船舶机舱需要多少英语语法

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tomislav Skračić
{"title":"船舶机舱需要多少英语语法","authors":"Tomislav Skračić","doi":"10.53656/ped2023-5s.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the Faculty of Maritime Studies in Split, marine engineers have the opportunity to attend an ESP (English for Specific Purposes) course as part of the Special Education Program for Seafarers, which is a prerequisite for their career advancement. A series of surveys were carried out to detect their needs, expectations and the ways they perceive ESP teachers, courses and themselves as English language users. The responses referring to teachers were always clear and consistent – they are expected to understand essential ship engine systems and processes, concepts and contexts, etc. to produce a good learning platform. On the other hand, the responses that were supposed to help teachers to strike a balance in the ESP concept (that includes both general and vocational English) were somewhat ambiguous. Most of the respondents think that their overall command of the English language is “good” or “very good”, while their command of grammar is “good” or at least “sufficient”. Nevertheless, 94% admit that, in their case, learning grammar is “very important” or “necessary”. In the most recent survey, featuring another type of questionnaire, where the respondents were asked to break down the 50-hour ESP course into units, they allocated only 12.44 class hours for grammar (less than 25% of the course time). Further research will, hopefully, help ESP teachers to strike a reasonable balance between grammar, general English and vocational content.","PeriodicalId":44645,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogika-Pedagogy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much English Grammar is Needed in the Ship’s Engine Room\",\"authors\":\"Tomislav Skračić\",\"doi\":\"10.53656/ped2023-5s.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the Faculty of Maritime Studies in Split, marine engineers have the opportunity to attend an ESP (English for Specific Purposes) course as part of the Special Education Program for Seafarers, which is a prerequisite for their career advancement. A series of surveys were carried out to detect their needs, expectations and the ways they perceive ESP teachers, courses and themselves as English language users. The responses referring to teachers were always clear and consistent – they are expected to understand essential ship engine systems and processes, concepts and contexts, etc. to produce a good learning platform. On the other hand, the responses that were supposed to help teachers to strike a balance in the ESP concept (that includes both general and vocational English) were somewhat ambiguous. Most of the respondents think that their overall command of the English language is “good” or “very good”, while their command of grammar is “good” or at least “sufficient”. Nevertheless, 94% admit that, in their case, learning grammar is “very important” or “necessary”. In the most recent survey, featuring another type of questionnaire, where the respondents were asked to break down the 50-hour ESP course into units, they allocated only 12.44 class hours for grammar (less than 25% of the course time). Further research will, hopefully, help ESP teachers to strike a reasonable balance between grammar, general English and vocational content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogika-Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogika-Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2023-5s.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogika-Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2023-5s.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在斯普利特的海事研究学院,轮机工程师有机会参加ESP(特殊用途英语)课程,作为海员特殊教育计划的一部分,这是他们职业发展的先决条件。我们进行了一系列调查,以了解他们的需求、期望以及他们对ESP教师、课程和自己作为英语语言使用者的看法。关于教师的回答总是清晰而一致的——他们被期望理解基本的船舶发动机系统和过程、概念和背景等,以创造一个良好的学习平台。另一方面,本应帮助教师在ESP概念(包括普通英语和职业英语)中取得平衡的回答有些模棱两可。大多数受访者认为他们对英语的整体掌握是“好”或“很好”,而他们对语法的掌握是“好”或至少是“足够”。然而,94%的人承认,在他们的情况下,学习语法是“非常重要的”或“必要的”。在最近的调查中,采用了另一种类型的问卷调查,要求受访者将50小时的ESP课程分解为单元,他们只分配了12.44课时的语法(不到课程时间的25%)。进一步的研究将有助于ESP教师在语法、通用英语和职业英语内容之间取得合理的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Much English Grammar is Needed in the Ship’s Engine Room
At the Faculty of Maritime Studies in Split, marine engineers have the opportunity to attend an ESP (English for Specific Purposes) course as part of the Special Education Program for Seafarers, which is a prerequisite for their career advancement. A series of surveys were carried out to detect their needs, expectations and the ways they perceive ESP teachers, courses and themselves as English language users. The responses referring to teachers were always clear and consistent – they are expected to understand essential ship engine systems and processes, concepts and contexts, etc. to produce a good learning platform. On the other hand, the responses that were supposed to help teachers to strike a balance in the ESP concept (that includes both general and vocational English) were somewhat ambiguous. Most of the respondents think that their overall command of the English language is “good” or “very good”, while their command of grammar is “good” or at least “sufficient”. Nevertheless, 94% admit that, in their case, learning grammar is “very important” or “necessary”. In the most recent survey, featuring another type of questionnaire, where the respondents were asked to break down the 50-hour ESP course into units, they allocated only 12.44 class hours for grammar (less than 25% of the course time). Further research will, hopefully, help ESP teachers to strike a reasonable balance between grammar, general English and vocational content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogika-Pedagogy
Pedagogika-Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信