光学相干断层扫描治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿

IF 18.6 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Simon KH. Szeto , Timothy YY. Lai , Stela Vujosevic , Jennifer K. Sun , SriniVas R. Sadda , Gavin Tan , Sobha Sivaprasad , Tien Y. Wong , Carol Y. Cheung
{"title":"光学相干断层扫描治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿","authors":"Simon KH. Szeto ,&nbsp;Timothy YY. Lai ,&nbsp;Stela Vujosevic ,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Sun ,&nbsp;SriniVas R. Sadda ,&nbsp;Gavin Tan ,&nbsp;Sobha Sivaprasad ,&nbsp;Tien Y. Wong ,&nbsp;Carol Y. Cheung","doi":"10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Diabetic macular oedema<span> (DMO) is the major cause of visual impairment<span> in people with diabetes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is now the most widely used modality to assess presence and severity of DMO. DMO is currently broadly classified based on the involvement to the central 1 mm of the macula into non-centre or centre involved DMO (CI-DMO) and DMO can occur with or without </span></span></span>visual acuity<span> (VA) loss. This classification forms the basis of management strategies of DMO. Despite years of research on quantitative and qualitative DMO related features assessed by OCT, these do not fully inform physicians of the prognosis and severity of DMO relative to visual function. Having said that, recent research on novel OCT biomarkers development and re-defined classification of DMO show better correlation with visual function and treatment response.</span></p><p>This review summarises the current evidence of the association of OCT biomarkers in DMO management and its potential clinical importance in predicting VA and anatomical treatment response. The review also discusses some future directions in this field, such as the use of artificial intelligence to quantify and monitor OCT biomarkers and retinal fluid and identify phenotypes of DMO, and the need for standardisation and classification of OCT biomarkers to use in future clinical trials and clinical practice settings as prognostic markers and secondary treatment outcome measures in the management of DMO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21159,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101220"},"PeriodicalIF":18.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical coherence tomography in the management of diabetic macular oedema\",\"authors\":\"Simon KH. Szeto ,&nbsp;Timothy YY. Lai ,&nbsp;Stela Vujosevic ,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Sun ,&nbsp;SriniVas R. Sadda ,&nbsp;Gavin Tan ,&nbsp;Sobha Sivaprasad ,&nbsp;Tien Y. Wong ,&nbsp;Carol Y. Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Diabetic macular oedema<span> (DMO) is the major cause of visual impairment<span> in people with diabetes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is now the most widely used modality to assess presence and severity of DMO. DMO is currently broadly classified based on the involvement to the central 1 mm of the macula into non-centre or centre involved DMO (CI-DMO) and DMO can occur with or without </span></span></span>visual acuity<span> (VA) loss. This classification forms the basis of management strategies of DMO. Despite years of research on quantitative and qualitative DMO related features assessed by OCT, these do not fully inform physicians of the prognosis and severity of DMO relative to visual function. Having said that, recent research on novel OCT biomarkers development and re-defined classification of DMO show better correlation with visual function and treatment response.</span></p><p>This review summarises the current evidence of the association of OCT biomarkers in DMO management and its potential clinical importance in predicting VA and anatomical treatment response. The review also discusses some future directions in this field, such as the use of artificial intelligence to quantify and monitor OCT biomarkers and retinal fluid and identify phenotypes of DMO, and the need for standardisation and classification of OCT biomarkers to use in future clinical trials and clinical practice settings as prognostic markers and secondary treatment outcome measures in the management of DMO.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350946223000599\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350946223000599","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)是糖尿病患者视力受损的主要原因。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)是目前最广泛使用的评估DMO存在和严重程度的方法。DMO目前根据对中央1的参与程度进行了广泛分类 mm的黄斑变为非中心或中心受累DMO(CI-DMO),DMO可在视力(VA)丧失或不丧失的情况下发生。这种分类构成了DMO管理策略的基础。尽管OCT对DMO相关的定量和定性特征进行了多年的研究,但这些特征并不能完全告知医生DMO相对于视觉功能的预后和严重程度。话虽如此,最近关于新型OCT生物标志物开发和DMO重新定义分类的研究表明,DMO与视觉功能和治疗反应具有更好的相关性。这篇综述总结了OCT生物标志物在DMO管理中的相关性及其在预测VA和解剖治疗反应中的潜在临床重要性的最新证据。该综述还讨论了该领域的一些未来方向,例如使用人工智能来量化和监测OCT生物标志物和视网膜液,并识别DMO的表型,以及OCT生物标志物的标准化和分类的必要性,以在未来的临床试验和临床实践环境中用作DMO管理中的预后标志物和二次治疗结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optical coherence tomography in the management of diabetic macular oedema

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the major cause of visual impairment in people with diabetes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is now the most widely used modality to assess presence and severity of DMO. DMO is currently broadly classified based on the involvement to the central 1 mm of the macula into non-centre or centre involved DMO (CI-DMO) and DMO can occur with or without visual acuity (VA) loss. This classification forms the basis of management strategies of DMO. Despite years of research on quantitative and qualitative DMO related features assessed by OCT, these do not fully inform physicians of the prognosis and severity of DMO relative to visual function. Having said that, recent research on novel OCT biomarkers development and re-defined classification of DMO show better correlation with visual function and treatment response.

This review summarises the current evidence of the association of OCT biomarkers in DMO management and its potential clinical importance in predicting VA and anatomical treatment response. The review also discusses some future directions in this field, such as the use of artificial intelligence to quantify and monitor OCT biomarkers and retinal fluid and identify phenotypes of DMO, and the need for standardisation and classification of OCT biomarkers to use in future clinical trials and clinical practice settings as prognostic markers and secondary treatment outcome measures in the management of DMO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
34.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Progress in Retinal and Eye Research is a Reviews-only journal. By invitation, leading experts write on basic and clinical aspects of the eye in a style appealing to molecular biologists, neuroscientists and physiologists, as well as to vision researchers and ophthalmologists. The journal covers all aspects of eye research, including topics pertaining to the retina and pigment epithelial layer, cornea, tears, lacrimal glands, aqueous humour, iris, ciliary body, trabeculum, lens, vitreous humour and diseases such as dry-eye, inflammation, keratoconus, corneal dystrophy, glaucoma and cataract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信