教学策略与职前教师数学焦虑及成绩关系的情境化研究

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Thomas J. Lipscomb, Janelle K. Lorenzen
{"title":"教学策略与职前教师数学焦虑及成绩关系的情境化研究","authors":"Thomas J. Lipscomb, Janelle K. Lorenzen","doi":"10.31756/jrsmte.612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The findings presented herein report the results of the qualitative portion of a sequential, convergent mixed methods study that focused on the effects of two instructional methods, Direct Instruction (DI) and Inquiry-based Learning (IBL), on pre-service teachers’ achievement and self-reported mathematics-related anxiety over the course of a semester. These qualitative findings are intended to add contextualization to the previously reported findings of the quasi-experimental phase of the investigation which found no statistically significant difference between groups in content mastery but found a statistically significant difference over the course of the semester in self-reported levels of mathematics-related anxiety between students who experienced the two different instructional methods. Implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44353,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextualization of the Relationship of Instructional Strategies to Preservice Teachers’ Math Anxiety and Achievement\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Lipscomb, Janelle K. Lorenzen\",\"doi\":\"10.31756/jrsmte.612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The findings presented herein report the results of the qualitative portion of a sequential, convergent mixed methods study that focused on the effects of two instructional methods, Direct Instruction (DI) and Inquiry-based Learning (IBL), on pre-service teachers’ achievement and self-reported mathematics-related anxiety over the course of a semester. These qualitative findings are intended to add contextualization to the previously reported findings of the quasi-experimental phase of the investigation which found no statistically significant difference between groups in content mastery but found a statistically significant difference over the course of the semester in self-reported levels of mathematics-related anxiety between students who experienced the two different instructional methods. Implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文的研究结果报告了一项连续的、收敛的混合方法研究的定性部分的结果,该研究主要关注直接教学(DI)和探究式学习(IBL)两种教学方法对职前教师在一个学期的课程中取得的成就和自我报告的数学相关焦虑的影响。这些定性研究结果旨在为之前报告的准实验阶段的研究结果提供背景分析,该研究发现各组之间在内容掌握方面没有统计学上的显著差异,但在经历两种不同教学方法的学生之间,自我报告的数学相关焦虑水平在整个学期中存在统计学上的显著差异。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contextualization of the Relationship of Instructional Strategies to Preservice Teachers’ Math Anxiety and Achievement
Abstract: The findings presented herein report the results of the qualitative portion of a sequential, convergent mixed methods study that focused on the effects of two instructional methods, Direct Instruction (DI) and Inquiry-based Learning (IBL), on pre-service teachers’ achievement and self-reported mathematics-related anxiety over the course of a semester. These qualitative findings are intended to add contextualization to the previously reported findings of the quasi-experimental phase of the investigation which found no statistically significant difference between groups in content mastery but found a statistically significant difference over the course of the semester in self-reported levels of mathematics-related anxiety between students who experienced the two different instructional methods. Implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The editorial policy of'' the African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (AJRMSTE) is to disseminate, as widely as possible, high quality research findings and well written articles on Curriculum Studies; Teacher Education; Education for Development; Mathematics Education; Science Education; Design & Technology Education and Computer Education. Articles that promote the understanding of curricular policy and diverse socio-cultural issues and those which stimulate epistemological and methodological debates are welcome. The editorial board welcomes articles that will contribute to the overall development of science, mathematics, technology and environmental education in Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信