数学成绩、态度和焦虑之间的性别差异和相似性:一项七至九年级的纵向研究。

IF 5.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1037/edu0000793
David C Geary, Mary K Hoard, Lara Nugent, Zehra E Ünal, Nathaniel R Greene
{"title":"数学成绩、态度和焦虑之间的性别差异和相似性:一项七至九年级的纵向研究。","authors":"David C Geary, Mary K Hoard, Lara Nugent, Zehra E Ünal, Nathaniel R Greene","doi":"10.1037/edu0000793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are consistent correlations between mathematics achievement, attitudes, and anxiety, but the longitudinal relations among these constructs are not well understood nor are sex differences in these relations. To address this gap, mathematics achievement, attitudes, and anxiety were longitudinally assessed for 342 (169 boys) adolescents from 7th to 9th grade, inclusive, and Latent Growth Curve Models were used to assess the relations among these traits and developmental change in them. Spatial abilities (7th, 8th grade) and trait anxiety (8th, 9th grade) were also assessed and used for control for sex differences in these traits. Overall, boys had stronger spatial abilities and more positive mathematics attitudes and were less anxious than girls, but there were no sex differences in mathematics achievement. Across grades, mathematics achievement improved, attitudes became less positive, and anxiety increased for both boys and girls. Higher than average cross-grade growth in mathematics achievement mitigated boys' developmental declines in mathematics attitudes and increases in anxiety. Girls with strong spatial abilities had lower mathematics anxiety, but girls overall maintained higher mathematics anxiety and less positive mathematics attitudes relative to boys, even when they showed strong cross-grade gains in mathematics achievement. The study demonstrated that longitudinal gains in mathematics are associated with cross-grade changes in attitudes and anxiety but with several different developmental patterns for boys and girls.</p>","PeriodicalId":48459,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"115 5","pages":"767-782"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences and Similarities in Relations Between Mathematics Achievement, Attitudes, and Anxiety: A Seventh-to-Ninth Grade Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"David C Geary, Mary K Hoard, Lara Nugent, Zehra E Ünal, Nathaniel R Greene\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/edu0000793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are consistent correlations between mathematics achievement, attitudes, and anxiety, but the longitudinal relations among these constructs are not well understood nor are sex differences in these relations. To address this gap, mathematics achievement, attitudes, and anxiety were longitudinally assessed for 342 (169 boys) adolescents from 7th to 9th grade, inclusive, and Latent Growth Curve Models were used to assess the relations among these traits and developmental change in them. Spatial abilities (7th, 8th grade) and trait anxiety (8th, 9th grade) were also assessed and used for control for sex differences in these traits. Overall, boys had stronger spatial abilities and more positive mathematics attitudes and were less anxious than girls, but there were no sex differences in mathematics achievement. Across grades, mathematics achievement improved, attitudes became less positive, and anxiety increased for both boys and girls. Higher than average cross-grade growth in mathematics achievement mitigated boys' developmental declines in mathematics attitudes and increases in anxiety. Girls with strong spatial abilities had lower mathematics anxiety, but girls overall maintained higher mathematics anxiety and less positive mathematics attitudes relative to boys, even when they showed strong cross-grade gains in mathematics achievement. The study demonstrated that longitudinal gains in mathematics are associated with cross-grade changes in attitudes and anxiety but with several different developmental patterns for boys and girls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"115 5\",\"pages\":\"767-782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624155/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000793\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000793","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学成绩、态度和焦虑之间存在一致的相关性,但这些构念之间的纵向关系并没有得到很好的理解,这些关系中的性别差异也没有。为了解决这一差距,对342名(169名男孩)7-9年级青少年的数学成绩、态度和焦虑进行了纵向评估,并使用潜在生长曲线模型来评估这些特征与他们的发展变化之间的关系。空间能力(7、8年级)和特质焦虑(8、9年级)也被评估并用于控制这些特质的性别差异。总体而言,男孩的空间能力更强,数学态度更积极,焦虑程度也比女孩低,但数学成绩没有性别差异。在各个年级,男孩和女孩的数学成绩都有所提高,态度变得不那么积极,焦虑情绪也有所增加。数学成绩的跨年级增长高于平均水平,缓解了男孩数学态度的发展下降和焦虑的增加。具有较强空间能力的女孩的数学焦虑较低,但与男孩相比,女孩总体上保持着较高的数学焦虑和较不积极的数学态度,即使她们在数学成绩上表现出较强的跨年级成绩。研究表明,数学的纵向进步与态度和焦虑的跨年级变化有关,但与男孩和女孩的几种不同发展模式有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex Differences and Similarities in Relations Between Mathematics Achievement, Attitudes, and Anxiety: A Seventh-to-Ninth Grade Longitudinal Study.

There are consistent correlations between mathematics achievement, attitudes, and anxiety, but the longitudinal relations among these constructs are not well understood nor are sex differences in these relations. To address this gap, mathematics achievement, attitudes, and anxiety were longitudinally assessed for 342 (169 boys) adolescents from 7th to 9th grade, inclusive, and Latent Growth Curve Models were used to assess the relations among these traits and developmental change in them. Spatial abilities (7th, 8th grade) and trait anxiety (8th, 9th grade) were also assessed and used for control for sex differences in these traits. Overall, boys had stronger spatial abilities and more positive mathematics attitudes and were less anxious than girls, but there were no sex differences in mathematics achievement. Across grades, mathematics achievement improved, attitudes became less positive, and anxiety increased for both boys and girls. Higher than average cross-grade growth in mathematics achievement mitigated boys' developmental declines in mathematics attitudes and increases in anxiety. Girls with strong spatial abilities had lower mathematics anxiety, but girls overall maintained higher mathematics anxiety and less positive mathematics attitudes relative to boys, even when they showed strong cross-grade gains in mathematics achievement. The study demonstrated that longitudinal gains in mathematics are associated with cross-grade changes in attitudes and anxiety but with several different developmental patterns for boys and girls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Psychology
Journal of Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: The main purpose of the Journal of Educational Psychology® is to publish original, primary psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels. A secondary purpose of the Journal is the occasional publication of exceptionally important theoretical and review articles that are pertinent to educational psychology. Please note, the Journal does not typically publish reliability and validity studies of specific tests or assessment instruments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信