听觉干扰物干扰的内感受意识:难以推断身体内部状态?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Yusuke Haruki , Kenji Ogawa
{"title":"听觉干扰物干扰的内感受意识:难以推断身体内部状态?","authors":"Yusuke Haruki ,&nbsp;Kenji Ogawa","doi":"10.1016/j.neures.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent studies have associated interoceptive awareness, the perception of internal bodily sensations, with a predictive mechanism of perception across all sensory modalities. According to the framework, volitional attention plays a pivotal role in interoceptive awareness by prioritizing interoceptive sensations over exteroceptive ones. Consequently, it is hypothesized that the presence of irrelevant stimuli would disrupt the attentional modulation and interoceptive awareness, which remains untested. In this study, we investigated if interoceptive awareness is diminished by unrelated auditory distractors to validate the proposed perceptual framework. A total of 30 healthy human volunteers performed the heartbeat counting task both with and without auditory distractors. Additionally, we measured participant’s psychophysiological traits related to interoception, including the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (HF-HRV) and trait interoceptive sensibility. The results showed that interoceptive accuracy, confidence, and heartbeat intensity decreased in the presence of distractor sound. Moreover, individuals with higher HF-HRV and a greater tendency to worry about bodily states experienced a more pronounced distractor effect on interoceptive awareness. These results provide support for the perceptual mechanism of interoceptive awareness in terms of the predictive process, highlighting the impact of relative precision across interoceptive and exteroceptive signals on perceptual experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19146,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Pages 30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010223001979/pdfft?md5=4424a10c2205b5e185a9f19ffaee4e40&pid=1-s2.0-S0168010223001979-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupted interoceptive awareness by auditory distractor: Difficulty inferring the internal bodily states?\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Haruki ,&nbsp;Kenji Ogawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neures.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent studies have associated interoceptive awareness, the perception of internal bodily sensations, with a predictive mechanism of perception across all sensory modalities. According to the framework, volitional attention plays a pivotal role in interoceptive awareness by prioritizing interoceptive sensations over exteroceptive ones. Consequently, it is hypothesized that the presence of irrelevant stimuli would disrupt the attentional modulation and interoceptive awareness, which remains untested. In this study, we investigated if interoceptive awareness is diminished by unrelated auditory distractors to validate the proposed perceptual framework. A total of 30 healthy human volunteers performed the heartbeat counting task both with and without auditory distractors. Additionally, we measured participant’s psychophysiological traits related to interoception, including the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (HF-HRV) and trait interoceptive sensibility. The results showed that interoceptive accuracy, confidence, and heartbeat intensity decreased in the presence of distractor sound. Moreover, individuals with higher HF-HRV and a greater tendency to worry about bodily states experienced a more pronounced distractor effect on interoceptive awareness. These results provide support for the perceptual mechanism of interoceptive awareness in terms of the predictive process, highlighting the impact of relative precision across interoceptive and exteroceptive signals on perceptual experiences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience Research\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 30-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010223001979/pdfft?md5=4424a10c2205b5e185a9f19ffaee4e40&pid=1-s2.0-S0168010223001979-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010223001979\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010223001979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究将内感受意识(对身体内部感觉的感知)与所有感觉模式的感知预测机制联系起来。根据该框架,意志注意通过优先考虑内感受而非外感受,在内感受意识中发挥着关键作用。因此,假设不相关刺激的存在会破坏注意力调节和内感受意识,这一点尚未得到测试。在这项研究中,我们调查了不相关的听觉干扰物是否会削弱内感受意识,以验证所提出的感知框架。共有30名健康的人类志愿者在使用和不使用听觉干扰物的情况下进行了心跳计数任务。此外,我们测量了参与者与内感受相关的心理生理特征,包括心率变异性的高频成分(HF-HRV)和特征内感受敏感性。结果表明,在存在干扰音的情况下,内感受准确性、置信度和心跳强度都会降低。此外,HF-HRV较高且更倾向于担心身体状态的个体对内感受意识的干扰作用更为明显。这些结果在预测过程方面为内感知意识的感知机制提供了支持,突出了内感知和外感知信号的相对精度对感知体验的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disrupted interoceptive awareness by auditory distractor: Difficulty inferring the internal bodily states?

Recent studies have associated interoceptive awareness, the perception of internal bodily sensations, with a predictive mechanism of perception across all sensory modalities. According to the framework, volitional attention plays a pivotal role in interoceptive awareness by prioritizing interoceptive sensations over exteroceptive ones. Consequently, it is hypothesized that the presence of irrelevant stimuli would disrupt the attentional modulation and interoceptive awareness, which remains untested. In this study, we investigated if interoceptive awareness is diminished by unrelated auditory distractors to validate the proposed perceptual framework. A total of 30 healthy human volunteers performed the heartbeat counting task both with and without auditory distractors. Additionally, we measured participant’s psychophysiological traits related to interoception, including the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (HF-HRV) and trait interoceptive sensibility. The results showed that interoceptive accuracy, confidence, and heartbeat intensity decreased in the presence of distractor sound. Moreover, individuals with higher HF-HRV and a greater tendency to worry about bodily states experienced a more pronounced distractor effect on interoceptive awareness. These results provide support for the perceptual mechanism of interoceptive awareness in terms of the predictive process, highlighting the impact of relative precision across interoceptive and exteroceptive signals on perceptual experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research
Neuroscience Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The international journal publishing original full-length research articles, short communications, technical notes, and reviews on all aspects of neuroscience Neuroscience Research is an international journal for high quality articles in all branches of neuroscience, from the molecular to the behavioral levels. The journal is published in collaboration with the Japan Neuroscience Society and is open to all contributors in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信