企业社会责任故事中的皱纹:快时尚服务品牌的企业社会责任声誉议程不匹配

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jacob Mickelsson, Joep J.G.M. van Haren, Jos G.A.M. Lemmink
{"title":"企业社会责任故事中的皱纹:快时尚服务品牌的企业社会责任声誉议程不匹配","authors":"Jacob Mickelsson, Joep J.G.M. van Haren, Jos G.A.M. Lemmink","doi":"10.1108/josm-07-2021-0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an increasingly important issue for service brands in fast fashion retailing, as consumers' negative impressions about retailers' CSR activities influence brand experience. Consumers' impressions of CSR efforts arise based on agendas communicated through many channels from different sources. The paper unravels the ‘wrinkles’, i.e. possible mismatches in CSR communication around service brands by studying differences between the three main sources of fast fashion brand-related CSR agendas: Autonomous company communication, news media and social media postings by consumers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors use structural topic modeling (STM) to analyze a corpus of texts focusing on the CSR efforts of three major fast fashion service brands over three years. The texts included 89 items of company communication (CSR reports and press releases), 5,351 news media articles about the brands' CSR efforts and 57,377 consumer generated tweets about the brands.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The STM analysis extracted 26 different CRS-related topics from the texts. Results showed differences in how much the three sources emphasized topics. The brands' own communication puts emphasis on environmental responsibility. News media tended to report on economic issues, treatment of employees and specific CSR-related events. Twitter showed more activity in discussing incident-based and emotionally charged topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The results feed into the ongoing discussion about how companies' CSR communication relates to communication in the press and among consumers. The authors highlight themes in the individual topics that are emphasized by the three sources, and discuss how CSR themes emerge in the overall transformative agenda.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The paper highlights how fast fashion service brands can identify and understand different CSR agendas arising around their brand. Insight into such agendas can be used to tailor the brands' communication strategies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper contributes to the understanding of the factors behind fashion service brands' CSR reputation, highlighting how the three main sources of CSR reputation (company reports, news and social media) emphasize different types of agendas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wrinkles in a CSR story: mismatched agendas in fast fashion service brands' CSR reputation\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Mickelsson, Joep J.G.M. van Haren, Jos G.A.M. Lemmink\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/josm-07-2021-0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an increasingly important issue for service brands in fast fashion retailing, as consumers' negative impressions about retailers' CSR activities influence brand experience. Consumers' impressions of CSR efforts arise based on agendas communicated through many channels from different sources. The paper unravels the ‘wrinkles’, i.e. possible mismatches in CSR communication around service brands by studying differences between the three main sources of fast fashion brand-related CSR agendas: Autonomous company communication, news media and social media postings by consumers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors use structural topic modeling (STM) to analyze a corpus of texts focusing on the CSR efforts of three major fast fashion service brands over three years. The texts included 89 items of company communication (CSR reports and press releases), 5,351 news media articles about the brands' CSR efforts and 57,377 consumer generated tweets about the brands.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The STM analysis extracted 26 different CRS-related topics from the texts. Results showed differences in how much the three sources emphasized topics. The brands' own communication puts emphasis on environmental responsibility. News media tended to report on economic issues, treatment of employees and specific CSR-related events. Twitter showed more activity in discussing incident-based and emotionally charged topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The results feed into the ongoing discussion about how companies' CSR communication relates to communication in the press and among consumers. The authors highlight themes in the individual topics that are emphasized by the three sources, and discuss how CSR themes emerge in the overall transformative agenda.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The paper highlights how fast fashion service brands can identify and understand different CSR agendas arising around their brand. Insight into such agendas can be used to tailor the brands' communication strategies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The paper contributes to the understanding of the factors behind fashion service brands' CSR reputation, highlighting how the three main sources of CSR reputation (company reports, news and social media) emphasize different types of agendas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Service Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Service Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-07-2021-0243\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-07-2021-0243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

企业社会责任(CSR)对于快时尚零售中的服务品牌来说是一个越来越重要的问题,因为消费者对零售商CSR活动的负面印象会影响品牌体验。消费者对企业社会责任的印象是基于不同渠道的议程而产生的。本文通过研究与快时尚品牌相关的社会责任议程的三个主要来源:自主公司传播、新闻媒体和消费者社交媒体发帖之间的差异,揭示了围绕服务品牌的社会责任传播中的“皱纹”,即可能存在的不匹配。设计/方法/方法作者使用结构主题建模(STM)来分析三个主要快时尚服务品牌三年来在企业社会责任方面的努力。这些文本包括89条公司传播(CSR报告和新闻稿),5351篇关于品牌CSR努力的新闻媒体文章和57377条消费者关于品牌的推文。STM分析从文本中提取了26个不同的crs相关主题。结果显示,三种来源在强调主题的程度上存在差异。品牌自身的传播强调环境责任。新闻媒体倾向于报道经济问题、员工待遇和具体的企业社会责任相关事件。推特在讨论基于事件和情绪化的话题方面表现出更多的活跃度。研究局限/启示研究结果为正在进行的关于企业社会责任传播如何与媒体和消费者之间的传播联系起来的讨论提供了依据。作者强调了三个来源强调的个别主题中的主题,并讨论了企业社会责任主题如何在整个变革议程中出现。本文重点介绍了快时尚服务品牌如何识别和理解围绕其品牌产生的不同CSR议程。对这些议程的洞察可以用来定制品牌的传播策略。本文有助于理解时尚服务品牌企业社会责任声誉背后的因素,突出了企业社会责任声誉的三个主要来源(公司报告、新闻和社交媒体)如何强调不同类型的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wrinkles in a CSR story: mismatched agendas in fast fashion service brands' CSR reputation

Purpose

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an increasingly important issue for service brands in fast fashion retailing, as consumers' negative impressions about retailers' CSR activities influence brand experience. Consumers' impressions of CSR efforts arise based on agendas communicated through many channels from different sources. The paper unravels the ‘wrinkles’, i.e. possible mismatches in CSR communication around service brands by studying differences between the three main sources of fast fashion brand-related CSR agendas: Autonomous company communication, news media and social media postings by consumers.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors use structural topic modeling (STM) to analyze a corpus of texts focusing on the CSR efforts of three major fast fashion service brands over three years. The texts included 89 items of company communication (CSR reports and press releases), 5,351 news media articles about the brands' CSR efforts and 57,377 consumer generated tweets about the brands.

Findings

The STM analysis extracted 26 different CRS-related topics from the texts. Results showed differences in how much the three sources emphasized topics. The brands' own communication puts emphasis on environmental responsibility. News media tended to report on economic issues, treatment of employees and specific CSR-related events. Twitter showed more activity in discussing incident-based and emotionally charged topics.

Research limitations/implications

The results feed into the ongoing discussion about how companies' CSR communication relates to communication in the press and among consumers. The authors highlight themes in the individual topics that are emphasized by the three sources, and discuss how CSR themes emerge in the overall transformative agenda.

Practical implications

The paper highlights how fast fashion service brands can identify and understand different CSR agendas arising around their brand. Insight into such agendas can be used to tailor the brands' communication strategies.

Originality/value

The paper contributes to the understanding of the factors behind fashion service brands' CSR reputation, highlighting how the three main sources of CSR reputation (company reports, news and social media) emphasize different types of agendas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信