思维工具

IF 0.4 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Burns
{"title":"思维工具","authors":"M. Burns","doi":"10.4135/9781483340333.n415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revisiting the literature from the 1990s on instructional technology is like journeying back to a more nostalgic and hopeful time when the promise of computers—and their potential impact on student learning— appeared boundless. Used in concert with a learner-centered instructional approach and a curriculum that focused on authentic learning, computers, it was thought, would serve as ―mind tools‖ (Jonassen, 1996) to build students' higher-order thinking skills. In fact, the terms computers and higher-order thinking formed a sort of double helix in instructional technology parlance. Infrastructural supports in the United States—such as E-rate and federal funding for hardware, software, and teacher training initiatives—exemplified a commitment to the belief that computers could transform student learning.","PeriodicalId":47905,"journal":{"name":"Educational Leadership","volume":"69 1","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tools for the Mind\",\"authors\":\"M. Burns\",\"doi\":\"10.4135/9781483340333.n415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Revisiting the literature from the 1990s on instructional technology is like journeying back to a more nostalgic and hopeful time when the promise of computers—and their potential impact on student learning— appeared boundless. Used in concert with a learner-centered instructional approach and a curriculum that focused on authentic learning, computers, it was thought, would serve as ―mind tools‖ (Jonassen, 1996) to build students' higher-order thinking skills. In fact, the terms computers and higher-order thinking formed a sort of double helix in instructional technology parlance. Infrastructural supports in the United States—such as E-rate and federal funding for hardware, software, and teacher training initiatives—exemplified a commitment to the belief that computers could transform student learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Leadership\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"48-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483340333.n415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483340333.n415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

回顾20世纪90年代关于教学技术的文献,就像回到一个更怀旧、更充满希望的时代,那时计算机的前景——以及它们对学生学习的潜在影响——似乎是无限的。与以学习者为中心的教学方法和注重真实学习的课程相结合,人们认为计算机将作为“思维工具”(Jonassen, 1996)来培养学生的高阶思维技能。事实上,计算机和高阶思维这两个术语在教学技术术语中形成了一种双螺旋结构。美国的基础设施支持——比如E-rate和联邦政府对硬件、软件和教师培训计划的资助——体现了对计算机可以改变学生学习的信念的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tools for the Mind
Revisiting the literature from the 1990s on instructional technology is like journeying back to a more nostalgic and hopeful time when the promise of computers—and their potential impact on student learning— appeared boundless. Used in concert with a learner-centered instructional approach and a curriculum that focused on authentic learning, computers, it was thought, would serve as ―mind tools‖ (Jonassen, 1996) to build students' higher-order thinking skills. In fact, the terms computers and higher-order thinking formed a sort of double helix in instructional technology parlance. Infrastructural supports in the United States—such as E-rate and federal funding for hardware, software, and teacher training initiatives—exemplified a commitment to the belief that computers could transform student learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Leadership
Educational Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: How can schools cultivate a greater sense of overall safety, in both physical and emotional terms? The October 2019 issue of Educational Leadership® (EL®) explores this pressing topic, offering ideas and strategies for ensuring that students and teachers feel protected, supported, and free to learn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信