{"title":"两种屠宰条件下猪场水补镁对猪肉品质的影响","authors":"E. VAN HEUGTEN, D. HANSON, D. ANGE III, M.T. SEE","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00187.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p> <i>The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pre-harvest Mg supplementation and stunning method on longissimus (LM) and semitendinosus (SM) pork muscle quality. Magnesium was supplemented for 2 days in drinking water (300 ppm) before pigs were harvested at a commercial packing plant using either electrical or CO<sub>2</sub> stunning. Magnesium supplementation did not affect (</i>P > <i>0.10) ultimate pH, initial fluid loss, retail display purge loss or color of the LM and SM. Pork quality was generally improved in LM and SM samples obtained from the plant using CO<sub>2</sub> stunning as evidenced by reduced initial fluid loss (</i>P < <i>0.001), reduced purge loss (</i>P < <i>0.05) and lower </i>L<i>* (darker), </i>a<i>* (less red) and </i>b<i>* (less yellow) values (</i>P < <i>0.05) during an 8-day retail display. Pork quality was improved when using CO<sub>2</sub> stunning technology; however, Mg supplementation did not improve pork quality in either plant.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\n \n <p>Pork quality is one of the main issues for the pork industry to consider in order to remain competitive in a global market. We evaluated the supplementation of Mg through the water in collaboration with a swine production company and two large commercial packing plants. Clear differences in pork quality were evident, with the packing plant using CO<sub>2</sub> stunning having superior pork quality compared with the plant using electrical stunning. Supplementation of Mg through water can be applied on the farm immediately at a very low cost, but was not effective in improving pork quality in two commercial packing plants under practical conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muscle Foods","volume":"21 2","pages":"350-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00187.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTS OF ON-FARM MAGNESIUM SUPPLEMENTATION THROUGH WATER ON PORK QUALITY UNDER TWO SLAUGHTER CONDITIONS\",\"authors\":\"E. VAN HEUGTEN, D. HANSON, D. ANGE III, M.T. SEE\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00187.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\\n \\n <p> <i>The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pre-harvest Mg supplementation and stunning method on longissimus (LM) and semitendinosus (SM) pork muscle quality. Magnesium was supplemented for 2 days in drinking water (300 ppm) before pigs were harvested at a commercial packing plant using either electrical or CO<sub>2</sub> stunning. Magnesium supplementation did not affect (</i>P > <i>0.10) ultimate pH, initial fluid loss, retail display purge loss or color of the LM and SM. Pork quality was generally improved in LM and SM samples obtained from the plant using CO<sub>2</sub> stunning as evidenced by reduced initial fluid loss (</i>P < <i>0.001), reduced purge loss (</i>P < <i>0.05) and lower </i>L<i>* (darker), </i>a<i>* (less red) and </i>b<i>* (less yellow) values (</i>P < <i>0.05) during an 8-day retail display. Pork quality was improved when using CO<sub>2</sub> stunning technology; however, Mg supplementation did not improve pork quality in either plant.</i></p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pork quality is one of the main issues for the pork industry to consider in order to remain competitive in a global market. We evaluated the supplementation of Mg through the water in collaboration with a swine production company and two large commercial packing plants. Clear differences in pork quality were evident, with the packing plant using CO<sub>2</sub> stunning having superior pork quality compared with the plant using electrical stunning. Supplementation of Mg through water can be applied on the farm immediately at a very low cost, but was not effective in improving pork quality in two commercial packing plants under practical conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Muscle Foods\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"350-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00187.x\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Muscle Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00187.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muscle Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00187.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
EFFECTS OF ON-FARM MAGNESIUM SUPPLEMENTATION THROUGH WATER ON PORK QUALITY UNDER TWO SLAUGHTER CONDITIONS
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pre-harvest Mg supplementation and stunning method on longissimus (LM) and semitendinosus (SM) pork muscle quality. Magnesium was supplemented for 2 days in drinking water (300 ppm) before pigs were harvested at a commercial packing plant using either electrical or CO2 stunning. Magnesium supplementation did not affect (P > 0.10) ultimate pH, initial fluid loss, retail display purge loss or color of the LM and SM. Pork quality was generally improved in LM and SM samples obtained from the plant using CO2 stunning as evidenced by reduced initial fluid loss (P < 0.001), reduced purge loss (P < 0.05) and lower L* (darker), a* (less red) and b* (less yellow) values (P < 0.05) during an 8-day retail display. Pork quality was improved when using CO2 stunning technology; however, Mg supplementation did not improve pork quality in either plant.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
Pork quality is one of the main issues for the pork industry to consider in order to remain competitive in a global market. We evaluated the supplementation of Mg through the water in collaboration with a swine production company and two large commercial packing plants. Clear differences in pork quality were evident, with the packing plant using CO2 stunning having superior pork quality compared with the plant using electrical stunning. Supplementation of Mg through water can be applied on the farm immediately at a very low cost, but was not effective in improving pork quality in two commercial packing plants under practical conditions.