乳腺癌幸存者的个人训练与团体运动处方依从性

Mary C. Hidde, Kelli A. LeBreton, K. Covington, C. Jankowski, H. Leach
{"title":"乳腺癌幸存者的个人训练与团体运动处方依从性","authors":"Mary C. Hidde, Kelli A. LeBreton, K. Covington, C. Jankowski, H. Leach","doi":"10.1249/01.MSS.0000561214.20219.6D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: Exercise interventions can improve fitness and quality of life among breast cancer survivors. The magnitude of these effects may be dependent on compliance to the intended exercise prescription (ExRx), but few studies in cancer survivors have reported this information. This study examined breast cancer survivors’ ExRx compliance during a personal training (PT) or group-based exercise (GBE) intervention. METHODS: Women (N=26) with stage I-II breast cancer who had completed chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment within the previous year were randomly assigned to PT or GBE for 8 weeks. All participants received supervised exercise twice per week for 60 minutes a session. Participants were compliant to aerobic ExRx if they completed 20-30 minutes at 50-80% of heart rate reserve. Participants were compliant to upper and lower body resistance ExRx if they completed 2-3 sets of 8 repetitions within 50-80% of 1RM for chest and leg press. Compliance to aerobic, upper, and lower resistance ExRx was coded dichotomously (yes/no) for each session, then summed and divided by the number of sessions attended to calculate percent compliance. Independent t-tests examined differences in ExRx compliance between PT and GBE. Results are reported as mean±SD. RESULTS: Participants were aged 52±8.5 years, and 13.4±5.1 months post diagnosis. Of the N=24 who completed the intervention, exercise session attendance was 15.8±0.5 (99%) in PT, and 13.4±1.0 (82%) in GBE out of 16 possible sessions (p=.000). Compliance for aerobic ExRx was 77.2±0.17% in PT, and 70.1±0.17% in GBE (p=.41). Compliance for upper body resistance ExRx was 76.0±0.37% in PT and 82.4±0.20% in GBE (p=.597). Compliance for lower body resistance exercise was 80.2±0.23% in PT and 87.9±0.21% in GBE (p=.40). CONCLUSION: Exercise session attendance was higher in PT. Overall ExRx compliance was >70% for aerobic, >80% for resistance, and similar in PT and GBE. With growing support for establishing exercise programs for cancer survivors, it is important to determine sustainable and scalable delivery modalities. GBE may be more resource conscientious than PT, and this study suggests GBE can achieve comparable ExRx compliance to PT. Future exercise intervention studies in breast cancer survivors should examine how ExRx compliance affects health and/or fitness outcomes.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"449 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Training vs. Group-based Exercise Prescription Compliance In Breast Cancer Survivors\",\"authors\":\"Mary C. Hidde, Kelli A. LeBreton, K. Covington, C. Jankowski, H. Leach\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/01.MSS.0000561214.20219.6D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: Exercise interventions can improve fitness and quality of life among breast cancer survivors. The magnitude of these effects may be dependent on compliance to the intended exercise prescription (ExRx), but few studies in cancer survivors have reported this information. This study examined breast cancer survivors’ ExRx compliance during a personal training (PT) or group-based exercise (GBE) intervention. METHODS: Women (N=26) with stage I-II breast cancer who had completed chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment within the previous year were randomly assigned to PT or GBE for 8 weeks. All participants received supervised exercise twice per week for 60 minutes a session. Participants were compliant to aerobic ExRx if they completed 20-30 minutes at 50-80% of heart rate reserve. Participants were compliant to upper and lower body resistance ExRx if they completed 2-3 sets of 8 repetitions within 50-80% of 1RM for chest and leg press. Compliance to aerobic, upper, and lower resistance ExRx was coded dichotomously (yes/no) for each session, then summed and divided by the number of sessions attended to calculate percent compliance. Independent t-tests examined differences in ExRx compliance between PT and GBE. Results are reported as mean±SD. RESULTS: Participants were aged 52±8.5 years, and 13.4±5.1 months post diagnosis. Of the N=24 who completed the intervention, exercise session attendance was 15.8±0.5 (99%) in PT, and 13.4±1.0 (82%) in GBE out of 16 possible sessions (p=.000). Compliance for aerobic ExRx was 77.2±0.17% in PT, and 70.1±0.17% in GBE (p=.41). Compliance for upper body resistance ExRx was 76.0±0.37% in PT and 82.4±0.20% in GBE (p=.597). Compliance for lower body resistance exercise was 80.2±0.23% in PT and 87.9±0.21% in GBE (p=.40). CONCLUSION: Exercise session attendance was higher in PT. Overall ExRx compliance was >70% for aerobic, >80% for resistance, and similar in PT and GBE. With growing support for establishing exercise programs for cancer survivors, it is important to determine sustainable and scalable delivery modalities. GBE may be more resource conscientious than PT, and this study suggests GBE can achieve comparable ExRx compliance to PT. Future exercise intervention studies in breast cancer survivors should examine how ExRx compliance affects health and/or fitness outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"volume\":\"449 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000561214.20219.6D\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000561214.20219.6D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:运动干预可以改善乳腺癌幸存者的健康状况和生活质量。这些影响的程度可能取决于是否遵守预期的运动处方(ExRx),但很少有针对癌症幸存者的研究报告了这一信息。本研究考察了乳腺癌幸存者在个人训练(PT)或团体运动(GBE)干预期间的ExRx依从性。方法:在过去一年内完成化疗和/或放疗的I-II期乳腺癌妇女(N=26)被随机分配到PT或GBE组,为期8周。所有参与者每周都接受两次有监督的锻炼,每次60分钟。如果参与者以50-80%的心率储备完成20-30分钟,他们就会接受有氧锻炼。如果参与者在50-80%的1RM范围内完成2-3组每组8次的胸部和腿部按压,则他们符合上半身和下半身阻力ExRx。对每个疗程的有氧、高阻和低阻ExRx依从性进行二分类编码(是/否),然后除以参加的疗程数,计算百分比依从性。独立t检验检验了PT和GBE在ExRx依从性方面的差异。结果以均数±标准差报告。结果:患者年龄52±8.5岁,确诊后13.4±5.1个月。在完成干预的N=24人中,在16个可能的会话中,PT的运动会话出席率为15.8±0.5 (99%),GBE的运动会话出席率为13.4±1.0 (82%)(p= 0.000)。有氧ExRx的依从性在PT组为77.2±0.17%,在GBE组为70.1±0.17% (p= 0.41)。PT组上肢阻力ExRx的依从性为76.0±0.37%,GBE组为82.4±0.20% (p= 0.597)。PT组下肢阻力运动依从性为80.2±0.23%,GBE组为87.9±0.21% (p= 0.40)。结论:运动组的运动出勤率更高。有氧运动组的总体ExRx依从性为70%,抵抗运动组为80%,运动组和GBE组相似。随着越来越多的人支持为癌症幸存者建立锻炼计划,确定可持续和可扩展的交付模式非常重要。GBE可能比PT更有资源意识,本研究表明GBE可以达到与PT相当的ExRx依从性。未来对乳腺癌幸存者的运动干预研究应该检查ExRx依从性如何影响健康和/或健身结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal Training vs. Group-based Exercise Prescription Compliance In Breast Cancer Survivors
PURPOSE: Exercise interventions can improve fitness and quality of life among breast cancer survivors. The magnitude of these effects may be dependent on compliance to the intended exercise prescription (ExRx), but few studies in cancer survivors have reported this information. This study examined breast cancer survivors’ ExRx compliance during a personal training (PT) or group-based exercise (GBE) intervention. METHODS: Women (N=26) with stage I-II breast cancer who had completed chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment within the previous year were randomly assigned to PT or GBE for 8 weeks. All participants received supervised exercise twice per week for 60 minutes a session. Participants were compliant to aerobic ExRx if they completed 20-30 minutes at 50-80% of heart rate reserve. Participants were compliant to upper and lower body resistance ExRx if they completed 2-3 sets of 8 repetitions within 50-80% of 1RM for chest and leg press. Compliance to aerobic, upper, and lower resistance ExRx was coded dichotomously (yes/no) for each session, then summed and divided by the number of sessions attended to calculate percent compliance. Independent t-tests examined differences in ExRx compliance between PT and GBE. Results are reported as mean±SD. RESULTS: Participants were aged 52±8.5 years, and 13.4±5.1 months post diagnosis. Of the N=24 who completed the intervention, exercise session attendance was 15.8±0.5 (99%) in PT, and 13.4±1.0 (82%) in GBE out of 16 possible sessions (p=.000). Compliance for aerobic ExRx was 77.2±0.17% in PT, and 70.1±0.17% in GBE (p=.41). Compliance for upper body resistance ExRx was 76.0±0.37% in PT and 82.4±0.20% in GBE (p=.597). Compliance for lower body resistance exercise was 80.2±0.23% in PT and 87.9±0.21% in GBE (p=.40). CONCLUSION: Exercise session attendance was higher in PT. Overall ExRx compliance was >70% for aerobic, >80% for resistance, and similar in PT and GBE. With growing support for establishing exercise programs for cancer survivors, it is important to determine sustainable and scalable delivery modalities. GBE may be more resource conscientious than PT, and this study suggests GBE can achieve comparable ExRx compliance to PT. Future exercise intervention studies in breast cancer survivors should examine how ExRx compliance affects health and/or fitness outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信