Brittany A. Ernst , George C. Banks , Andrew C. Loignon , Katherine A. Frear , Courtney E. Williams , Luis M. Arciniega , Roopak K. Gupta , Georg Kodydek , Dilip Subramanian
{"title":"虚拟魅力型领导与信号理论:五国的前瞻性元分析","authors":"Brittany A. Ernst , George C. Banks , Andrew C. Loignon , Katherine A. Frear , Courtney E. Williams , Luis M. Arciniega , Roopak K. Gupta , Georg Kodydek , Dilip Subramanian","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Drawing upon signaling theory, charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been identified as a trainable set of skills. Although organizations rely on technology-mediated communication, the effects of CLTs have not been examined in a virtual context. Preregistered experiments were conducted in face-to-face (Study 1; </span><em>n</em> = 121) and virtual settings (Study 2; <em>n</em> = 128) in the United States. In Study 3, we conducted virtual replications in Austria (<em>n</em> = 134), France (<em>n</em> = 137), India (<em>n</em> = 128), and Mexico (<em>n</em> = 124). Combined with past experiments, the meta-analytic effect of CLTs on performance (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.52 in-person, <em>k</em> = 4; Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.21 overall, <em>k</em> = 10) and engagement in an extra-role task (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.19 overall; <em>k</em> = 6) indicate large to moderate effects. Yet, for performance in a virtual context Cohen’s <em>d</em> ranged from −0.25 to 0.17 (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.01 overall; <em>k</em> = 6). Study 4 (<em>n</em> = 129) provided mixed support for signaling theory in a virtual context, linking CLTs to some positive evaluations. We conclude with guidance for future research on charismatic leadership and signaling theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"33 5","pages":"Article 101541"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: A prospective meta-analysis in five countries\",\"authors\":\"Brittany A. Ernst , George C. Banks , Andrew C. Loignon , Katherine A. Frear , Courtney E. Williams , Luis M. Arciniega , Roopak K. Gupta , Georg Kodydek , Dilip Subramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Drawing upon signaling theory, charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been identified as a trainable set of skills. Although organizations rely on technology-mediated communication, the effects of CLTs have not been examined in a virtual context. Preregistered experiments were conducted in face-to-face (Study 1; </span><em>n</em> = 121) and virtual settings (Study 2; <em>n</em> = 128) in the United States. In Study 3, we conducted virtual replications in Austria (<em>n</em> = 134), France (<em>n</em> = 137), India (<em>n</em> = 128), and Mexico (<em>n</em> = 124). Combined with past experiments, the meta-analytic effect of CLTs on performance (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.52 in-person, <em>k</em> = 4; Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.21 overall, <em>k</em> = 10) and engagement in an extra-role task (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.19 overall; <em>k</em> = 6) indicate large to moderate effects. Yet, for performance in a virtual context Cohen’s <em>d</em> ranged from −0.25 to 0.17 (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.01 overall; <em>k</em> = 6). Study 4 (<em>n</em> = 129) provided mixed support for signaling theory in a virtual context, linking CLTs to some positive evaluations. We conclude with guidance for future research on charismatic leadership and signaling theory.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000461\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
根据信号理论,魅力型领导策略(clt)已被确定为一套可训练的技能。虽然组织依赖于以技术为媒介的沟通,但clt的影响尚未在虚拟环境中得到检验。面对面进行预注册实验(研究1;n = 121)和虚拟设置(研究2;n = 128)。在研究3中,我们在奥地利(n = 134)、法国(n = 137)、印度(n = 128)和墨西哥(n = 124)进行了虚拟复制。结合以往的实验,clt对绩效的meta分析效应(Cohen’s d = 0.52, k = 4;科恩的总体d = 0.21, k = 10)和角色外任务的参与度(科恩的总体d = 0.19;K = 6)表明效果大到中等。然而,对于虚拟环境中的表现,Cohen’s d的范围从- 0.25到0.17 (Cohen’s d = 0.01;k = 6)。研究4 (n = 129)在虚拟环境中为信号理论提供了混合支持,将clt与一些积极评价联系起来。最后,对魅力型领导和信号理论的未来研究提出了指导意见。
Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: A prospective meta-analysis in five countries
Drawing upon signaling theory, charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been identified as a trainable set of skills. Although organizations rely on technology-mediated communication, the effects of CLTs have not been examined in a virtual context. Preregistered experiments were conducted in face-to-face (Study 1; n = 121) and virtual settings (Study 2; n = 128) in the United States. In Study 3, we conducted virtual replications in Austria (n = 134), France (n = 137), India (n = 128), and Mexico (n = 124). Combined with past experiments, the meta-analytic effect of CLTs on performance (Cohen’s d = 0.52 in-person, k = 4; Cohen’s d = 0.21 overall, k = 10) and engagement in an extra-role task (Cohen’s d = 0.19 overall; k = 6) indicate large to moderate effects. Yet, for performance in a virtual context Cohen’s d ranged from −0.25 to 0.17 (Cohen’s d = 0.01 overall; k = 6). Study 4 (n = 129) provided mixed support for signaling theory in a virtual context, linking CLTs to some positive evaluations. We conclude with guidance for future research on charismatic leadership and signaling theory.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.