支持从小学到专业的自我效能发展:教育工作者指南

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Usher, Amanda R. Butz, Xiao-Yin Chen, C. Ford, Jaeyun Han, N. A. Mamaril, David B. Morris, Pilvi Peura, Raven R. Piercey
{"title":"支持从小学到专业的自我效能发展:教育工作者指南","authors":"E. Usher, Amanda R. Butz, Xiao-Yin Chen, C. Ford, Jaeyun Han, N. A. Mamaril, David B. Morris, Pilvi Peura, Raven R. Piercey","doi":"10.1080/00405841.2023.2226559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the past 2 decades, scholars in various educational contexts have examined Bandura’s theorizing about how self-efficacy develops. Bandura proposed 4 primary informational sources of self-efficacy—enactive experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions, and physiological and affective states—each of which can be supported in different ways. This article first defines and situates self-efficacy and these sources within a broader social cognitive theoretical frame. Subsequent sections highlight specific ways that educators can apply insights from Bandura’s theorizing and from the empirical literature that has examined self-efficacy development at different stages of learning and in diverse contexts. We address how educators can create instructional tasks that show progress, establish supportive social structures, and work with students’ emotions in ways that foster self-efficacy. Special attention is given to the sociocultural factors that affect how learners evaluate efficacy-relevant information. Several directions for further applying Bandura’s theory are offered.","PeriodicalId":48177,"journal":{"name":"Theory Into Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting self-efficacy development from primary school to the professions: A guide for educators\",\"authors\":\"E. Usher, Amanda R. Butz, Xiao-Yin Chen, C. Ford, Jaeyun Han, N. A. Mamaril, David B. Morris, Pilvi Peura, Raven R. Piercey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00405841.2023.2226559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Over the past 2 decades, scholars in various educational contexts have examined Bandura’s theorizing about how self-efficacy develops. Bandura proposed 4 primary informational sources of self-efficacy—enactive experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions, and physiological and affective states—each of which can be supported in different ways. This article first defines and situates self-efficacy and these sources within a broader social cognitive theoretical frame. Subsequent sections highlight specific ways that educators can apply insights from Bandura’s theorizing and from the empirical literature that has examined self-efficacy development at different stages of learning and in diverse contexts. We address how educators can create instructional tasks that show progress, establish supportive social structures, and work with students’ emotions in ways that foster self-efficacy. Special attention is given to the sociocultural factors that affect how learners evaluate efficacy-relevant information. Several directions for further applying Bandura’s theory are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2226559\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2226559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的二十年里,不同教育背景下的学者对班杜拉关于自我效能感如何发展的理论进行了研究。班杜拉提出了自我效能感的4种主要信息源——行动体验、替代体验、社会说服、生理和情感状态——每一种都可以通过不同的方式得到支持。本文首先在一个更广泛的社会认知理论框架中定义和定位自我效能感和这些来源。接下来的部分强调了教育工作者可以运用班杜拉的理论和实证文献中的见解的具体方法,这些文献研究了不同学习阶段和不同背景下的自我效能发展。我们讨论教育工作者如何创造教学任务,展示进步,建立支持性的社会结构,并以培养自我效能感的方式处理学生的情绪。特别关注影响学习者如何评价效能相关信息的社会文化因素。提出了进一步应用班杜拉理论的几个方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting self-efficacy development from primary school to the professions: A guide for educators
ABSTRACT Over the past 2 decades, scholars in various educational contexts have examined Bandura’s theorizing about how self-efficacy develops. Bandura proposed 4 primary informational sources of self-efficacy—enactive experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions, and physiological and affective states—each of which can be supported in different ways. This article first defines and situates self-efficacy and these sources within a broader social cognitive theoretical frame. Subsequent sections highlight specific ways that educators can apply insights from Bandura’s theorizing and from the empirical literature that has examined self-efficacy development at different stages of learning and in diverse contexts. We address how educators can create instructional tasks that show progress, establish supportive social structures, and work with students’ emotions in ways that foster self-efficacy. Special attention is given to the sociocultural factors that affect how learners evaluate efficacy-relevant information. Several directions for further applying Bandura’s theory are offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory Into Practice
Theory Into Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, Theory Into Practice (TIP) is a nationally recognized, peer reviewed journal featuring multiple perspectives and scholarly, yet practical and engaging, discussions of important issues in education. TIP publishes articles covering all levels and areas of education, including learning and teaching; counseling; assessment; teacher education and professional development; classroom management; administration and supervision; curriculum; policy; and technology. Each issue of TIP is devoted to a timely theme developed by a Guest Editor who has expertise in the theme area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信