{"title":"高等教育中学生体验与归属感的当代动态","authors":"R. Raaper","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2021.1983852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education has changed rapidly over the past few decades where market forces and global competition have become defining characteristics of university sectors worldwide. Alongside the intensification of marketisation, the meanings around what it is to be a university student has also undergone change. In 2015, Critical Studies in Education published an article entitled ‘The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good’ by Rajani Naidoo and Joanna Williams that placed the English university students within the rapidly shifting neoliberalised higher education context and encouraged important debate in the field. This paper has now been cited over 200 times, reflecting its significant contribution to our scholarly understandings of the consumerist policy construction of university students. The authors skilfully demonstrate how the policy discourses in England produce and portray the student as a fee-paying consumer and further marginalise students with lower economic and cultural capital. Further, Naidoo and Williams (2015, p. 219) caution us that","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary dynamics of student experience and belonging in higher education\",\"authors\":\"R. Raaper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508487.2021.1983852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Higher education has changed rapidly over the past few decades where market forces and global competition have become defining characteristics of university sectors worldwide. Alongside the intensification of marketisation, the meanings around what it is to be a university student has also undergone change. In 2015, Critical Studies in Education published an article entitled ‘The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good’ by Rajani Naidoo and Joanna Williams that placed the English university students within the rapidly shifting neoliberalised higher education context and encouraged important debate in the field. This paper has now been cited over 200 times, reflecting its significant contribution to our scholarly understandings of the consumerist policy construction of university students. The authors skilfully demonstrate how the policy discourses in England produce and portray the student as a fee-paying consumer and further marginalise students with lower economic and cultural capital. Further, Naidoo and Williams (2015, p. 219) caution us that\",\"PeriodicalId\":47434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Studies in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2021.1983852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2021.1983852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
在过去的几十年里,高等教育发生了迅速的变化,市场力量和全球竞争已经成为世界各地大学部门的决定性特征。随着市场化的加剧,大学生的意义也发生了变化。2015年,《教育批判研究》发表了一篇题为《英国高等教育中的新自由主义制度:宪章、消费者和公共利益的侵蚀》的文章,作者是Rajani Naidoo和Joanna Williams,该文将英国大学生置于快速变化的新自由主义高等教育背景中,并鼓励了该领域的重要辩论。这篇论文被引用超过200次,对我们对大学生消费主义政策建构的学术理解做出了重要贡献。作者巧妙地展示了英国的政策话语如何将学生塑造成付费消费者,并进一步边缘化经济和文化资本较低的学生。此外,Naidoo和Williams (2015, p. 219)警告我们
Contemporary dynamics of student experience and belonging in higher education
Higher education has changed rapidly over the past few decades where market forces and global competition have become defining characteristics of university sectors worldwide. Alongside the intensification of marketisation, the meanings around what it is to be a university student has also undergone change. In 2015, Critical Studies in Education published an article entitled ‘The neoliberal regime in English higher education: charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good’ by Rajani Naidoo and Joanna Williams that placed the English university students within the rapidly shifting neoliberalised higher education context and encouraged important debate in the field. This paper has now been cited over 200 times, reflecting its significant contribution to our scholarly understandings of the consumerist policy construction of university students. The authors skilfully demonstrate how the policy discourses in England produce and portray the student as a fee-paying consumer and further marginalise students with lower economic and cultural capital. Further, Naidoo and Williams (2015, p. 219) caution us that
期刊介绍:
Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.