病人什么时候应该为小病寻求医疗护理:一年级和最后一年级药学学生的观点

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jeff G. Taylor, Nardine Nakhla, Trudi J Aspden, P. Rutter, Jenny A. Van Amburgh
{"title":"病人什么时候应该为小病寻求医疗护理:一年级和最后一年级药学学生的观点","authors":"Jeff G. Taylor, Nardine Nakhla, Trudi J Aspden, P. Rutter, Jenny A. Van Amburgh","doi":"10.46542/pe.2023.231.479490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Universities are tasked with preparing students to assist the public in managing minor ailments. This study aimed to determine when pharmacy students would refer patients to medical care as an indicator of clinical skill. \nMethods: First- and final-year students from four schools were surveyed to determine referral timelines for 17 scenarios. Responders also quantified symptom severity and their confidence levels.\nResults: Students responding to at least three cases were kept for analysis (n = 117). First-year students considered nasal congestion to be low in severity, with painful urination and rectal bleeding deemed more serious, all while considering most cases more serious than upper-year students. Student confidence was generally lower in new students. Referral times showed similar patterns between years and universities. Red eye, painful urination, diarrhoea (child), and Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) (unhealthy patient) were referred quicker than nasal allergies and cough. Referrals typically stayed within a two-week window for most situations.\nConclusion: Timelines for medical care were similar between years and institutions. As expected, new students assessed cases as more serious and had less confidence than their upper-year colleagues. A concern for the institutions might be the low rate of real-world case exposure within programmes.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When patients should seek medical care for minor ailments: Perspectives of first- and final-year pharmacy students\",\"authors\":\"Jeff G. Taylor, Nardine Nakhla, Trudi J Aspden, P. Rutter, Jenny A. Van Amburgh\",\"doi\":\"10.46542/pe.2023.231.479490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Universities are tasked with preparing students to assist the public in managing minor ailments. This study aimed to determine when pharmacy students would refer patients to medical care as an indicator of clinical skill. \\nMethods: First- and final-year students from four schools were surveyed to determine referral timelines for 17 scenarios. Responders also quantified symptom severity and their confidence levels.\\nResults: Students responding to at least three cases were kept for analysis (n = 117). First-year students considered nasal congestion to be low in severity, with painful urination and rectal bleeding deemed more serious, all while considering most cases more serious than upper-year students. Student confidence was generally lower in new students. Referral times showed similar patterns between years and universities. Red eye, painful urination, diarrhoea (child), and Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) (unhealthy patient) were referred quicker than nasal allergies and cough. Referrals typically stayed within a two-week window for most situations.\\nConclusion: Timelines for medical care were similar between years and institutions. As expected, new students assessed cases as more serious and had less confidence than their upper-year colleagues. A concern for the institutions might be the low rate of real-world case exposure within programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.479490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.479490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大学的任务是培养学生协助公众处理小病。本研究旨在探讨药剂学学生是否会将病人转诊至医疗服务,以作为其临床技能的一项指标。方法:对来自四所学校的一年级和大四学生进行调查,以确定17种情况的转诊时间表。应答者还量化了症状的严重程度和他们的信心水平。结果:对至少三个病例有反应的学生被留作分析(n = 117)。一年级学生认为鼻塞的严重程度较低,排尿疼痛和直肠出血被认为更严重,但大多数情况下比高年级学生更严重。新生的自信心普遍较低。转诊时间在不同年份和不同大学之间显示出相似的模式。红眼、尿痛、腹泻(儿童)和胃食管反流病(GORD)(不健康患者)比鼻过敏和咳嗽更快被转诊。在大多数情况下,转诊通常在两周内完成。结论:不同年份、不同机构的患者就诊时间相似。不出所料,与高年级同学相比,新生对案件的评估更严重,信心也更弱。各机构关注的一个问题可能是规划内实际病例接触率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When patients should seek medical care for minor ailments: Perspectives of first- and final-year pharmacy students
Background: Universities are tasked with preparing students to assist the public in managing minor ailments. This study aimed to determine when pharmacy students would refer patients to medical care as an indicator of clinical skill.  Methods: First- and final-year students from four schools were surveyed to determine referral timelines for 17 scenarios. Responders also quantified symptom severity and their confidence levels. Results: Students responding to at least three cases were kept for analysis (n = 117). First-year students considered nasal congestion to be low in severity, with painful urination and rectal bleeding deemed more serious, all while considering most cases more serious than upper-year students. Student confidence was generally lower in new students. Referral times showed similar patterns between years and universities. Red eye, painful urination, diarrhoea (child), and Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) (unhealthy patient) were referred quicker than nasal allergies and cough. Referrals typically stayed within a two-week window for most situations. Conclusion: Timelines for medical care were similar between years and institutions. As expected, new students assessed cases as more serious and had less confidence than their upper-year colleagues. A concern for the institutions might be the low rate of real-world case exposure within programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信