{"title":"体育课程干预:研究模式与干预效果综述","authors":"Baofu Wang, Senlin Chen","doi":"10.1080/00336297.2022.2032774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purposes of this literature review were (a) to describe the patterns of the existing research on physical education (PE) curriculum interventions, and (b) to determine the efficacy of these interventions. We followed a pre-established literature review protocol to search, identify, screen, and analyze the scholarship related to PE curriculum interventions. The year range of the review was between 1995 and October, 2021. This process yielded 48 articles that met the inclusion criteria, which were synthesized to address the research purposes. We calculated Cohen’s d to quantify the intervention effect sizes on several commonly studied outcomes including physical activity (PA), body composition, physical fitness, motor skill competence, knowledge and cognition, and well-being and social competence. The review revealed an increasing trend for research on PE curriculum interventions between 2009 and 2021 (n = 36) compared to the decade before (n = 12). A majority of these PE interventions involved a control group (n = 41); were conducted in North America (n = 23) and Europe (n = 15); and most were published in health (n = 19) and kinesiology journals (n = 18). The intervention effects on all outcomes combined were small to medium (d = 0.24). Effect sizes for the individual outcome variables of interest were reported separately. The findings with regard to the patterns and intervention efficacy may be useful to guide the design, execution, and evaluation of future PE curriculum interventions.","PeriodicalId":49642,"journal":{"name":"Quest","volume":"78 1","pages":"205 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Education Curriculum Interventions: A Review of Research Patterns and Intervention Efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Baofu Wang, Senlin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00336297.2022.2032774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purposes of this literature review were (a) to describe the patterns of the existing research on physical education (PE) curriculum interventions, and (b) to determine the efficacy of these interventions. We followed a pre-established literature review protocol to search, identify, screen, and analyze the scholarship related to PE curriculum interventions. The year range of the review was between 1995 and October, 2021. This process yielded 48 articles that met the inclusion criteria, which were synthesized to address the research purposes. We calculated Cohen’s d to quantify the intervention effect sizes on several commonly studied outcomes including physical activity (PA), body composition, physical fitness, motor skill competence, knowledge and cognition, and well-being and social competence. The review revealed an increasing trend for research on PE curriculum interventions between 2009 and 2021 (n = 36) compared to the decade before (n = 12). A majority of these PE interventions involved a control group (n = 41); were conducted in North America (n = 23) and Europe (n = 15); and most were published in health (n = 19) and kinesiology journals (n = 18). The intervention effects on all outcomes combined were small to medium (d = 0.24). Effect sizes for the individual outcome variables of interest were reported separately. The findings with regard to the patterns and intervention efficacy may be useful to guide the design, execution, and evaluation of future PE curriculum interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quest\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2032774\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2032774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical Education Curriculum Interventions: A Review of Research Patterns and Intervention Efficacy
ABSTRACT The purposes of this literature review were (a) to describe the patterns of the existing research on physical education (PE) curriculum interventions, and (b) to determine the efficacy of these interventions. We followed a pre-established literature review protocol to search, identify, screen, and analyze the scholarship related to PE curriculum interventions. The year range of the review was between 1995 and October, 2021. This process yielded 48 articles that met the inclusion criteria, which were synthesized to address the research purposes. We calculated Cohen’s d to quantify the intervention effect sizes on several commonly studied outcomes including physical activity (PA), body composition, physical fitness, motor skill competence, knowledge and cognition, and well-being and social competence. The review revealed an increasing trend for research on PE curriculum interventions between 2009 and 2021 (n = 36) compared to the decade before (n = 12). A majority of these PE interventions involved a control group (n = 41); were conducted in North America (n = 23) and Europe (n = 15); and most were published in health (n = 19) and kinesiology journals (n = 18). The intervention effects on all outcomes combined were small to medium (d = 0.24). Effect sizes for the individual outcome variables of interest were reported separately. The findings with regard to the patterns and intervention efficacy may be useful to guide the design, execution, and evaluation of future PE curriculum interventions.
期刊介绍:
Quest is the official journal of the National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education (NAKHE). It is the leading journal for interdisciplinary scholarship for professionals in kinesiology in higher education. Quest provides a public forum for scholarship, creative thought, and research relevant to a broad range of interests held by faculty and leaders in higher education today.
Quest publishes: 1) manuscripts that address issues and concerns relevant and meaningful to the field of kinesiology; 2) original research reports that address empirical questions that are contextualized within higher education and hold significance to a broad range of faculty and administrators in kinesiology; and 3) reviews of literature and/or research of interest to one or more sub-disciplines in kinesiology. Quest does not publish papers focused on sport (e.g., amateur, collegiate, professional) that are contextualized outside of kinesiology in higher education.