多次阻力训练对力量表现和上半身无氧能力的影响:3288板#353,6月3日下午3:30 - 5:00。

T. Tsao, Kai Shiau, Ching Bing Yang
{"title":"多次阻力训练对力量表现和上半身无氧能力的影响:3288板#353,6月3日下午3:30 - 5:00。","authors":"T. Tsao, Kai Shiau, Ching Bing Yang","doi":"10.1249/01.mss.0000487822.22397.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE:Many believe that routine excercises in Wushu routine (Kungfu) are mere acrobatics and have no fighting value compared to other martial arts. The aim of this study was to compare the straight punch force between Wushu and other martial artists. METHODS:35 male college students who have equal sport experiences were eligible for this study. Boxing n=7, San Da (Chinese Sparring) n=7, Wushu routine n=7, Karate n=7, control group (College Physical education students) n=7 took part in this trial. Subjects age were 21±1 years old, weight 66.7±6.4 kg, height 1.71±0.23 cm. Except for the control group, the average of training years was 6±3 years. Subjects were asked to deliver a straight punch under 2 conditions. 1) A free punch was tested for subjects’ maximum punch force. 2) A reaction punch with a signal was used to test subjects’ reaction and punch force. A punch test device was used to collect punch force and acceleration. The sampling frequency of force and acceleration was 10,000 Hz respectively. Subjects test order was randomized prior to the experiment begin. Punch force was normalization. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. ANOVA repeat measures were used to compare the differences of two punch conditions and groups. Data were reported as mean values (SD), and the significance level was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS:The results showed that the maximum punch force was highest for boxers (2689 N), followed by practitioners of San Da (2653 N), Wushu routine (2258 N), karate (1914 N) and PE students (1380 N). The results for the reactive punch force showed slight differences with San Da players (2532 N) now scoring higher than boxers (2481 N). Also for the free punch acceleration the highest scores were registrered among San Da players (122 m/s2), followed by Wushu routine (119 m/s2), boxing (113 m/s2), karate (89 m/s2) and the control group (68 m/s2). The same order was found for the reactive acceleration: San Da (122 m/s2), Wushu routine (119 m/s2), Boxing (113 m/s2), Karate (89 m/s2) and the control group (68 m/s2). CONCLUSIONS:This comparison indicated that the straight punch force of Wushu routine was lower than that of boxing and San Da, but higher than that of karate and P.E students. Wushu routine is a promising self-defense sport that can be known by more people.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Multiple Sessions of Resistance Training on Strength Performance and Anaerobic Capacity of the Upper Body: 3288 Board #353 June 3, 3: 30 PM - 5: 00 PM.\",\"authors\":\"T. Tsao, Kai Shiau, Ching Bing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/01.mss.0000487822.22397.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE:Many believe that routine excercises in Wushu routine (Kungfu) are mere acrobatics and have no fighting value compared to other martial arts. The aim of this study was to compare the straight punch force between Wushu and other martial artists. METHODS:35 male college students who have equal sport experiences were eligible for this study. Boxing n=7, San Da (Chinese Sparring) n=7, Wushu routine n=7, Karate n=7, control group (College Physical education students) n=7 took part in this trial. Subjects age were 21±1 years old, weight 66.7±6.4 kg, height 1.71±0.23 cm. Except for the control group, the average of training years was 6±3 years. Subjects were asked to deliver a straight punch under 2 conditions. 1) A free punch was tested for subjects’ maximum punch force. 2) A reaction punch with a signal was used to test subjects’ reaction and punch force. A punch test device was used to collect punch force and acceleration. The sampling frequency of force and acceleration was 10,000 Hz respectively. Subjects test order was randomized prior to the experiment begin. Punch force was normalization. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. ANOVA repeat measures were used to compare the differences of two punch conditions and groups. Data were reported as mean values (SD), and the significance level was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS:The results showed that the maximum punch force was highest for boxers (2689 N), followed by practitioners of San Da (2653 N), Wushu routine (2258 N), karate (1914 N) and PE students (1380 N). The results for the reactive punch force showed slight differences with San Da players (2532 N) now scoring higher than boxers (2481 N). Also for the free punch acceleration the highest scores were registrered among San Da players (122 m/s2), followed by Wushu routine (119 m/s2), boxing (113 m/s2), karate (89 m/s2) and the control group (68 m/s2). The same order was found for the reactive acceleration: San Da (122 m/s2), Wushu routine (119 m/s2), Boxing (113 m/s2), Karate (89 m/s2) and the control group (68 m/s2). CONCLUSIONS:This comparison indicated that the straight punch force of Wushu routine was lower than that of boxing and San Da, but higher than that of karate and P.E students. Wushu routine is a promising self-defense sport that can be known by more people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000487822.22397.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000487822.22397.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:很多人认为武术套路(功夫)中的套路动作是纯粹的杂技,与其他武术相比没有格斗价值。本研究的目的是比较武术与其他武术艺术家的直拳力量。方法:选取35名具有同等运动经历的男大学生为研究对象。拳击n=7,散打n=7,武术套路n=7,空手道n=7,对照组(高校体育专业学生)n=7。年龄21±1岁,体重66.7±6.4 kg,身高1.71±0.23 cm。除对照组外,平均训练年限为6±3年。受试者被要求在两种情况下直接出拳。1)自由击打测试被试的最大击打力。2)用带有信号的反应冲床测试被试的反应和冲床力。采用冲孔试验装置采集冲孔力和加速度。力和加速度的采样频率分别为10000 Hz。受试者的测试顺序在实验开始前随机化。冲力归一化。采用SPSS 19.0进行统计学分析。采用方差分析重复测量法比较两个打孔条件和组间的差异。数据以平均值(SD)报告,显著性水平设为p < 0.05。结果:拳击运动员最大出拳力最高(2689 N),其次是散打运动员(2653 N)、武术套路(2258 N)、空手道(1914 N)和体育学生(1380 N),反作用出拳力与散打运动员(2532 N)差异不大,目前得分高于拳击手(2481 N),自由出拳加速度得分最高的是散打运动员(122 m/s2),其次是武术套路(119 m/s2);拳击113米/秒,空手道89米/秒,对照组68米/秒。反应加速度顺序依次为:散打(122 m/s2)、武术(119 m/s2)、拳击(113 m/s2)、空手道(89 m/s2)和对照组(68 m/s2)。结论:武术套路的直拳力低于拳击和散打,但高于空手道和体育学生。武术套路是一项很有发展前途的防身运动,可以为更多的人所熟知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Multiple Sessions of Resistance Training on Strength Performance and Anaerobic Capacity of the Upper Body: 3288 Board #353 June 3, 3: 30 PM - 5: 00 PM.
PURPOSE:Many believe that routine excercises in Wushu routine (Kungfu) are mere acrobatics and have no fighting value compared to other martial arts. The aim of this study was to compare the straight punch force between Wushu and other martial artists. METHODS:35 male college students who have equal sport experiences were eligible for this study. Boxing n=7, San Da (Chinese Sparring) n=7, Wushu routine n=7, Karate n=7, control group (College Physical education students) n=7 took part in this trial. Subjects age were 21±1 years old, weight 66.7±6.4 kg, height 1.71±0.23 cm. Except for the control group, the average of training years was 6±3 years. Subjects were asked to deliver a straight punch under 2 conditions. 1) A free punch was tested for subjects’ maximum punch force. 2) A reaction punch with a signal was used to test subjects’ reaction and punch force. A punch test device was used to collect punch force and acceleration. The sampling frequency of force and acceleration was 10,000 Hz respectively. Subjects test order was randomized prior to the experiment begin. Punch force was normalization. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. ANOVA repeat measures were used to compare the differences of two punch conditions and groups. Data were reported as mean values (SD), and the significance level was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS:The results showed that the maximum punch force was highest for boxers (2689 N), followed by practitioners of San Da (2653 N), Wushu routine (2258 N), karate (1914 N) and PE students (1380 N). The results for the reactive punch force showed slight differences with San Da players (2532 N) now scoring higher than boxers (2481 N). Also for the free punch acceleration the highest scores were registrered among San Da players (122 m/s2), followed by Wushu routine (119 m/s2), boxing (113 m/s2), karate (89 m/s2) and the control group (68 m/s2). The same order was found for the reactive acceleration: San Da (122 m/s2), Wushu routine (119 m/s2), Boxing (113 m/s2), Karate (89 m/s2) and the control group (68 m/s2). CONCLUSIONS:This comparison indicated that the straight punch force of Wushu routine was lower than that of boxing and San Da, but higher than that of karate and P.E students. Wushu routine is a promising self-defense sport that can be known by more people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信