深刻的多元文化问题。

IF 0.4 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Nieto
{"title":"深刻的多元文化问题。","authors":"S. Nieto","doi":"10.4324/9781315465692-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E ducators must ask themselves profoundly multicultural questions, that is, troubling questions about equity, access, and fair play—questions that examine the sociopolitical context of education and school policies and practices. Who is taking calculus and other academically challenging courses? Are programs for bilingual or special education students placed in the basement? Who is teaching the children—for example, why aren’t highly qualified teachers teaching children in low-income districts? How much are children worth—do we value some children over others? Until we confront these broader issues and do something about them, we will be only partially successful in educating young people for the challenging future. I still recall the question that my friend Maddie, also an educator, asked me a number of years ago when I was describing an initiative to bring a multicultural program to a particular urban school district. A supporter of multicultural education, she was nonetheless becoming frustrated by the ways in which many districts were implementing it. She was especially concerned that many students from that particular district were doing poorly in school, and she asked impatiently, “But can they do math?” Her question stayed with me for a long time—and prompted me to think about what it means to provide an education that is both multicultural and equitable (Nieto, 1999). Sadly, issues of equity and access are not always linked with multicultural education. Sometimes, multicultural education is seen as little more than a way to promote self-esteem, or simply as a curriculum that substitutes one set of heroes for another. When that happens, we may end up with young people who feel good about themselves and their heritage but who have few skills that prepare them for life; or alternatively, who know how to do math and science and read, but who know little about their cultural backgrounds and are even ashamed and embarrassed by them. Let me make clear that I strongly believe in multicultural education. That first exhilarating course that I took on the subject nearly 30 years ago put into words many of the ideas I had wanted to express since becoming a teacher. More recently, the term culturally responsive pedagogy has come into use and been advocated persuasively (Gay, 2000; Ladson-Billings, 1994). An outgrowth of multicultural education, culturally responsive pedagogy is founded on the notion that—rather than deficits—students’ backgrounds are assets that students can and should use in the service of their learning and that teachers of all backgrounds should develop the skills to teach diverse students effectively. Despite my great support for these philosophies, however, I am also concerned that they can be used in simplistic ways that fail to address the tremendous inequities that exist in our schools. For example, to adopt a multi-cultural basal Profoundly Multicultural Questions","PeriodicalId":47905,"journal":{"name":"Educational Leadership","volume":"60 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"133","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profoundly Multicultural Questions.\",\"authors\":\"S. Nieto\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315465692-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E ducators must ask themselves profoundly multicultural questions, that is, troubling questions about equity, access, and fair play—questions that examine the sociopolitical context of education and school policies and practices. Who is taking calculus and other academically challenging courses? Are programs for bilingual or special education students placed in the basement? Who is teaching the children—for example, why aren’t highly qualified teachers teaching children in low-income districts? How much are children worth—do we value some children over others? Until we confront these broader issues and do something about them, we will be only partially successful in educating young people for the challenging future. I still recall the question that my friend Maddie, also an educator, asked me a number of years ago when I was describing an initiative to bring a multicultural program to a particular urban school district. A supporter of multicultural education, she was nonetheless becoming frustrated by the ways in which many districts were implementing it. She was especially concerned that many students from that particular district were doing poorly in school, and she asked impatiently, “But can they do math?” Her question stayed with me for a long time—and prompted me to think about what it means to provide an education that is both multicultural and equitable (Nieto, 1999). Sadly, issues of equity and access are not always linked with multicultural education. Sometimes, multicultural education is seen as little more than a way to promote self-esteem, or simply as a curriculum that substitutes one set of heroes for another. When that happens, we may end up with young people who feel good about themselves and their heritage but who have few skills that prepare them for life; or alternatively, who know how to do math and science and read, but who know little about their cultural backgrounds and are even ashamed and embarrassed by them. Let me make clear that I strongly believe in multicultural education. That first exhilarating course that I took on the subject nearly 30 years ago put into words many of the ideas I had wanted to express since becoming a teacher. More recently, the term culturally responsive pedagogy has come into use and been advocated persuasively (Gay, 2000; Ladson-Billings, 1994). An outgrowth of multicultural education, culturally responsive pedagogy is founded on the notion that—rather than deficits—students’ backgrounds are assets that students can and should use in the service of their learning and that teachers of all backgrounds should develop the skills to teach diverse students effectively. Despite my great support for these philosophies, however, I am also concerned that they can be used in simplistic ways that fail to address the tremendous inequities that exist in our schools. For example, to adopt a multi-cultural basal Profoundly Multicultural Questions\",\"PeriodicalId\":47905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Leadership\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"133\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465692-11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465692-11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 133

摘要

教育工作者必须向自己提出深刻的多元文化问题,即关于公平、机会和公平竞争的令人不安的问题——这些问题审视了教育和学校政策与实践的社会政治背景。谁在学习微积分和其他具有学术挑战性的课程?为双语或特殊教育学生开设的课程是否设在地下室?谁来教孩子们?例如,为什么高素质的教师不去教低收入地区的孩子?孩子的价值是多少?我们是否重视某些孩子?在我们面对这些更广泛的问题并采取行动之前,我们在教育年轻人迎接充满挑战的未来方面只能取得部分成功。我仍然记得几年前我的朋友麦迪问我的问题,她也是一名教育家,当时我正在描述一项将多元文化项目引入某个城市学区的倡议。作为多元文化教育的支持者,她对许多地区实施多元文化教育的方式感到沮丧。她特别担心那个地区的许多学生在学校表现很差,她不耐烦地问:“但他们会做数学吗?”她的问题困扰了我很长一段时间,并促使我思考提供多元文化和公平的教育意味着什么(Nieto, 1999)。可悲的是,公平和机会问题并不总是与多元文化教育联系在一起。有时候,多元文化教育被看作是一种提升自尊的方式,或者仅仅是一种用一组英雄代替另一组英雄的课程。当这种情况发生时,我们最终可能会看到年轻人对自己和自己的传统感觉良好,但他们几乎没有为生活做好准备的技能;或者,他们知道如何做数学、科学和阅读,但他们对自己的文化背景知之甚少,甚至为此感到羞耻和尴尬。让我明确一点,我非常相信多元文化教育。大约30年前,我第一次学习这门令人振奋的课程,把我当老师以来一直想表达的许多想法用语言表达了出来。最近,“文化响应教学法”一词开始使用,并得到了有说服力的倡导(Gay, 2000;Ladson-Billings, 1994)。作为多元文化教育的产物,文化响应教学法是建立在这样一种观念之上的,即学生的背景是学生能够而且应该用来为他们的学习服务的资产,而不是缺陷,所有背景的教师都应该培养有效地教授不同学生的技能。尽管我非常支持这些哲学,但我也担心它们可能被简单化地使用,而无法解决我们学校中存在的巨大不平等。例如,采纳多元文化的基础是深刻的多元文化问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profoundly Multicultural Questions.
E ducators must ask themselves profoundly multicultural questions, that is, troubling questions about equity, access, and fair play—questions that examine the sociopolitical context of education and school policies and practices. Who is taking calculus and other academically challenging courses? Are programs for bilingual or special education students placed in the basement? Who is teaching the children—for example, why aren’t highly qualified teachers teaching children in low-income districts? How much are children worth—do we value some children over others? Until we confront these broader issues and do something about them, we will be only partially successful in educating young people for the challenging future. I still recall the question that my friend Maddie, also an educator, asked me a number of years ago when I was describing an initiative to bring a multicultural program to a particular urban school district. A supporter of multicultural education, she was nonetheless becoming frustrated by the ways in which many districts were implementing it. She was especially concerned that many students from that particular district were doing poorly in school, and she asked impatiently, “But can they do math?” Her question stayed with me for a long time—and prompted me to think about what it means to provide an education that is both multicultural and equitable (Nieto, 1999). Sadly, issues of equity and access are not always linked with multicultural education. Sometimes, multicultural education is seen as little more than a way to promote self-esteem, or simply as a curriculum that substitutes one set of heroes for another. When that happens, we may end up with young people who feel good about themselves and their heritage but who have few skills that prepare them for life; or alternatively, who know how to do math and science and read, but who know little about their cultural backgrounds and are even ashamed and embarrassed by them. Let me make clear that I strongly believe in multicultural education. That first exhilarating course that I took on the subject nearly 30 years ago put into words many of the ideas I had wanted to express since becoming a teacher. More recently, the term culturally responsive pedagogy has come into use and been advocated persuasively (Gay, 2000; Ladson-Billings, 1994). An outgrowth of multicultural education, culturally responsive pedagogy is founded on the notion that—rather than deficits—students’ backgrounds are assets that students can and should use in the service of their learning and that teachers of all backgrounds should develop the skills to teach diverse students effectively. Despite my great support for these philosophies, however, I am also concerned that they can be used in simplistic ways that fail to address the tremendous inequities that exist in our schools. For example, to adopt a multi-cultural basal Profoundly Multicultural Questions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Leadership
Educational Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: How can schools cultivate a greater sense of overall safety, in both physical and emotional terms? The October 2019 issue of Educational Leadership® (EL®) explores this pressing topic, offering ideas and strategies for ensuring that students and teachers feel protected, supported, and free to learn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信