloaded from www.idunn.no. © 2018 Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). research is recommended in order to validate and elaborate on these preliminary findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信