“向四面八方分裂”:探索幸福感和日常责任对小学后领导感知压力的影响

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Burke, Paula Kinnarney, Maija Salokangas
{"title":"“向四面八方分裂”:探索幸福感和日常责任对小学后领导感知压力的影响","authors":"J. Burke, Paula Kinnarney, Maija Salokangas","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2021.2016683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stress is an inevitable part of school leadership. However, little is known about the main causes of school leaders’ stress in Ireland, and their association with workplace wellbeing and leaders’ daily responsibilities. The current paper aimed to address this gap. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design survey was conducted with 267 school leaders in the Republic of Ireland, the majority of whom were at least 5 years in their role. The qualitative results demonstrated that three main issues causing leaders stress were (1) relational issues, (2) systemic issues relating to the external pressures, and (3) systemic issues relating to their daily responsibilities. A further, multiple regression identified that 29% of the variance in leaders’ stress was explained by daily responsibilities with two, in particular, predicting their higher stress levels (1) employee relations (beta = .24), and (2) new teacher or substitute teacher appointments (beta = .22). Finally, 25% of the variance in leaders’ stress was explained by work-related wellbeing, in particular, four factors predicted leaders’ stress levels (1) perceiving their work as meaningful, (2) high levels of physical health, (3) high levels of positive affect, and (4) low levels of negative affect. The implications of the study are discussed along with the recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"110 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Split in all directions’: an exploration of the impact of wellbeing and daily responsibilities on post-primary school leaders’ perceived stress\",\"authors\":\"J. Burke, Paula Kinnarney, Maija Salokangas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2021.2016683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stress is an inevitable part of school leadership. However, little is known about the main causes of school leaders’ stress in Ireland, and their association with workplace wellbeing and leaders’ daily responsibilities. The current paper aimed to address this gap. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design survey was conducted with 267 school leaders in the Republic of Ireland, the majority of whom were at least 5 years in their role. The qualitative results demonstrated that three main issues causing leaders stress were (1) relational issues, (2) systemic issues relating to the external pressures, and (3) systemic issues relating to their daily responsibilities. A further, multiple regression identified that 29% of the variance in leaders’ stress was explained by daily responsibilities with two, in particular, predicting their higher stress levels (1) employee relations (beta = .24), and (2) new teacher or substitute teacher appointments (beta = .22). Finally, 25% of the variance in leaders’ stress was explained by work-related wellbeing, in particular, four factors predicted leaders’ stress levels (1) perceiving their work as meaningful, (2) high levels of physical health, (3) high levels of positive affect, and (4) low levels of negative affect. The implications of the study are discussed along with the recommendations for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.2016683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.2016683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

压力是学校领导不可避免的一部分。然而,人们对爱尔兰学校领导压力的主要原因,以及他们与工作场所幸福感和领导者日常责任的关系知之甚少。本文旨在解决这一差距。对爱尔兰共和国的267名学校领导进行了一项横断面混合方法设计调查,其中大多数人至少担任了5年的职务。定性结果表明,导致领导压力的三个主要问题是(1)关系问题,(2)与外部压力有关的系统问题,(3)与日常责任有关的系统问题。进一步的多元回归发现,29%的领导者压力差异可以用日常责任来解释,其中两个特别预测他们的压力水平更高(1)员工关系(beta = .24),(2)新教师或代课教师任命(beta = .22)。最后,25%的领导者压力差异可以用工作幸福感来解释,特别是四个因素预测领导者的压力水平(1)认为他们的工作是有意义的,(2)高水平的身体健康,(3)高水平的积极影响,(4)低水平的消极影响。讨论了本研究的意义,并对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Split in all directions’: an exploration of the impact of wellbeing and daily responsibilities on post-primary school leaders’ perceived stress
ABSTRACT Stress is an inevitable part of school leadership. However, little is known about the main causes of school leaders’ stress in Ireland, and their association with workplace wellbeing and leaders’ daily responsibilities. The current paper aimed to address this gap. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design survey was conducted with 267 school leaders in the Republic of Ireland, the majority of whom were at least 5 years in their role. The qualitative results demonstrated that three main issues causing leaders stress were (1) relational issues, (2) systemic issues relating to the external pressures, and (3) systemic issues relating to their daily responsibilities. A further, multiple regression identified that 29% of the variance in leaders’ stress was explained by daily responsibilities with two, in particular, predicting their higher stress levels (1) employee relations (beta = .24), and (2) new teacher or substitute teacher appointments (beta = .22). Finally, 25% of the variance in leaders’ stress was explained by work-related wellbeing, in particular, four factors predicted leaders’ stress levels (1) perceiving their work as meaningful, (2) high levels of physical health, (3) high levels of positive affect, and (4) low levels of negative affect. The implications of the study are discussed along with the recommendations for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Leadership & Management
School Leadership & Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.60%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信