土耳其对教育学习资本问卷的改编:资优与非资优学生的结果

Q3 Social Sciences
Marilena Z. Leana-Taşcılar
{"title":"土耳其对教育学习资本问卷的改编:资优与非资优学生的结果","authors":"Marilena Z. Leana-Taşcılar","doi":"10.1080/15332276.2016.1305863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Actiotope Model of Giftedness (AMG) focuses on person–environment interactions to define giftedness. The development of the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) was based on the AMG. The first aim of this study was to present the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the QELC for 10th grade students. The second aim of this study was the administration of the QELC in gifted and non-gifted students and the determination of mean QELC-scale differences between both groups. Two different samples were included in the study. In the first sample, 421 10th grade students took the QELC (147 boys, 274 girls). The second sample consisted of 38 gifted students and 38 non-gifted students, the latter randomly selected from the first sample. In addition to the QELC, confidence in one’s competence, failure coping, stability and modifiability beliefs regarding one’s action repertoire were assessed and used to validate the QELC. School grades were collected, too. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the QELC (i.e., educational capital and learning capital). The results supported the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of QELC. Gifted students had lower scores in educational as well as learning capital than non-gifted students.","PeriodicalId":52310,"journal":{"name":"Gifted and Talented International","volume":"31 1","pages":"102 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2016.1305863","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turkish adaptation of the educational-learning capital questionnaire: Results for gifted and non-gifted students\",\"authors\":\"Marilena Z. Leana-Taşcılar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15332276.2016.1305863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Actiotope Model of Giftedness (AMG) focuses on person–environment interactions to define giftedness. The development of the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) was based on the AMG. The first aim of this study was to present the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the QELC for 10th grade students. The second aim of this study was the administration of the QELC in gifted and non-gifted students and the determination of mean QELC-scale differences between both groups. Two different samples were included in the study. In the first sample, 421 10th grade students took the QELC (147 boys, 274 girls). The second sample consisted of 38 gifted students and 38 non-gifted students, the latter randomly selected from the first sample. In addition to the QELC, confidence in one’s competence, failure coping, stability and modifiability beliefs regarding one’s action repertoire were assessed and used to validate the QELC. School grades were collected, too. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the QELC (i.e., educational capital and learning capital). The results supported the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of QELC. Gifted students had lower scores in educational as well as learning capital than non-gifted students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted and Talented International\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2016.1305863\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted and Talented International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2016.1305863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted and Talented International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2016.1305863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

资优行为模式(AMG)侧重于人与环境的相互作用来定义资优。教育与学习资本调查问卷(QELC)的开发是基于AMG。本研究的第一个目的是为10年级学生提供土耳其语版QELC的信度和效度。本研究的第二个目的是对资优学生和非资优学生的QELC进行管理,并确定两组之间的平均QELC量表差异。研究中包括了两个不同的样本。在第一个样本中,421名10年级学生参加了QELC(147名男生,274名女生)。第二个样本由38名资优学生和38名非资优学生组成,后者是从第一个样本中随机抽取的。除QELC外,还评估了对个人能力的信心、应对失败的能力、稳定性和可修改性信念,并用于验证QELC。学校成绩也被收集起来。验证性因子分析的结果支持QELC的双因子结构(即教育资本和学习资本)。结果支持土耳其语版质量质量标准的效度和信度。资优学生在教育资本和学习资本方面的得分低于非资优学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turkish adaptation of the educational-learning capital questionnaire: Results for gifted and non-gifted students
ABSTRACT The Actiotope Model of Giftedness (AMG) focuses on person–environment interactions to define giftedness. The development of the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) was based on the AMG. The first aim of this study was to present the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the QELC for 10th grade students. The second aim of this study was the administration of the QELC in gifted and non-gifted students and the determination of mean QELC-scale differences between both groups. Two different samples were included in the study. In the first sample, 421 10th grade students took the QELC (147 boys, 274 girls). The second sample consisted of 38 gifted students and 38 non-gifted students, the latter randomly selected from the first sample. In addition to the QELC, confidence in one’s competence, failure coping, stability and modifiability beliefs regarding one’s action repertoire were assessed and used to validate the QELC. School grades were collected, too. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the QELC (i.e., educational capital and learning capital). The results supported the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of QELC. Gifted students had lower scores in educational as well as learning capital than non-gifted students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gifted and Talented International
Gifted and Talented International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信