每个孩子，每一天

IF 0.4 4区教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Leadership Pub Date : 2012-03-01 DOI:10.1037/e526182010-001

R. Allington, Rachael E. Gabriel

{"title":"每个孩子，每一天","authors":"R. Allington, Rachael E. Gabriel","doi":"10.1037/e526182010-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research base on student-selected reading is robust and conclusive: Students read more, understand more, and are more likely to continue reading when they have the opportunity to choose what they read. In a 2004 meta-analysis, Guthrie and Humenick found that the two most powerful instructional design factors for improving reading motivation and comprehension were (1) student access to many books and (2) personal choice of what to read.","PeriodicalId":47905,"journal":{"name":"Educational Leadership","volume":"69 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Every Child, Every Day\",\"authors\":\"R. Allington, Rachael E. Gabriel\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e526182010-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research base on student-selected reading is robust and conclusive: Students read more, understand more, and are more likely to continue reading when they have the opportunity to choose what they read. In a 2004 meta-analysis, Guthrie and Humenick found that the two most powerful instructional design factors for improving reading motivation and comprehension were (1) student access to many books and (2) personal choice of what to read.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Leadership\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"78\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e526182010-001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e526182010-001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 78

摘要

基于学生选择阅读的研究是可靠和结论性的:当学生有机会选择阅读时，他们读得更多，理解得更多，更有可能继续阅读。在2004年的一项荟萃分析中，Guthrie和Humenick发现，提高阅读动机和理解能力的两个最强大的教学设计因素是(1)学生接触大量书籍和(2)阅读内容的个人选择。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Every Child, Every Day

The research base on student-selected reading is robust and conclusive: Students read more, understand more, and are more likely to continue reading when they have the opportunity to choose what they read. In a 2004 meta-analysis, Guthrie and Humenick found that the two most powerful instructional design factors for improving reading motivation and comprehension were (1) student access to many books and (2) personal choice of what to read.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Educational Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： How can schools cultivate a greater sense of overall safety, in both physical and emotional terms? The October 2019 issue of Educational Leadership® (EL®) explores this pressing topic, offering ideas and strategies for ensuring that students and teachers feel protected, supported, and free to learn.