环境、社会和治理(ESG)指标不为服务客户服务:可持续性指标与客户对社会创新的看法之间缺失了一个环节

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Lerzan Aksoy, Alexander John Buoye, Maja Fors, Timothy Lee Keiningham, Sara Rosengren
{"title":"环境、社会和治理(ESG)指标不为服务客户服务:可持续性指标与客户对社会创新的看法之间缺失了一个环节","authors":"Lerzan Aksoy, Alexander John Buoye, Maja Fors, Timothy Lee Keiningham, Sara Rosengren","doi":"10.1108/josm-11-2021-0428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to highlight challenges for service firms communicating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) efforts to customers. Specifically, it focuses on the relationship between ESG metrics and reporting and customer perceptions of social innovativeness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The empirical material comprises three years of data (2018–2020) covering more than 100 firms from three sources: (1) Social Innovation Index (Sii), which is collected as part of the American Innovation Index (Aii), (2) Bloomberg Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) ESG and (3) Datamaran.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>ESG metrics and reporting do not suffice to explain customer perceptions of social innovativeness. Rather, a firm's industry plays the prominent role in affecting these perceptions where service firms are at a disadvantage as customers perceive services as less socially innovative compared to goods.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>While ESG metrics and reporting provide important information for investors and regulators, they are not reflected in customers' perceptions of firms' social innovativeness, and services are at a disadvantage relative to goods. Therefore, services researchers and managers must advance their knowledge regarding how to better link ESG metrics and report to customers' perceptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper offers a first large-scale, cross-industry investigation of how ESG metrics and reporting impact customer perceptions of social innovativeness, leading to a research agenda on communication of ESG.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":"42 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) metrics do not serve services customers: a missing link between sustainability metrics and customer perceptions of social innovation\",\"authors\":\"Lerzan Aksoy, Alexander John Buoye, Maja Fors, Timothy Lee Keiningham, Sara Rosengren\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/josm-11-2021-0428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to highlight challenges for service firms communicating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) efforts to customers. Specifically, it focuses on the relationship between ESG metrics and reporting and customer perceptions of social innovativeness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The empirical material comprises three years of data (2018–2020) covering more than 100 firms from three sources: (1) Social Innovation Index (Sii), which is collected as part of the American Innovation Index (Aii), (2) Bloomberg Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) ESG and (3) Datamaran.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>ESG metrics and reporting do not suffice to explain customer perceptions of social innovativeness. Rather, a firm's industry plays the prominent role in affecting these perceptions where service firms are at a disadvantage as customers perceive services as less socially innovative compared to goods.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>While ESG metrics and reporting provide important information for investors and regulators, they are not reflected in customers' perceptions of firms' social innovativeness, and services are at a disadvantage relative to goods. Therefore, services researchers and managers must advance their knowledge regarding how to better link ESG metrics and report to customers' perceptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The paper offers a first large-scale, cross-industry investigation of how ESG metrics and reporting impact customer perceptions of social innovativeness, leading to a research agenda on communication of ESG.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Service Management\",\"volume\":\"42 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Service Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2021-0428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2021-0428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文的目的是强调服务公司向客户传达环境、社会和治理(ESG)努力所面临的挑战。具体而言,它侧重于ESG指标和报告与客户对社会创新的看法之间的关系。设计/方法/方法实证材料包括三年(2018-2020)的数据,涵盖100多家公司,来自三个来源:(1)社会创新指数(Sii),作为美国创新指数(Aii)的一部分收集,(2)彭博可持续会计准则委员会(SASB) ESG和(3)Datamaran。研究发现,sesg指标和报告不足以解释客户对社会创新的看法。相反,一个公司的行业在影响这些观念方面发挥着突出作用,服务公司处于不利地位,因为客户认为服务与商品相比缺乏社会创新。虽然ESG指标和报告为投资者和监管机构提供了重要信息,但它们并没有反映在客户对公司社会创新的看法中,而且服务相对于商品处于劣势。因此,服务研究人员和管理者必须提高他们的知识,了解如何更好地将ESG指标和报告与客户的看法联系起来。原创性/价值本文首次对ESG指标和报告如何影响客户对社会创新的看法进行了大规模的跨行业调查,从而提出了ESG传播的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) metrics do not serve services customers: a missing link between sustainability metrics and customer perceptions of social innovation

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to highlight challenges for service firms communicating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) efforts to customers. Specifically, it focuses on the relationship between ESG metrics and reporting and customer perceptions of social innovativeness.

Design/methodology/approach

The empirical material comprises three years of data (2018–2020) covering more than 100 firms from three sources: (1) Social Innovation Index (Sii), which is collected as part of the American Innovation Index (Aii), (2) Bloomberg Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) ESG and (3) Datamaran.

Findings

ESG metrics and reporting do not suffice to explain customer perceptions of social innovativeness. Rather, a firm's industry plays the prominent role in affecting these perceptions where service firms are at a disadvantage as customers perceive services as less socially innovative compared to goods.

Practical implications

While ESG metrics and reporting provide important information for investors and regulators, they are not reflected in customers' perceptions of firms' social innovativeness, and services are at a disadvantage relative to goods. Therefore, services researchers and managers must advance their knowledge regarding how to better link ESG metrics and report to customers' perceptions.

Originality/value

The paper offers a first large-scale, cross-industry investigation of how ESG metrics and reporting impact customer perceptions of social innovativeness, leading to a research agenda on communication of ESG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信