探讨学生的策略相关信念及其对二语写作反馈策略的中介作用

IF 4.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Tam, Gigi Kai Yin Auyeung
{"title":"探讨学生的策略相关信念及其对二语写作反馈策略的中介作用","authors":"A. Tam, Gigi Kai Yin Auyeung","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2022.2157795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Substantial research indicates that students’ beliefs mediate learning strategies. Nevertheless, students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback are insufficiently addressed. This case study aimed to examine: (1) students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback in L2 writing and (2) how beliefs mediated students’ actions when a feedback intervention was implemented to facilitate students’ use of feedback strategies. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews and reflective journals from 10 Year-1 participants who studied in an associate degree programme at a higher education institute in Hong Kong. Students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback encompass the evaluation of strategies about: (1) understanding feedback, (2) addressing areas for improvement, (3) seeking feedback, and (4) implementing feedback. Nine participants adopted a more comprehensive range of strategies to act on feedback consistent with their strategy-related beliefs. One participant, however, did not appreciate and use feedback. Pedagogical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48267,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"69 1","pages":"1038 - 1052"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring students’ strategy-related beliefs and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback in L2 writing\",\"authors\":\"A. Tam, Gigi Kai Yin Auyeung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02602938.2022.2157795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Substantial research indicates that students’ beliefs mediate learning strategies. Nevertheless, students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback are insufficiently addressed. This case study aimed to examine: (1) students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback in L2 writing and (2) how beliefs mediated students’ actions when a feedback intervention was implemented to facilitate students’ use of feedback strategies. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews and reflective journals from 10 Year-1 participants who studied in an associate degree programme at a higher education institute in Hong Kong. Students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback encompass the evaluation of strategies about: (1) understanding feedback, (2) addressing areas for improvement, (3) seeking feedback, and (4) implementing feedback. Nine participants adopted a more comprehensive range of strategies to act on feedback consistent with their strategy-related beliefs. One participant, however, did not appreciate and use feedback. Pedagogical implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"1038 - 1052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2157795\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2157795","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大量研究表明,学生的信念对学习策略具有中介作用。然而,学生对反馈的策略相关信念及其对根据反馈采取行动的策略的调解尚未得到充分解决。本案例研究旨在研究:(1)学生对二语写作中反馈的策略相关信念;(2)当实施反馈干预以促进学生使用反馈策略时,信念如何调节学生的行为。数据收集自半结构化访谈和反思性期刊,受访者为在香港一所高等教育学院就读副学士课程的10名一年级学生。学生对反馈的策略相关信念包括对策略的评估:(1)理解反馈,(2)解决需要改进的地方,(3)寻求反馈,(4)实施反馈。九名参与者采用了更全面的策略,根据与策略相关的信念相一致的反馈采取行动。然而,一位参与者不欣赏和使用反馈。讨论了教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring students’ strategy-related beliefs and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback in L2 writing
Abstract Substantial research indicates that students’ beliefs mediate learning strategies. Nevertheless, students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback are insufficiently addressed. This case study aimed to examine: (1) students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback in L2 writing and (2) how beliefs mediated students’ actions when a feedback intervention was implemented to facilitate students’ use of feedback strategies. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews and reflective journals from 10 Year-1 participants who studied in an associate degree programme at a higher education institute in Hong Kong. Students’ strategy-related beliefs about feedback encompass the evaluation of strategies about: (1) understanding feedback, (2) addressing areas for improvement, (3) seeking feedback, and (4) implementing feedback. Nine participants adopted a more comprehensive range of strategies to act on feedback consistent with their strategy-related beliefs. One participant, however, did not appreciate and use feedback. Pedagogical implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
15.90%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信