捍卫未来的大学

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Means, Graham B. Slater
{"title":"捍卫未来的大学","authors":"A. Means, Graham B. Slater","doi":"10.1080/10714413.2023.2174300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are pleased to open the 2023 volume of the Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies with a themed issue on the university and the cultural politics of higher education. The problems confronting the university are legion and include the precaritization and casualization of the university labor force, relentless right-wing attacks, decades of state disinvestment and student-debt-financed tuition hikes, and an alarming expansion of corporate administration that seems to exist largely to perpetuate its own culture of nullity. Moreover, we live an era of predatory capitalism and resurgent fascism that eat away at the social fabric and manifest in horrifying racism, misogyny, and violence. It is an era of speed, disorientation, and algorithmic manipulation. Vast asymmetries of responsibility and vulnerability mark a horizon of ecological instability. All of these aspects of the present are challenges to the university as well as problems for the university. Despite a prevailing sense of disillusionment, we believe that one can recognize the university as implicated in a range of imperial imaginaries and processes, while at the same time defend the idea of the university as a space and time of study, thought, care, and potentiality. The future of the university, if education means anything at all, is necessarily open and undecided. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies has long published critical scholarship on higher education and the university, perhaps most notably its militarization and corporatization, which in North America and the United Kingdom have gone hand-in-hand for decades with neoliberal assaults on public education and social life. Recent right-wing attacks on the university can be traced to the reassertion of the business class and the reactionary backlash against the democratic revolts of the 1960s, which in the United States, can be linked to the 1971 publication of the Powell Memorandum. Driven by a fearmongering narrative about the threat that diverse, politically active university campuses posed to corporate interests and social order, the Powell Memo called for political and ideological war against workers, students, and civil rights activists. The Powell Memo foreshadowed not only the war on drugs and mass incarceration as strategies for managing those being dispossessed by the emerging postindustrial economy, but also the creation of a vast infrastructure of think tanks, endowed chairs in university economics departments, philanthropic foundations, corporate lobbying groups, and media organizations oriented to legitimize ideas that the university exists mainly to subsidize workforce training; that it should mirror and correspond to markets and corporate culture; and that it should provide an extension campus for military and national security research and development (Ferguson, 2017). Decades later, we can see the negative impacts of the neoliberal revolution on all facets of social life and on the purpose and organization of the university. Academics, educators, scholars, artists, intellectuals, and cultural workers must consider seriously the late Stanley Aronowitz’s (2008) question, “Where are the forces that are prepared to defend true higher learning?” (p. 131). Given the intensification of reactionary attacks on higher education and its role in promoting thought and solidaristic values,","PeriodicalId":45129,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defending a future university to come\",\"authors\":\"A. Means, Graham B. Slater\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10714413.2023.2174300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are pleased to open the 2023 volume of the Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies with a themed issue on the university and the cultural politics of higher education. The problems confronting the university are legion and include the precaritization and casualization of the university labor force, relentless right-wing attacks, decades of state disinvestment and student-debt-financed tuition hikes, and an alarming expansion of corporate administration that seems to exist largely to perpetuate its own culture of nullity. Moreover, we live an era of predatory capitalism and resurgent fascism that eat away at the social fabric and manifest in horrifying racism, misogyny, and violence. It is an era of speed, disorientation, and algorithmic manipulation. Vast asymmetries of responsibility and vulnerability mark a horizon of ecological instability. All of these aspects of the present are challenges to the university as well as problems for the university. Despite a prevailing sense of disillusionment, we believe that one can recognize the university as implicated in a range of imperial imaginaries and processes, while at the same time defend the idea of the university as a space and time of study, thought, care, and potentiality. The future of the university, if education means anything at all, is necessarily open and undecided. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies has long published critical scholarship on higher education and the university, perhaps most notably its militarization and corporatization, which in North America and the United Kingdom have gone hand-in-hand for decades with neoliberal assaults on public education and social life. Recent right-wing attacks on the university can be traced to the reassertion of the business class and the reactionary backlash against the democratic revolts of the 1960s, which in the United States, can be linked to the 1971 publication of the Powell Memorandum. Driven by a fearmongering narrative about the threat that diverse, politically active university campuses posed to corporate interests and social order, the Powell Memo called for political and ideological war against workers, students, and civil rights activists. The Powell Memo foreshadowed not only the war on drugs and mass incarceration as strategies for managing those being dispossessed by the emerging postindustrial economy, but also the creation of a vast infrastructure of think tanks, endowed chairs in university economics departments, philanthropic foundations, corporate lobbying groups, and media organizations oriented to legitimize ideas that the university exists mainly to subsidize workforce training; that it should mirror and correspond to markets and corporate culture; and that it should provide an extension campus for military and national security research and development (Ferguson, 2017). Decades later, we can see the negative impacts of the neoliberal revolution on all facets of social life and on the purpose and organization of the university. Academics, educators, scholars, artists, intellectuals, and cultural workers must consider seriously the late Stanley Aronowitz’s (2008) question, “Where are the forces that are prepared to defend true higher learning?” (p. 131). Given the intensification of reactionary attacks on higher education and its role in promoting thought and solidaristic values,\",\"PeriodicalId\":45129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2023.2174300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2023.2174300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们很高兴2023年的《教育、教育学和文化研究评论》将以大学和高等教育的文化政治为主题。大学面临的问题很多,包括大学劳动力的不稳定和临时工化,无情的右翼攻击,数十年的国家撤资和学生债务资助的学费上涨,以及公司管理的惊人扩张,这种扩张似乎主要是为了延续自己的无用文化。此外,我们生活在一个掠夺性资本主义和法西斯主义复兴的时代,它们侵蚀着社会结构,表现为可怕的种族主义、厌女症和暴力。这是一个速度、迷失方向和算法操纵的时代。责任和脆弱性的巨大不对称标志着生态不稳定的地平线。这些都是对大学的挑战,也是大学面临的问题。尽管有一种普遍的幻灭感,但我们相信,人们可以认识到大学与一系列帝国想象和过程有关,同时捍卫大学作为学习、思考、关怀和潜力的空间和时间的观点。大学的未来,如果教育有任何意义的话,必然是开放和未定的。《教育、教育学和文化研究评论》长期以来发表了关于高等教育和大学的批判性学术研究,其中最引人注目的可能是它的军事化和公有化,这在北美和英国几十年来一直与新自由主义对公共教育和社会生活的攻击密切相关。最近右翼对大学的攻击可以追溯到商业阶级的重新主张和对20世纪60年代美国民主起义的反动反弹,这可以与1971年出版的鲍威尔备忘录联系起来。在一种关于多元化、政治活跃的大学校园对企业利益和社会秩序构成威胁的恐惧叙事的推动下,鲍威尔备忘录呼吁对工人、学生和民权活动家进行政治和意识形态的战争。《鲍威尔备忘录》不仅预示着禁毒战争和大规模监禁是管理那些被新兴的后工业经济剥夺财产的人的策略,而且还预示着建立一个庞大的基础设施,包括智库、大学经济系的捐赠主席、慈善基金会、企业游说团体和媒体组织,旨在使大学存在的主要目的是补贴劳动力培训的观点合法化;它应该反映并符合市场和企业文化;它应该为军事和国家安全研究和发展提供一个扩展校园(Ferguson, 2017)。几十年后,我们可以看到新自由主义革命对社会生活的各个方面以及大学的宗旨和组织的负面影响。学者、教育家、学者、艺术家、知识分子和文化工作者必须认真考虑已故的斯坦利·阿罗诺维茨(Stanley Aronowitz, 2008)提出的问题:“准备捍卫真正的高等教育的力量在哪里?”(第131页)。鉴于反动派对高等教育及其在促进思想和团结价值观方面的作用的攻击日益加剧,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defending a future university to come
We are pleased to open the 2023 volume of the Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies with a themed issue on the university and the cultural politics of higher education. The problems confronting the university are legion and include the precaritization and casualization of the university labor force, relentless right-wing attacks, decades of state disinvestment and student-debt-financed tuition hikes, and an alarming expansion of corporate administration that seems to exist largely to perpetuate its own culture of nullity. Moreover, we live an era of predatory capitalism and resurgent fascism that eat away at the social fabric and manifest in horrifying racism, misogyny, and violence. It is an era of speed, disorientation, and algorithmic manipulation. Vast asymmetries of responsibility and vulnerability mark a horizon of ecological instability. All of these aspects of the present are challenges to the university as well as problems for the university. Despite a prevailing sense of disillusionment, we believe that one can recognize the university as implicated in a range of imperial imaginaries and processes, while at the same time defend the idea of the university as a space and time of study, thought, care, and potentiality. The future of the university, if education means anything at all, is necessarily open and undecided. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies has long published critical scholarship on higher education and the university, perhaps most notably its militarization and corporatization, which in North America and the United Kingdom have gone hand-in-hand for decades with neoliberal assaults on public education and social life. Recent right-wing attacks on the university can be traced to the reassertion of the business class and the reactionary backlash against the democratic revolts of the 1960s, which in the United States, can be linked to the 1971 publication of the Powell Memorandum. Driven by a fearmongering narrative about the threat that diverse, politically active university campuses posed to corporate interests and social order, the Powell Memo called for political and ideological war against workers, students, and civil rights activists. The Powell Memo foreshadowed not only the war on drugs and mass incarceration as strategies for managing those being dispossessed by the emerging postindustrial economy, but also the creation of a vast infrastructure of think tanks, endowed chairs in university economics departments, philanthropic foundations, corporate lobbying groups, and media organizations oriented to legitimize ideas that the university exists mainly to subsidize workforce training; that it should mirror and correspond to markets and corporate culture; and that it should provide an extension campus for military and national security research and development (Ferguson, 2017). Decades later, we can see the negative impacts of the neoliberal revolution on all facets of social life and on the purpose and organization of the university. Academics, educators, scholars, artists, intellectuals, and cultural workers must consider seriously the late Stanley Aronowitz’s (2008) question, “Where are the forces that are prepared to defend true higher learning?” (p. 131). Given the intensification of reactionary attacks on higher education and its role in promoting thought and solidaristic values,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信