条件辨别训练中的眼动与等价类形成

Steffen Hansen, E. Arntzen
{"title":"条件辨别训练中的眼动与等价类形成","authors":"Steffen Hansen, E. Arntzen","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2018.1553379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ocular observing response topographies, as duration and number of eye fixations, vary among conditional discrimination procedures. Such measures have yet to be accounted for as a function of different training structures as the many-to-one (MTO), one-to-many (OTM), or linear series (LS). The present experiment explored differential outcomes in eye movement topographies, as duration and number of eye fixations, during the potential formation of six 3-member equivalence classes—prepared simultaneously and in a sequential training arrangement. Nine college students participated. Results showed that one of three participants, prepared with MTO, OTM, and LS, respectively, formed equivalence classes. Participants who responded in accordance with stimulus equivalence revealed longer fixation durations to sample stimuli and shorter fixation durations to comparison stimuli and, furthermore, fixated longer and more often on correct comparison stimuli, regardless of equivalence classformation. These findings have implications with respect to eye movements predictive value of delayed emergence of equivalence classes.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":"56 1","pages":"4 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye movements during conditional discrimination training and equivalence class formation\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Hansen, E. Arntzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2018.1553379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ocular observing response topographies, as duration and number of eye fixations, vary among conditional discrimination procedures. Such measures have yet to be accounted for as a function of different training structures as the many-to-one (MTO), one-to-many (OTM), or linear series (LS). The present experiment explored differential outcomes in eye movement topographies, as duration and number of eye fixations, during the potential formation of six 3-member equivalence classes—prepared simultaneously and in a sequential training arrangement. Nine college students participated. Results showed that one of three participants, prepared with MTO, OTM, and LS, respectively, formed equivalence classes. Participants who responded in accordance with stimulus equivalence revealed longer fixation durations to sample stimuli and shorter fixation durations to comparison stimuli and, furthermore, fixated longer and more often on correct comparison stimuli, regardless of equivalence classformation. These findings have implications with respect to eye movements predictive value of delayed emergence of equivalence classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1553379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1553379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

眼睛观察反应的地形,如眼睛注视的持续时间和次数,在条件辨别程序中是不同的。这些措施还没有被解释为不同训练结构的函数,如多对一(MTO)、一对多(OTM)或线性序列(LS)。本实验探讨了在同时准备和顺序训练安排的6个3人等效类的潜在形成过程中,眼动地形的不同结果,如眼睛注视的持续时间和次数。共有9名大学生参加。结果表明,分别用MTO、OTM和LS制备的3个参与者中有1个形成了等价类。根据刺激等效性做出反应的参与者对样本刺激的注视时间更长,对比较刺激的注视时间更短,而且,无论是否存在等效分类,对正确的比较刺激的注视时间更长、更频繁。这些发现对眼动对等价类延迟出现的预测价值具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eye movements during conditional discrimination training and equivalence class formation
ABSTRACT Ocular observing response topographies, as duration and number of eye fixations, vary among conditional discrimination procedures. Such measures have yet to be accounted for as a function of different training structures as the many-to-one (MTO), one-to-many (OTM), or linear series (LS). The present experiment explored differential outcomes in eye movement topographies, as duration and number of eye fixations, during the potential formation of six 3-member equivalence classes—prepared simultaneously and in a sequential training arrangement. Nine college students participated. Results showed that one of three participants, prepared with MTO, OTM, and LS, respectively, formed equivalence classes. Participants who responded in accordance with stimulus equivalence revealed longer fixation durations to sample stimuli and shorter fixation durations to comparison stimuli and, furthermore, fixated longer and more often on correct comparison stimuli, regardless of equivalence classformation. These findings have implications with respect to eye movements predictive value of delayed emergence of equivalence classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Behavior Analysis
European Journal of Behavior Analysis Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信