研究生工程身份的不平等:学科差异和机会结构

Q1 Social Sciences

Australasian Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI:10.1002/jee.20427

M. Bahnson, H. Perkins, M. Tsugawa, D. Satterfield, Mackenzie Parker, C. Cass, Adam Kirn

{"title":"研究生工程身份的不平等:学科差异和机会结构","authors":"M. Bahnson, H. Perkins, M. Tsugawa, D. Satterfield, Mackenzie Parker, C. Cass, Adam Kirn","doi":"10.1002/jee.20427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The retention of traditionally underserved students remains a pressing problem across graduate engineering programs. Disciplinary differences in graduate engineering identity provide a lens to investigate students' experiences and can pinpoint potential opportunity structures that support or hinder progress based on social and personal identities.","PeriodicalId":38191,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures\",\"authors\":\"M. Bahnson, H. Perkins, M. Tsugawa, D. Satterfield, Mackenzie Parker, C. Cass, Adam Kirn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jee.20427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The retention of traditionally underserved students remains a pressing problem across graduate engineering programs. Disciplinary differences in graduate engineering identity provide a lens to investigate students' experiences and can pinpoint potential opportunity structures that support or hinder progress based on social and personal identities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

留住传统上得不到充分教育的学生仍然是整个研究生工程项目面临的一个紧迫问题。研究生工程身份的学科差异为调查学生的经历提供了一个视角，并可以确定支持或阻碍基于社会和个人身份的进步的潜在机会结构。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures

The retention of traditionally underserved students remains a pressing problem across graduate engineering programs. Disciplinary differences in graduate engineering identity provide a lens to investigate students' experiences and can pinpoint potential opportunity structures that support or hinder progress based on social and personal identities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australasian Journal of Engineering Education Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量