非偏见动机的变化反映了美国社会政治气候的变化

IF 4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Douglas L. Kievit, J. LaCosse, Stephanie R. Mallinas, David S. March, J. Kunstman, Kevin L. Zabel, M. Olson, E. Plant
{"title":"非偏见动机的变化反映了美国社会政治气候的变化","authors":"Douglas L. Kievit, J. LaCosse, Stephanie R. Mallinas, David S. March, J. Kunstman, Kevin L. Zabel, M. Olson, E. Plant","doi":"10.1177/13684302221089768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset (N = 13,395), we track movement in internal and external motivations to respond without prejudice from 2004 to 2017. Internal motivation initially decreased before ticking upward following multiple events suggesting worsening race relations (e.g., noteworthy killings of unarmed Black men, resurgent racialized politics). Conversely, external motivation initially increased but reversed course across the same time span. A second dataset (N = 2,503) corroborates these trends in two conceptually related nonprejudiced motivations. Results suggest that changes in nonprejudiced motivations may reflect broader shifts in the sociopolitical climate.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"26 1","pages":"934 - 952"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in nonprejudiced motivations track shifts in the U.S. sociopolitical climate\",\"authors\":\"Douglas L. Kievit, J. LaCosse, Stephanie R. Mallinas, David S. March, J. Kunstman, Kevin L. Zabel, M. Olson, E. Plant\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13684302221089768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset (N = 13,395), we track movement in internal and external motivations to respond without prejudice from 2004 to 2017. Internal motivation initially decreased before ticking upward following multiple events suggesting worsening race relations (e.g., noteworthy killings of unarmed Black men, resurgent racialized politics). Conversely, external motivation initially increased but reversed course across the same time span. A second dataset (N = 2,503) corroborates these trends in two conceptually related nonprejudiced motivations. Results suggest that changes in nonprejudiced motivations may reflect broader shifts in the sociopolitical climate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"934 - 952\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221089768\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221089768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近,重大社会事件影响了美国对种族关系的看法。目前的研究认为,随着这些更广泛的社会力量的变化,人们对黑人不存在偏见的动机也发生了变化。对两个独立档案数据集的分析表明,在过去15年中,非偏见动机随着社会环境的变化而发生了可预测的变化。在一个数据集(N = 13,395)中,我们跟踪了2004年至2017年内部和外部动机的变化,以不带偏见地做出回应。内部动机最初是下降的,但在一系列表明种族关系恶化的事件(例如,值得注意的手无寸铁的黑人被杀事件,种族化政治的复苏)之后才上升。相反,外部动机最初是增加的,但在相同的时间跨度内却发生了逆转。第二个数据集(N = 2503)在两个概念上相关的无偏见动机中证实了这些趋势。结果表明,非偏见动机的变化可能反映了社会政治气候的更广泛变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in nonprejudiced motivations track shifts in the U.S. sociopolitical climate
Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset (N = 13,395), we track movement in internal and external motivations to respond without prejudice from 2004 to 2017. Internal motivation initially decreased before ticking upward following multiple events suggesting worsening race relations (e.g., noteworthy killings of unarmed Black men, resurgent racialized politics). Conversely, external motivation initially increased but reversed course across the same time span. A second dataset (N = 2,503) corroborates these trends in two conceptually related nonprejudiced motivations. Results suggest that changes in nonprejudiced motivations may reflect broader shifts in the sociopolitical climate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations is a scientific social psychology journal dedicated to research on social psychological processes within and between groups. It provides a forum for and is aimed at researchers and students in social psychology and related disciples (e.g., organizational and management sciences, political science, sociology, language and communication, cross cultural psychology, international relations) that have a scientific interest in the social psychology of human groups. The journal has an extensive editorial team that includes many if not most of the leading scholars in social psychology of group processes and intergroup relations from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信