混合比例和羽扇豆品种对复合面粉功能特性及羽扇豆精-羽扇豆精感官评价的影响

Lamesgen Yegrem, S. Abera, M. Temesgen
{"title":"混合比例和羽扇豆品种对复合面粉功能特性及羽扇豆精-羽扇豆精感官评价的影响","authors":"Lamesgen Yegrem, S. Abera, M. Temesgen","doi":"10.7176/fsqm/105-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to investigate the effect of lupine flour on functional properties and sensory acceptability of tef-lupine blended injera. Injera is a staple food for Ethiopian and it is fermented, sour leavened pancake-like bread made from blending of different cereals like tef, barley, sorghum, maize and wheat. Besides, there are limited studies on formulating of injera from composite flour with legumes (lupine). The effect of two factors two lupine varieties (Australian sweet lupine and Dibettered lupine seed) and blending ratios (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 17.5 and 20). Maximum and minimum levels of independent variables were first investigated by doing a preliminary analysis and founded that tef from up to80-100% and lupines from up to 0-20%. Response surface methodology was applied to find the formulations and predictive model. Sensory acceptance of tef-lupine injera was affected by interaction of varieties and blending ratios. Oil absorption capacity and swelling power properties of composite flour decrease as blending ratio of lupines increased and water absorption and foaming capacity increased as blending ratio of lupines increases for both varieties. As the sensory acceptability scores data indicated for both lupine varieties blended with tef for the production of injeras of up to 15% lupines almost all sensory attributes showed higher scores without significantly different among them but after 15% lupine addition there were observed drop of the sensory acceptability scores. In a 7 point hedonic scale, the composite sample tef injeras with 10% dibettered lupine seed variety addition had the highest scores of 6.09, 6.22, 6.09 and 6.18 in eye size, aroma, rollability and overall acceptability respectively. The L* value and number of eye by injera eye software were 72.77 to 79.84 and 14220.43 to 18929.33, respectively. The L values of blended injera increased as lupine proportion were increased, but the number of injeras eyes decreased. yellowness (b) colour of the product. This effect was expected because of the more intense yellow colour of lupine flour. These results agree with those obtained by Dodok et al . (1993), who observed that Lupine seeds contain high levels of carotenoids and zeaxanthin which give the cotyledon (kernel) bright yellow colour and triggered the change in the yellowish colour of bread produced from a composite flour of wheat and lupine.","PeriodicalId":12384,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Quality Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Blending Ratio and Lupine Variety on the Functional Properties of Composite Flours and Sensory Evaluations of Tef-Lupine Injera\",\"authors\":\"Lamesgen Yegrem, S. Abera, M. Temesgen\",\"doi\":\"10.7176/fsqm/105-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to investigate the effect of lupine flour on functional properties and sensory acceptability of tef-lupine blended injera. Injera is a staple food for Ethiopian and it is fermented, sour leavened pancake-like bread made from blending of different cereals like tef, barley, sorghum, maize and wheat. Besides, there are limited studies on formulating of injera from composite flour with legumes (lupine). The effect of two factors two lupine varieties (Australian sweet lupine and Dibettered lupine seed) and blending ratios (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 17.5 and 20). Maximum and minimum levels of independent variables were first investigated by doing a preliminary analysis and founded that tef from up to80-100% and lupines from up to 0-20%. Response surface methodology was applied to find the formulations and predictive model. Sensory acceptance of tef-lupine injera was affected by interaction of varieties and blending ratios. Oil absorption capacity and swelling power properties of composite flour decrease as blending ratio of lupines increased and water absorption and foaming capacity increased as blending ratio of lupines increases for both varieties. As the sensory acceptability scores data indicated for both lupine varieties blended with tef for the production of injeras of up to 15% lupines almost all sensory attributes showed higher scores without significantly different among them but after 15% lupine addition there were observed drop of the sensory acceptability scores. In a 7 point hedonic scale, the composite sample tef injeras with 10% dibettered lupine seed variety addition had the highest scores of 6.09, 6.22, 6.09 and 6.18 in eye size, aroma, rollability and overall acceptability respectively. The L* value and number of eye by injera eye software were 72.77 to 79.84 and 14220.43 to 18929.33, respectively. The L values of blended injera increased as lupine proportion were increased, but the number of injeras eyes decreased. yellowness (b) colour of the product. This effect was expected because of the more intense yellow colour of lupine flour. These results agree with those obtained by Dodok et al . (1993), who observed that Lupine seeds contain high levels of carotenoids and zeaxanthin which give the cotyledon (kernel) bright yellow colour and triggered the change in the yellowish colour of bread produced from a composite flour of wheat and lupine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7176/fsqm/105-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/fsqm/105-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验研究了羽扇豆粉对羽扇豆粉混合英杰拉的功能特性和感官接受度的影响。Injera是埃塞俄比亚人的主食,它是一种发酵的、酸发酵的煎饼状面包,由不同的谷物如tef、大麦、高粱、玉米和小麦混合而成。此外,从豆科植物(羽扇豆)复合面粉中制备羽扇豆粉的研究较少。2个羽扇豆品种(澳洲甜羽扇豆和二劣羽扇豆种子)和混合比例(0、2.5、5、7.5、10、15、17.5和20)的影响。通过进行初步分析,首先调查了最大和最小自变量水平,并发现tef高达80-100%,羽扇豆素高达0-20%。采用响应面法建立了预测模型和公式。羽扇豆的感官接受度受品种互作和混合比例的影响。两品种复合面粉的吸油能力和膨胀性随羽扇豆掺量的增加而降低,吸水能力和发泡能力随羽扇豆掺量的增加而增加。感官可接受性得分数据表明,两种羽扇豆品种在添加15%羽扇豆素时,几乎所有的感官属性得分都较高,但它们之间没有显著差异,但添加15%羽扇豆素后,感官可接受性得分有所下降。在7分享乐量表中,添加10%羽扇豆种子品种的复合样品在眼大小、香气、可卷曲性和总体可接受性方面得分最高,分别为6.09、6.22、6.09和6.18。injera eye软件的L*值为72.77 ~ 79.84,眼数为14220.43 ~ 18929.33。混合鼠眼的L值随羽扇豆素比例的增加而增加,但鼠眼数减少。黄度(b)产品的颜色。这种效果是预料之中的,因为羽扇豆粉的黄色更强烈。这些结果与Dodok等人的结果一致。(1993),他观察到羽扇豆种子含有高水平的类胡萝卜素和玉米黄质,使子叶(仁)呈明亮的黄色,并引起由小麦和羽扇豆复合面粉制成的面包的黄色变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Blending Ratio and Lupine Variety on the Functional Properties of Composite Flours and Sensory Evaluations of Tef-Lupine Injera
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of lupine flour on functional properties and sensory acceptability of tef-lupine blended injera. Injera is a staple food for Ethiopian and it is fermented, sour leavened pancake-like bread made from blending of different cereals like tef, barley, sorghum, maize and wheat. Besides, there are limited studies on formulating of injera from composite flour with legumes (lupine). The effect of two factors two lupine varieties (Australian sweet lupine and Dibettered lupine seed) and blending ratios (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 17.5 and 20). Maximum and minimum levels of independent variables were first investigated by doing a preliminary analysis and founded that tef from up to80-100% and lupines from up to 0-20%. Response surface methodology was applied to find the formulations and predictive model. Sensory acceptance of tef-lupine injera was affected by interaction of varieties and blending ratios. Oil absorption capacity and swelling power properties of composite flour decrease as blending ratio of lupines increased and water absorption and foaming capacity increased as blending ratio of lupines increases for both varieties. As the sensory acceptability scores data indicated for both lupine varieties blended with tef for the production of injeras of up to 15% lupines almost all sensory attributes showed higher scores without significantly different among them but after 15% lupine addition there were observed drop of the sensory acceptability scores. In a 7 point hedonic scale, the composite sample tef injeras with 10% dibettered lupine seed variety addition had the highest scores of 6.09, 6.22, 6.09 and 6.18 in eye size, aroma, rollability and overall acceptability respectively. The L* value and number of eye by injera eye software were 72.77 to 79.84 and 14220.43 to 18929.33, respectively. The L values of blended injera increased as lupine proportion were increased, but the number of injeras eyes decreased. yellowness (b) colour of the product. This effect was expected because of the more intense yellow colour of lupine flour. These results agree with those obtained by Dodok et al . (1993), who observed that Lupine seeds contain high levels of carotenoids and zeaxanthin which give the cotyledon (kernel) bright yellow colour and triggered the change in the yellowish colour of bread produced from a composite flour of wheat and lupine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信