教师专业发展的设计与教师学习课堂话语有何关系?一项为期一年的干预研究的结果

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dennis Hauk, A. Gröschner, M. Weil, R. Böheim, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, M. Alles, T. Seidel
{"title":"教师专业发展的设计与教师学习课堂话语有何关系?一项为期一年的干预研究的结果","authors":"Dennis Hauk, A. Gröschner, M. Weil, R. Böheim, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, M. Alles, T. Seidel","doi":"10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Promoting teachers to lead classroom discourse effectively is a relevant topic for teacher professional development worldwide. This study compares the impacts of two teacher professional development programmes that aim to support teachers in their classroom discourse practices. In one programme, an adaptive and practitioner-led approach was applied, while in the other programme, a more specified and direct instructional approach was implemented. In a one-year intervention study, we investigated how both designs affected teacher knowledge about classroom discourse and teacher beliefs. Both programmes were filmed, and the implementation of their design features was video-analysed. The effects on teacher knowledge and beliefs were measured via self-reporting and a knowledge test. The results show no differences in teachers’ knowledge acquisition over time. However, the adaptive-to-practice programme was significantly more successful in affecting teacher beliefs. The findings are discussed in light of further research and practical implications for teacher professional development.","PeriodicalId":47457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is the design of teacher professional development related to teacher learning about classroom discourse? Findings from a one-year intervention study\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Hauk, A. Gröschner, M. Weil, R. Böheim, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, M. Alles, T. Seidel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Promoting teachers to lead classroom discourse effectively is a relevant topic for teacher professional development worldwide. This study compares the impacts of two teacher professional development programmes that aim to support teachers in their classroom discourse practices. In one programme, an adaptive and practitioner-led approach was applied, while in the other programme, a more specified and direct instructional approach was implemented. In a one-year intervention study, we investigated how both designs affected teacher knowledge about classroom discourse and teacher beliefs. Both programmes were filmed, and the implementation of their design features was video-analysed. The effects on teacher knowledge and beliefs were measured via self-reporting and a knowledge test. The results show no differences in teachers’ knowledge acquisition over time. However, the adaptive-to-practice programme was significantly more successful in affecting teacher beliefs. The findings are discussed in light of further research and practical implications for teacher professional development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How is the design of teacher professional development related to teacher learning about classroom discourse? Findings from a one-year intervention study
ABSTRACT Promoting teachers to lead classroom discourse effectively is a relevant topic for teacher professional development worldwide. This study compares the impacts of two teacher professional development programmes that aim to support teachers in their classroom discourse practices. In one programme, an adaptive and practitioner-led approach was applied, while in the other programme, a more specified and direct instructional approach was implemented. In a one-year intervention study, we investigated how both designs affected teacher knowledge about classroom discourse and teacher beliefs. Both programmes were filmed, and the implementation of their design features was video-analysed. The effects on teacher knowledge and beliefs were measured via self-reporting and a knowledge test. The results show no differences in teachers’ knowledge acquisition over time. However, the adaptive-to-practice programme was significantly more successful in affecting teacher beliefs. The findings are discussed in light of further research and practical implications for teacher professional development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Teaching
Journal of Education for Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Teaching is an established international refereed periodical which publishes original contributions on the subject of teacher education. The journal interprets "teacher education" in the widest sense, to include initial training, in-service education and staff development. The editors welcome scholarly discussions of new issues, reports of research projects or surveys of research work in particular fields, and contributions to current debates in teacher education throughout the world, generally or on specific issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信