基于标准的评分是否有效?

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Laura J. Link, T. Guskey
{"title":"基于标准的评分是否有效?","authors":"Laura J. Link, T. Guskey","doi":"10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This analysis explores the essential criteria necessary to define standards-based grading (SBG) and to judge its effectiveness. Findings reveal that although many schools today are initiating SBG reforms, there’s little consensus on what “standards-based grading” actually means. As a result, SBG implementation is widely inconsistent due to an array of factors, including varying and uneven guidance provided by SBG proponents. Without precisely knowing what defines SBG and the clear criteria for judging its effectiveness, uncertainty, confusion, frustration, and resistance are leading educators to abandon SBG efforts altogether. The researchers conclude that there are three essential criteria necessary to define SBG and to judge its effectiveness in schools. When these criteria are discussed, applied, and met consistently, findings indicate that SBG can effectively serve its primary purpose—as an important tool for communicating students’ performance with students and parents.","PeriodicalId":48177,"journal":{"name":"Theory Into Practice","volume":"61 1","pages":"406 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is standards-based grading effective?\",\"authors\":\"Laura J. Link, T. Guskey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This analysis explores the essential criteria necessary to define standards-based grading (SBG) and to judge its effectiveness. Findings reveal that although many schools today are initiating SBG reforms, there’s little consensus on what “standards-based grading” actually means. As a result, SBG implementation is widely inconsistent due to an array of factors, including varying and uneven guidance provided by SBG proponents. Without precisely knowing what defines SBG and the clear criteria for judging its effectiveness, uncertainty, confusion, frustration, and resistance are leading educators to abandon SBG efforts altogether. The researchers conclude that there are three essential criteria necessary to define SBG and to judge its effectiveness in schools. When these criteria are discussed, applied, and met consistently, findings indicate that SBG can effectively serve its primary purpose—as an important tool for communicating students’ performance with students and parents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"406 - 417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本分析探讨了定义基于标准的分级(SBG)和判断其有效性所必需的基本标准。调查结果显示,尽管如今许多学校都在启动SBG改革,但对于“基于标准的评分”的真正含义,人们几乎没有达成共识。因此,由于一系列因素,包括SBG支持者提供的不同和不平衡的指导,SBG的实施普遍不一致。没有确切地知道什么定义了同性恋群体,以及判断其有效性的明确标准,不确定性、困惑、挫折和阻力导致教育者完全放弃同性恋群体的努力。研究人员得出结论,有三个必要的基本标准来定义SBG并判断其在学校中的有效性。当这些标准得到一致的讨论、应用和满足时,研究结果表明,SBG可以有效地实现其主要目的——作为与学生和家长沟通学生表现的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is standards-based grading effective?
ABSTRACT This analysis explores the essential criteria necessary to define standards-based grading (SBG) and to judge its effectiveness. Findings reveal that although many schools today are initiating SBG reforms, there’s little consensus on what “standards-based grading” actually means. As a result, SBG implementation is widely inconsistent due to an array of factors, including varying and uneven guidance provided by SBG proponents. Without precisely knowing what defines SBG and the clear criteria for judging its effectiveness, uncertainty, confusion, frustration, and resistance are leading educators to abandon SBG efforts altogether. The researchers conclude that there are three essential criteria necessary to define SBG and to judge its effectiveness in schools. When these criteria are discussed, applied, and met consistently, findings indicate that SBG can effectively serve its primary purpose—as an important tool for communicating students’ performance with students and parents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory Into Practice
Theory Into Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, Theory Into Practice (TIP) is a nationally recognized, peer reviewed journal featuring multiple perspectives and scholarly, yet practical and engaging, discussions of important issues in education. TIP publishes articles covering all levels and areas of education, including learning and teaching; counseling; assessment; teacher education and professional development; classroom management; administration and supervision; curriculum; policy; and technology. Each issue of TIP is devoted to a timely theme developed by a Guest Editor who has expertise in the theme area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信