强化与惩罚对人类选择的相对影响

Toshikazu Kuroda, Carlos R. X. Cançado, Christopher A. Podlesnik
{"title":"强化与惩罚对人类选择的相对影响","authors":"Toshikazu Kuroda, Carlos R. X. Cançado, Christopher A. Podlesnik","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2018.1465754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An experiment with humans was conducted to assess the relative effects of reinforcement and punishment on choice. Point gains and losses were programmed as reinforcers and punishers, respectively. Participants used a mouse to click two buttons on a computer screen while the ratio of point gains was varied according to a concurrent variable-interval schedule. Responding was sensitive to relative point gains in baselines. When a schedule of point loss was superimposed on one button, relative to baseline, bias away from the point-loss button was observed, indicating the punishment effects of losses. Finally, a schedule arranging equal rates of both point gains and losses was superimposed on one button. One participant showed no change in bias and two showed shifts in bias away from the alternative with the superimposed schedule relative to baseline. These results suggest that punishment effects are at least equal and sometimes greater than reinforcement effects..","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative effects of reinforcement and punishment on human choice\",\"authors\":\"Toshikazu Kuroda, Carlos R. X. Cançado, Christopher A. Podlesnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2018.1465754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT An experiment with humans was conducted to assess the relative effects of reinforcement and punishment on choice. Point gains and losses were programmed as reinforcers and punishers, respectively. Participants used a mouse to click two buttons on a computer screen while the ratio of point gains was varied according to a concurrent variable-interval schedule. Responding was sensitive to relative point gains in baselines. When a schedule of point loss was superimposed on one button, relative to baseline, bias away from the point-loss button was observed, indicating the punishment effects of losses. Finally, a schedule arranging equal rates of both point gains and losses was superimposed on one button. One participant showed no change in bias and two showed shifts in bias away from the alternative with the superimposed schedule relative to baseline. These results suggest that punishment effects are at least equal and sometimes greater than reinforcement effects..\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1465754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1465754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本研究以人类为对象,研究强化与惩罚对选择的相对影响。积分的获得和损失分别被编程为强化和惩罚。参与者使用鼠标点击电脑屏幕上的两个按钮,而得分的比例根据同时进行的可变间隔计划而变化。反应对基线的相对积分增长很敏感。当在一个按钮上叠加一个失分时间表时,相对于基线,观察到偏离失分按钮的偏差,表明损失的惩罚效应。最后,在一个按钮上叠加了一个安排积分增益和损失相等比率的时间表。一名参与者的偏差没有变化,两名参与者的偏差偏离了与基线相关的叠加时间表。这些结果表明,惩罚效应至少与强化效应相等,有时甚至更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative effects of reinforcement and punishment on human choice
ABSTRACT An experiment with humans was conducted to assess the relative effects of reinforcement and punishment on choice. Point gains and losses were programmed as reinforcers and punishers, respectively. Participants used a mouse to click two buttons on a computer screen while the ratio of point gains was varied according to a concurrent variable-interval schedule. Responding was sensitive to relative point gains in baselines. When a schedule of point loss was superimposed on one button, relative to baseline, bias away from the point-loss button was observed, indicating the punishment effects of losses. Finally, a schedule arranging equal rates of both point gains and losses was superimposed on one button. One participant showed no change in bias and two showed shifts in bias away from the alternative with the superimposed schedule relative to baseline. These results suggest that punishment effects are at least equal and sometimes greater than reinforcement effects..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Behavior Analysis
European Journal of Behavior Analysis Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信