模棱两可、困惑不解、争论:地区领导应对新冠疫情的价值观竞争

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jeff Walls, K. Louis
{"title":"模棱两可、困惑不解、争论:地区领导应对新冠疫情的价值观竞争","authors":"Jeff Walls, K. Louis","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2022.2162873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores school district leaders’ strategies for managing the intersecting challenges of ambiguity, befuddlement, and contestation produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on interview data from district leaders in the United States, the analysis is framed in existing research regarding how public administrators navigate competing values when making choices that have implications for ‘how ought we to be?’ in a given situation. We find that district leaders employed two strategies to manage these conflicts: (1) trying to focus on the expressed or inferred needs of political factions rather than the core disagreement and using personal and relational capital to manage disappointment and compromise, and (2) shifting the focus of leadership goals within the context of their original vision and core values. This study provides insight into both how educational leaders sort through value conflicts and the organisational implications of those processes.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"88 1","pages":"167 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambiguity, befuddlement, contestation: competing values in district leaders’ navigation of the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Walls, K. Louis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2022.2162873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explores school district leaders’ strategies for managing the intersecting challenges of ambiguity, befuddlement, and contestation produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on interview data from district leaders in the United States, the analysis is framed in existing research regarding how public administrators navigate competing values when making choices that have implications for ‘how ought we to be?’ in a given situation. We find that district leaders employed two strategies to manage these conflicts: (1) trying to focus on the expressed or inferred needs of political factions rather than the core disagreement and using personal and relational capital to manage disappointment and compromise, and (2) shifting the focus of leadership goals within the context of their original vision and core values. This study provides insight into both how educational leaders sort through value conflicts and the organisational implications of those processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2162873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2162873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了学区领导应对新冠肺炎大流行带来的歧义、困惑和争论等交叉挑战的策略。根据美国地区领导人的访谈数据,该分析是在现有研究的框架下进行的,该研究涉及公共行政人员在做出“我们应该如何成为”的选择时如何驾驭相互竞争的价值观?在特定的情况下。我们发现地区领导人采用了两种策略来管理这些冲突:(1)试图关注政治派别表达或推断的需求,而不是核心分歧,并利用个人和关系资本来管理失望和妥协;(2)在他们最初的愿景和核心价值观的背景下转移领导目标的重点。这项研究为教育领导者如何梳理价值观冲突以及这些过程对组织的影响提供了深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambiguity, befuddlement, contestation: competing values in district leaders’ navigation of the COVID-19 pandemic
ABSTRACT This study explores school district leaders’ strategies for managing the intersecting challenges of ambiguity, befuddlement, and contestation produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on interview data from district leaders in the United States, the analysis is framed in existing research regarding how public administrators navigate competing values when making choices that have implications for ‘how ought we to be?’ in a given situation. We find that district leaders employed two strategies to manage these conflicts: (1) trying to focus on the expressed or inferred needs of political factions rather than the core disagreement and using personal and relational capital to manage disappointment and compromise, and (2) shifting the focus of leadership goals within the context of their original vision and core values. This study provides insight into both how educational leaders sort through value conflicts and the organisational implications of those processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Leadership & Management
School Leadership & Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.60%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信