{"title":"不可教之人:残疾人权利与黑人特殊教育的发明","authors":"Stuart Bracewell","doi":"10.1080/00131911.2023.2236366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overrepresentation of Black students in subjective disability categories, specifically emotional/behavioral disturbance (E/BD), intellectual disability (ID)—previously referred to as educable mentally retarded (EMR), and learning disability (LD), as well as in disciplinary practices such as suspension and expulsion, is an enduring challenge within the U.S. education system (Losen & Orfield, 2002). Despite extensive efforts by scholars, policymakers, and educators at various levels, the issue continues to persist.","PeriodicalId":47755,"journal":{"name":"Educational Review","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The unteachables: disability rights and the invention of black special education\",\"authors\":\"Stuart Bracewell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131911.2023.2236366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overrepresentation of Black students in subjective disability categories, specifically emotional/behavioral disturbance (E/BD), intellectual disability (ID)—previously referred to as educable mentally retarded (EMR), and learning disability (LD), as well as in disciplinary practices such as suspension and expulsion, is an enduring challenge within the U.S. education system (Losen & Orfield, 2002). Despite extensive efforts by scholars, policymakers, and educators at various levels, the issue continues to persist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Review\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2236366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2236366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The unteachables: disability rights and the invention of black special education
The overrepresentation of Black students in subjective disability categories, specifically emotional/behavioral disturbance (E/BD), intellectual disability (ID)—previously referred to as educable mentally retarded (EMR), and learning disability (LD), as well as in disciplinary practices such as suspension and expulsion, is an enduring challenge within the U.S. education system (Losen & Orfield, 2002). Despite extensive efforts by scholars, policymakers, and educators at various levels, the issue continues to persist.
期刊介绍:
Educational Review is a leading journal for generic educational research and scholarship. For over seventy years it has offered scholarly analyses of global issues in all phases of education, formal and informal. It publishes peer-reviewed papers from international contributors across a range of education fields and or perspectives including pedagogy and the curriculum, history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, international and comparative education and educational leadership. Articles offer original insights to formal and informal educational policy, provision, processes and practice and the experiences of all those involved in many countries around the world. The editors welcome high quality, original papers which encourage and enhance debate on social justice and critical enquiry in education, besides innovative new theoretical and methodological scholarship. The journal offers six editions a year. The Board invites proposals for special editions as well as commissioning them.