两种实时荧光定量PCR方法对食品中猪肉和马DNA相对定量的验证

M. Burns, G. Nixon
{"title":"两种实时荧光定量PCR方法对食品中猪肉和马DNA相对定量的验证","authors":"M. Burns, G. Nixon","doi":"10.4236/fns.2022.134029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two real-time PCR methods for the relative quantitation of DNA from meat species in food samples are described: these methods are applicable for horse in processed beef meat products, and pork in raw/processed beef meat products. Test samples were prepared using raw meat admixtures or processed horse/pork in beef food products made to an industry-standard recipe. The methods were subjected to single laboratory method validation, evaluating the performance characteristics of specificity, PCR efficiency and r-squared (r 2 ), Limit of Detection (LOD), Limit of Quantitation (LOQ), and precision and trueness. A limited UK-based inter-laboratory trial of the two methods was completed involving four participating laboratories. Full statistical analysis of the data qualified the applicability of the methods for accurate and sen-sitive trace-level analysis. The methods were deemed fit for purpose for re-producibly distinguishing between adventitious contamination at 0.1% (w/w), the level for further enforcement action at 1% (w/w), and a level representative of deliberate economically motivated adulteration (10% (w/w)). The data provided evidence that the precision of the two methods was applicable for qualitative and quantitative detection at topically important levels of adulteration. This work has added significant value to the current state of the art in quantitative determination of topical meat species adulteration, allowing analysts to distinguish between adventitious contamination and deliberate adulteration. The resulting methods described in this paper can easily be deployed and used by analytical laboratories for controls and due-diligence testing based on standard laboratory equipment.","PeriodicalId":69581,"journal":{"name":"食品与营养科学(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Two Real-Time PCR Approaches for the Relative Quantitation of Pork and Horse DNA in Food Samples\",\"authors\":\"M. Burns, G. Nixon\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/fns.2022.134029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two real-time PCR methods for the relative quantitation of DNA from meat species in food samples are described: these methods are applicable for horse in processed beef meat products, and pork in raw/processed beef meat products. Test samples were prepared using raw meat admixtures or processed horse/pork in beef food products made to an industry-standard recipe. The methods were subjected to single laboratory method validation, evaluating the performance characteristics of specificity, PCR efficiency and r-squared (r 2 ), Limit of Detection (LOD), Limit of Quantitation (LOQ), and precision and trueness. A limited UK-based inter-laboratory trial of the two methods was completed involving four participating laboratories. Full statistical analysis of the data qualified the applicability of the methods for accurate and sen-sitive trace-level analysis. The methods were deemed fit for purpose for re-producibly distinguishing between adventitious contamination at 0.1% (w/w), the level for further enforcement action at 1% (w/w), and a level representative of deliberate economically motivated adulteration (10% (w/w)). The data provided evidence that the precision of the two methods was applicable for qualitative and quantitative detection at topically important levels of adulteration. This work has added significant value to the current state of the art in quantitative determination of topical meat species adulteration, allowing analysts to distinguish between adventitious contamination and deliberate adulteration. The resulting methods described in this paper can easily be deployed and used by analytical laboratories for controls and due-diligence testing based on standard laboratory equipment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":69581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"食品与营养科学(英文)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"食品与营养科学(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2022.134029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"食品与营养科学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2022.134029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍了两种食品样品中肉类物种DNA相对定量的实时PCR方法:这些方法适用于加工牛肉肉制品中的马和生/加工牛肉肉制品中的猪肉。测试样品是用生肉外加剂或加工过的马/猪肉制成的牛肉食品按照行业标准配方制备的。对方法进行单实验室验证,评估特异性、PCR效率和r²(r 2)、检出限(LOD)、定量限(LOQ)、精密度和真实度等性能特征。在英国完成了对这两种方法的有限的实验室间试验,涉及四个参与的实验室。对数据进行充分的统计分析,证明该方法适用于准确和灵敏的痕量水平分析。这些方法被认为适合于可重复区分0.1% (w/w)的意外污染、1% (w/w)的进一步执法行动水平和10% (w/w)的故意经济动机掺假水平。数据提供的证据表明,这两种方法的精度是适用于定性和定量检测在主题重要水平的掺假。这项工作增加了显著的价值,以定量确定局部肉类物种掺假的艺术的当前状态,允许分析人员区分外来污染和故意掺假。本文中描述的结果方法可以很容易地被分析实验室用于基于标准实验室设备的控制和尽职调查测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Two Real-Time PCR Approaches for the Relative Quantitation of Pork and Horse DNA in Food Samples
Two real-time PCR methods for the relative quantitation of DNA from meat species in food samples are described: these methods are applicable for horse in processed beef meat products, and pork in raw/processed beef meat products. Test samples were prepared using raw meat admixtures or processed horse/pork in beef food products made to an industry-standard recipe. The methods were subjected to single laboratory method validation, evaluating the performance characteristics of specificity, PCR efficiency and r-squared (r 2 ), Limit of Detection (LOD), Limit of Quantitation (LOQ), and precision and trueness. A limited UK-based inter-laboratory trial of the two methods was completed involving four participating laboratories. Full statistical analysis of the data qualified the applicability of the methods for accurate and sen-sitive trace-level analysis. The methods were deemed fit for purpose for re-producibly distinguishing between adventitious contamination at 0.1% (w/w), the level for further enforcement action at 1% (w/w), and a level representative of deliberate economically motivated adulteration (10% (w/w)). The data provided evidence that the precision of the two methods was applicable for qualitative and quantitative detection at topically important levels of adulteration. This work has added significant value to the current state of the art in quantitative determination of topical meat species adulteration, allowing analysts to distinguish between adventitious contamination and deliberate adulteration. The resulting methods described in this paper can easily be deployed and used by analytical laboratories for controls and due-diligence testing based on standard laboratory equipment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1453
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信