COVID学习损失背后的争议:历史问题、当前衡量标准和未来战略

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Qiyang Zhang, N. Storey
{"title":"COVID学习损失背后的争议:历史问题、当前衡量标准和未来战略","authors":"Qiyang Zhang, N. Storey","doi":"10.1080/00405841.2022.2096380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT COVID learning loss has sparked fierce debate among stakeholders in education. There are debates among concerned educators about ways to understand learning loss reports, methods to measure learning loss, and strategies to recover from learning loss. In this article, we unpack opposing perspectives on these three controversies with the goal of extracting useful recommendations to guide post-pandemic education revival. Drawing from structural inequity theory, this article reviews the controversies through historical, current, and future lenses respectively: (1) Should we be talking about differential COVID learning loss? (2) Are we measuring COVID learning loss appropriately? and (3) Which recovery plans should we prioritize to address COVID learning loss? Within each controversy, the article makes suggestions on how practitioners may make sense of each controversy and integrate take-aways from them into their work.","PeriodicalId":48177,"journal":{"name":"Theory Into Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"300 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies behind COVID learning loss: Historical issues, current measurements, and future strategies\",\"authors\":\"Qiyang Zhang, N. Storey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00405841.2022.2096380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT COVID learning loss has sparked fierce debate among stakeholders in education. There are debates among concerned educators about ways to understand learning loss reports, methods to measure learning loss, and strategies to recover from learning loss. In this article, we unpack opposing perspectives on these three controversies with the goal of extracting useful recommendations to guide post-pandemic education revival. Drawing from structural inequity theory, this article reviews the controversies through historical, current, and future lenses respectively: (1) Should we be talking about differential COVID learning loss? (2) Are we measuring COVID learning loss appropriately? and (3) Which recovery plans should we prioritize to address COVID learning loss? Within each controversy, the article makes suggestions on how practitioners may make sense of each controversy and integrate take-aways from them into their work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"300 - 311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2096380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2096380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

COVID - 19导致的学习损失在教育利益相关者中引发了激烈的争论。教育工作者对如何理解学习损失报告、衡量学习损失的方法以及从学习损失中恢复的策略存在争论。在这篇文章中,我们剖析了这三个争议的对立观点,目的是提取有用的建议,以指导大流行后的教育复兴。本文从结构不平等理论出发,分别从历史、当前和未来的角度回顾了这些争议:(1)我们是否应该谈论差异的COVID学习损失?(2)我们是否适当地衡量COVID - 19的学习损失?(3)我们应该优先考虑哪些恢复计划来解决COVID - 19带来的学习损失?在每个争议中,文章就从业者如何理解每个争议并将其中的要点整合到他们的工作中提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies behind COVID learning loss: Historical issues, current measurements, and future strategies
ABSTRACT COVID learning loss has sparked fierce debate among stakeholders in education. There are debates among concerned educators about ways to understand learning loss reports, methods to measure learning loss, and strategies to recover from learning loss. In this article, we unpack opposing perspectives on these three controversies with the goal of extracting useful recommendations to guide post-pandemic education revival. Drawing from structural inequity theory, this article reviews the controversies through historical, current, and future lenses respectively: (1) Should we be talking about differential COVID learning loss? (2) Are we measuring COVID learning loss appropriately? and (3) Which recovery plans should we prioritize to address COVID learning loss? Within each controversy, the article makes suggestions on how practitioners may make sense of each controversy and integrate take-aways from them into their work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory Into Practice
Theory Into Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, Theory Into Practice (TIP) is a nationally recognized, peer reviewed journal featuring multiple perspectives and scholarly, yet practical and engaging, discussions of important issues in education. TIP publishes articles covering all levels and areas of education, including learning and teaching; counseling; assessment; teacher education and professional development; classroom management; administration and supervision; curriculum; policy; and technology. Each issue of TIP is devoted to a timely theme developed by a Guest Editor who has expertise in the theme area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信