Jiafu Li*, Zengli Zhang, Md. Tareq Aziz, Caroline O. Granger, Zhimin Qiang, Susan D. Richardson and Huiyu Dong*,
{"title":"饮用水中可控和非可控优先消毒副产物的简易灵敏同步定量方法","authors":"Jiafu Li*, Zengli Zhang, Md. Tareq Aziz, Caroline O. Granger, Zhimin Qiang, Susan D. Richardson and Huiyu Dong*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Due to their elevated concentrations in drinking water, compared to other emerging environmental contaminants, disinfection byproducts (DBPs) have become a global concern. To address this, we have created a simple and sensitive method for simultaneously measuring 9 classes of DBPs. Haloacetic acids (HAAs) and iodo-acetic acids (IAAs) are determined using silylation derivatization, replacing diazomethane or acidic methanol derivatization with a more environmentally friendly and simpler treatment process that also offers greater sensitivity. Mono-/di-haloacetaldehydes (mono-/di-HALs) are directly analyzed without derivatization, along with trihalomethanes (THMs), iodo-THMs, haloketones, haloacetonitriles, haloacetamides, and halonitromethanes. Of the 50 DBPs studied, recoveries for most were 70–130%, LOQs for most were 0.01–0.05 μg/L, and relative standard deviations were <30%. We subsequently applied this method to 13 home tap water samples. Total concentrations of 9 classes of DBPs were 39.6–79.2 μg/L, in which unregulated priority DBPs contributed 42% of total DBP concentrations and 97% of total calculated cytotoxicity, highlighting the importance of monitoring their presence in drinking water. Br-DBPs were the dominant contributors to total DBPs (54%) and total calculated cytotoxicity (92%). Nitrogenous DBPs contributed 25% of total DBPs while inducing 57% of total calculated cytotoxicity. HALs were the most important toxicity drivers (40%), particularly four mono-/di-HALs, which induced 28% of total calculated cytotoxicity. This simple and sensitive method allows the synchronous analysis of 9 classes of regulated and unregulated priority DBPs and overcomes the weaknesses of some other methods especially for HAAs/IAAs and mono-/di-HALs, providing a useful tool for research on regulated and unregulated priority DBPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"95 29","pages":"10975–10983"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simple and Sensitive Method for Synchronous Quantification of Regulated and Unregulated Priority Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water\",\"authors\":\"Jiafu Li*, Zengli Zhang, Md. Tareq Aziz, Caroline O. Granger, Zhimin Qiang, Susan D. Richardson and Huiyu Dong*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Due to their elevated concentrations in drinking water, compared to other emerging environmental contaminants, disinfection byproducts (DBPs) have become a global concern. To address this, we have created a simple and sensitive method for simultaneously measuring 9 classes of DBPs. Haloacetic acids (HAAs) and iodo-acetic acids (IAAs) are determined using silylation derivatization, replacing diazomethane or acidic methanol derivatization with a more environmentally friendly and simpler treatment process that also offers greater sensitivity. Mono-/di-haloacetaldehydes (mono-/di-HALs) are directly analyzed without derivatization, along with trihalomethanes (THMs), iodo-THMs, haloketones, haloacetonitriles, haloacetamides, and halonitromethanes. Of the 50 DBPs studied, recoveries for most were 70–130%, LOQs for most were 0.01–0.05 μg/L, and relative standard deviations were <30%. We subsequently applied this method to 13 home tap water samples. Total concentrations of 9 classes of DBPs were 39.6–79.2 μg/L, in which unregulated priority DBPs contributed 42% of total DBP concentrations and 97% of total calculated cytotoxicity, highlighting the importance of monitoring their presence in drinking water. Br-DBPs were the dominant contributors to total DBPs (54%) and total calculated cytotoxicity (92%). Nitrogenous DBPs contributed 25% of total DBPs while inducing 57% of total calculated cytotoxicity. HALs were the most important toxicity drivers (40%), particularly four mono-/di-HALs, which induced 28% of total calculated cytotoxicity. This simple and sensitive method allows the synchronous analysis of 9 classes of regulated and unregulated priority DBPs and overcomes the weaknesses of some other methods especially for HAAs/IAAs and mono-/di-HALs, providing a useful tool for research on regulated and unregulated priority DBPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"95 29\",\"pages\":\"10975–10983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simple and Sensitive Method for Synchronous Quantification of Regulated and Unregulated Priority Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water
Due to their elevated concentrations in drinking water, compared to other emerging environmental contaminants, disinfection byproducts (DBPs) have become a global concern. To address this, we have created a simple and sensitive method for simultaneously measuring 9 classes of DBPs. Haloacetic acids (HAAs) and iodo-acetic acids (IAAs) are determined using silylation derivatization, replacing diazomethane or acidic methanol derivatization with a more environmentally friendly and simpler treatment process that also offers greater sensitivity. Mono-/di-haloacetaldehydes (mono-/di-HALs) are directly analyzed without derivatization, along with trihalomethanes (THMs), iodo-THMs, haloketones, haloacetonitriles, haloacetamides, and halonitromethanes. Of the 50 DBPs studied, recoveries for most were 70–130%, LOQs for most were 0.01–0.05 μg/L, and relative standard deviations were <30%. We subsequently applied this method to 13 home tap water samples. Total concentrations of 9 classes of DBPs were 39.6–79.2 μg/L, in which unregulated priority DBPs contributed 42% of total DBP concentrations and 97% of total calculated cytotoxicity, highlighting the importance of monitoring their presence in drinking water. Br-DBPs were the dominant contributors to total DBPs (54%) and total calculated cytotoxicity (92%). Nitrogenous DBPs contributed 25% of total DBPs while inducing 57% of total calculated cytotoxicity. HALs were the most important toxicity drivers (40%), particularly four mono-/di-HALs, which induced 28% of total calculated cytotoxicity. This simple and sensitive method allows the synchronous analysis of 9 classes of regulated and unregulated priority DBPs and overcomes the weaknesses of some other methods especially for HAAs/IAAs and mono-/di-HALs, providing a useful tool for research on regulated and unregulated priority DBPs.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.