私人租赁计划的合法性:蒙骗买家?

Q2 Social Sciences
Noraziah Abu Bakar, Ruzita Azmi
{"title":"私人租赁计划的合法性:蒙骗买家?","authors":"Noraziah Abu Bakar, Ruzita Azmi","doi":"10.21837/pm.v21i27.1288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The developer transferred a 99-year lease to the purchasers in a PLS instead of transferring the property ownership. Upon lease expiry, the property shall be reverted to the owner. In Malaysia, the Housing Development (Control & Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA 1966) regulates that a developer must transfer property ownership to the purchasers. \"Build and lease\" under the PLS does not comply with the law. This article is a conceptual paper that employs doctrinal research to analyse the legal position of property sale under a PLS and examine its compatibility with the existing law. The Courts' decisions on cases related to a PLS property are analysed to determine the PLS's implication on the purchasers' interest. Ultimately, to safeguard the purchasers, the amendment of the laws is recommended as a legal platform to legitimise the PLS.","PeriodicalId":38852,"journal":{"name":"Planning Malaysia","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE LEGALITY OF A PRIVATE LEASE SCHEME: PULL THE WOOL OVER THE PURCHASER’S EYES?\",\"authors\":\"Noraziah Abu Bakar, Ruzita Azmi\",\"doi\":\"10.21837/pm.v21i27.1288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The developer transferred a 99-year lease to the purchasers in a PLS instead of transferring the property ownership. Upon lease expiry, the property shall be reverted to the owner. In Malaysia, the Housing Development (Control & Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA 1966) regulates that a developer must transfer property ownership to the purchasers. \\\"Build and lease\\\" under the PLS does not comply with the law. This article is a conceptual paper that employs doctrinal research to analyse the legal position of property sale under a PLS and examine its compatibility with the existing law. The Courts' decisions on cases related to a PLS property are analysed to determine the PLS's implication on the purchasers' interest. Ultimately, to safeguard the purchasers, the amendment of the laws is recommended as a legal platform to legitimise the PLS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Malaysia\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发商将99年的租约以PLS形式转让给购买者,而不是转让物业所有权。租赁期满,财产归所有人所有。在马来西亚,1966年住房发展(控制和许可)法案(HDA 1966)规定开发商必须将财产所有权转让给购买者。在PLS下的“建造和租赁”不符合法律。本文是一篇概念性的论文,运用理论研究的方法来分析PLS制度下房产买卖的法律地位,并考察其与现行法律的兼容性。本研究分析法院对非置置财产案件的判决,以厘清非置置财产对购买者利益的影响。最后,为了保障购买者的利益,建议修改法律,为PLS的合法化提供法律平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE LEGALITY OF A PRIVATE LEASE SCHEME: PULL THE WOOL OVER THE PURCHASER’S EYES?
The developer transferred a 99-year lease to the purchasers in a PLS instead of transferring the property ownership. Upon lease expiry, the property shall be reverted to the owner. In Malaysia, the Housing Development (Control & Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA 1966) regulates that a developer must transfer property ownership to the purchasers. "Build and lease" under the PLS does not comply with the law. This article is a conceptual paper that employs doctrinal research to analyse the legal position of property sale under a PLS and examine its compatibility with the existing law. The Courts' decisions on cases related to a PLS property are analysed to determine the PLS's implication on the purchasers' interest. Ultimately, to safeguard the purchasers, the amendment of the laws is recommended as a legal platform to legitimise the PLS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Planning Malaysia
Planning Malaysia Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信