通过合作促进行为分析各子领域之间的相互关系。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-07-26 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x
Mirari Elcoro, James W Diller, Juan C Correa
{"title":"通过合作促进行为分析各子领域之间的相互关系。","authors":"Mirari Elcoro, James W Diller, Juan C Correa","doi":"10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several barriers may inhibit the growth of behavior analysis as a more integrated and collaborative field. Two such barriers are siloed environments that reinforce a basic-applied distinction, and a lack of translational research pathways. We describe the perils of silos, and elaborate on potential solutions to increase reciprocal relations among subfields in behavior analysis. We promote a five-tiered system to classify research in behavior analysis, and discuss literature on cultivating effective intra and cross-disciplinary collaborations, including using the framework of metacontingencies to understand collaborations. We also propose quantitative and qualitative measures to examine whether the potential solutions increase intra and interdisciplinary interactions. These measures include bibliometric (e.g., citations across fields), sociometric (e.g., social network analysis), and narrative analysis. We apply some of these measures to publications from 2011-2022 from the <i>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</i> and <i>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis</i>, and argue that behavior analysis overall may benefit from a more collaborative approach.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10733255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Reciprocal Relations across Subfields of Behavior Analysis via Collaborations.\",\"authors\":\"Mirari Elcoro, James W Diller, Juan C Correa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several barriers may inhibit the growth of behavior analysis as a more integrated and collaborative field. Two such barriers are siloed environments that reinforce a basic-applied distinction, and a lack of translational research pathways. We describe the perils of silos, and elaborate on potential solutions to increase reciprocal relations among subfields in behavior analysis. We promote a five-tiered system to classify research in behavior analysis, and discuss literature on cultivating effective intra and cross-disciplinary collaborations, including using the framework of metacontingencies to understand collaborations. We also propose quantitative and qualitative measures to examine whether the potential solutions increase intra and interdisciplinary interactions. These measures include bibliometric (e.g., citations across fields), sociometric (e.g., social network analysis), and narrative analysis. We apply some of these measures to publications from 2011-2022 from the <i>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</i> and <i>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis</i>, and argue that behavior analysis overall may benefit from a more collaborative approach.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10733255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为分析作为一个更具综合性和协作性的领域,其发展可能会受到一些障碍的阻碍。其中两个障碍是强化基础与应用区别的孤岛式环境,以及缺乏转化研究途径。我们描述了 "孤岛 "的危害,并阐述了潜在的解决方案,以增强行为分析各子领域之间的互惠关系。我们提倡采用五级系统对行为分析研究进行分类,并讨论了有关培养有效的学科内和跨学科合作的文献,包括使用元关联框架来理解合作。我们还提出了定量和定性措施,以检验潜在的解决方案是否能增加学科内和跨学科互动。这些措施包括文献计量(如跨领域引用)、社会计量(如社会网络分析)和叙事分析。我们将其中一些测量方法应用于《行为实验分析期刊》和《应用行为分析期刊》2011-2022 年期间的出版物,并认为行为分析整体上可能会受益于更多的合作方法:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting Reciprocal Relations across Subfields of Behavior Analysis via Collaborations.

Several barriers may inhibit the growth of behavior analysis as a more integrated and collaborative field. Two such barriers are siloed environments that reinforce a basic-applied distinction, and a lack of translational research pathways. We describe the perils of silos, and elaborate on potential solutions to increase reciprocal relations among subfields in behavior analysis. We promote a five-tiered system to classify research in behavior analysis, and discuss literature on cultivating effective intra and cross-disciplinary collaborations, including using the framework of metacontingencies to understand collaborations. We also propose quantitative and qualitative measures to examine whether the potential solutions increase intra and interdisciplinary interactions. These measures include bibliometric (e.g., citations across fields), sociometric (e.g., social network analysis), and narrative analysis. We apply some of these measures to publications from 2011-2022 from the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior and Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, and argue that behavior analysis overall may benefit from a more collaborative approach.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信