鹰嘴豆和大车前草强化发酵土特产粉的近似和感官评价

Odion-Owase
{"title":"鹰嘴豆和大车前草强化发酵土特产粉的近似和感官评价","authors":"Odion-Owase","doi":"10.7176/fsqm/111-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fortified fermented local meal was produced from pigeon pea and unripe plantain. 50kg of pigeon pea was subjected to solid state method of fermentation for 72 hrs. Samples of meal were produced from fermented pigeon pea and unripe plantain at different ratios and labeled samples A, B and C. sample A had 10% fermented pigeon pea and 90% unripe plantain flour, sample B had 20% fermented pigeon pea and 80 % unripe plantain flour while sample C had 30% fermented pigeon pea and 70 % unripe plantain flour. The three samples were subjected to proximate and sensory evaluations. There was significant \\difference (p≤ 0.05) in the protein contents of the samples. Sample C had the highest protein content while sample A had the least. There was no significant difference (p≤ 0.05) in the moisture, crude fibre, ash contents of the samples. Sample C had the highest fat and least carbohydrate while sample A had the least fat and highest carbohydrate contents. The sensory evaluation result showed that sample C was most preferred while sample A was least preferred. However, there was no significant difference (p≤ 0.05) in the sensory parameters of the samples.","PeriodicalId":12384,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Quality Management","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximate and Sensory Evaluation of Fortified Fermented Local Meal from Pigeon Pea (CAJANUS CAJAN) and Unripe Plantain\",\"authors\":\"Odion-Owase\",\"doi\":\"10.7176/fsqm/111-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fortified fermented local meal was produced from pigeon pea and unripe plantain. 50kg of pigeon pea was subjected to solid state method of fermentation for 72 hrs. Samples of meal were produced from fermented pigeon pea and unripe plantain at different ratios and labeled samples A, B and C. sample A had 10% fermented pigeon pea and 90% unripe plantain flour, sample B had 20% fermented pigeon pea and 80 % unripe plantain flour while sample C had 30% fermented pigeon pea and 70 % unripe plantain flour. The three samples were subjected to proximate and sensory evaluations. There was significant \\\\difference (p≤ 0.05) in the protein contents of the samples. Sample C had the highest protein content while sample A had the least. There was no significant difference (p≤ 0.05) in the moisture, crude fibre, ash contents of the samples. Sample C had the highest fat and least carbohydrate while sample A had the least fat and highest carbohydrate contents. The sensory evaluation result showed that sample C was most preferred while sample A was least preferred. However, there was no significant difference (p≤ 0.05) in the sensory parameters of the samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7176/fsqm/111-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/fsqm/111-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一种由鸽豆和未成熟的大车前草制成的强化发酵当地膳食。取50kg鸽豆进行固态发酵72h。以不同比例的发酵鸽豆和未成熟的车前草制成样品,并标记样品A、B和C。样品A含有10%的发酵鸽豆和90%的未成熟车前草粉,样品B含有20%的发酵鸽豆和80%的未成熟车前草粉,样品C含有30%的发酵鸽豆和70%的未成熟车前草粉。这三个样本进行了近似和感官评估。各样品蛋白质含量差异有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。样品C的蛋白质含量最高,样品A的蛋白质含量最低。样品的水分、粗纤维、灰分含量差异不显著(p≤0.05)。样品C脂肪含量最高,碳水化合物含量最少,样品A脂肪含量最低,碳水化合物含量最高。感官评价结果表明,样品C最受青睐,样品A最不受青睐。但两组的感官参数差异无统计学意义(p≤0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proximate and Sensory Evaluation of Fortified Fermented Local Meal from Pigeon Pea (CAJANUS CAJAN) and Unripe Plantain
A fortified fermented local meal was produced from pigeon pea and unripe plantain. 50kg of pigeon pea was subjected to solid state method of fermentation for 72 hrs. Samples of meal were produced from fermented pigeon pea and unripe plantain at different ratios and labeled samples A, B and C. sample A had 10% fermented pigeon pea and 90% unripe plantain flour, sample B had 20% fermented pigeon pea and 80 % unripe plantain flour while sample C had 30% fermented pigeon pea and 70 % unripe plantain flour. The three samples were subjected to proximate and sensory evaluations. There was significant \difference (p≤ 0.05) in the protein contents of the samples. Sample C had the highest protein content while sample A had the least. There was no significant difference (p≤ 0.05) in the moisture, crude fibre, ash contents of the samples. Sample C had the highest fat and least carbohydrate while sample A had the least fat and highest carbohydrate contents. The sensory evaluation result showed that sample C was most preferred while sample A was least preferred. However, there was no significant difference (p≤ 0.05) in the sensory parameters of the samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信