The evolution of high probability command sequences: Theoretical and procedural concerns

ABSTRACT Behavior analysts have studied John A. Nevin’s behavior momentum theory (BMT) since its introduction over three decades ago. The work of applied and translational researchers led to the development of the high-probability command sequence (HPCS). However, as BMT has been extrapolated to applied settings from experimental laboratories, a trend among applied behavior analysts has been to intermingle the terms, BMT and HPCS. Researchers must address this problematic trend because theoretical frameworks established in an experimental setting are conceptual while behavior modification technologies are procedural. This review aims to discuss several important distinctions between BMT and HPCS in an effort to encourage the exploration of behavioral momentum in areas other than noncompliance and education.