木薯和绿豆粉混合小麦面包烘焙品质、功能和理化特性的评价

Francis C. Anosike, Okwuowulu R. Chinwendu, Nwigboji A. Nnaemeka, Mofunanya G. Nneka, Paul Inyang, Chinaka Ikechukwu, Onye-Chinedu C. Blessing, Gertrude N. Onyeji, Emeka C. Prince-Osuji
{"title":"木薯和绿豆粉混合小麦面包烘焙品质、功能和理化特性的评价","authors":"Francis C. Anosike,&nbsp;Okwuowulu R. Chinwendu,&nbsp;Nwigboji A. Nnaemeka,&nbsp;Mofunanya G. Nneka,&nbsp;Paul Inyang,&nbsp;Chinaka Ikechukwu,&nbsp;Onye-Chinedu C. Blessing,&nbsp;Gertrude N. Onyeji,&nbsp;Emeka C. Prince-Osuji","doi":"10.1002/fbe2.12060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study evaluated the baking qualities and physicochemical properties of bread produced from wheat flour supplemented with cassava and mung bean flour blends at different levels of inclusion to assess its suitability to be used in bread production. Standard methods were used to carry out the baking qualities and physicochemical properties of the flour blends while 20 semitrained panelists were recruited for the sensory evaluation. The result showed that the gluten content of the flour blends ranged from 3.61% to 24.19%. Sample A (90% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean) flour blend had the highest gluten content while sample D (60% wheat:20% cassava:20% mung bean) flour blend recorded the lowest value of gluten content. The viscosity of the flour blends was found to decrease significantly (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05<i>)</i> with an increase in temperature while the functional properties of the flour blends and physical properties of the bread varied among samples. Sample B (80% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean) was found to be highest in bulk density, loaf volume, and specific volume with values 0.73 g/mL, 7.86 cm<sup>3</sup>, and 0.05 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, respectively, with enhanced baking quality. Results of the chemical composition showed that fiber and protein content increased with an increase in substitution levels. Sample D had the highest value 0.43% and 27.65% while sample E (100% wheat) had the lowest value 0.38% and 12.60% for fiber and protein content respectively. Carbohydrate content decreased with an increase in substitution levels. Sample E had the highest value 48.88% while sample D had the lowest value 25.32%. Values for moisture, ash, fat, crude fiber, and energy content varied among samples and substitution levels. Sensory evaluation of the various attributes rated on 9 points hedonic scale showed a decrease in the mean score as the level of substitution increased. Sample E was rated high in all sensory attributes and was also found to be significantly different (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05) among samples although in general acceptability sample E was found to be the same as sample A. The result showed that bread made from 90% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean flour blend (sample A) compare favorably with bread made from 100% wheat flour (control) but in baking quality sample B was found to be the best.</p>","PeriodicalId":100544,"journal":{"name":"Food Bioengineering","volume":"2 3","pages":"264-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fbe2.12060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of baking qualities, functional and physicochemical properties of wheat supplemented with cassava and mung bean flour blends for bread making\",\"authors\":\"Francis C. Anosike,&nbsp;Okwuowulu R. Chinwendu,&nbsp;Nwigboji A. Nnaemeka,&nbsp;Mofunanya G. Nneka,&nbsp;Paul Inyang,&nbsp;Chinaka Ikechukwu,&nbsp;Onye-Chinedu C. Blessing,&nbsp;Gertrude N. Onyeji,&nbsp;Emeka C. Prince-Osuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fbe2.12060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present study evaluated the baking qualities and physicochemical properties of bread produced from wheat flour supplemented with cassava and mung bean flour blends at different levels of inclusion to assess its suitability to be used in bread production. Standard methods were used to carry out the baking qualities and physicochemical properties of the flour blends while 20 semitrained panelists were recruited for the sensory evaluation. The result showed that the gluten content of the flour blends ranged from 3.61% to 24.19%. Sample A (90% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean) flour blend had the highest gluten content while sample D (60% wheat:20% cassava:20% mung bean) flour blend recorded the lowest value of gluten content. The viscosity of the flour blends was found to decrease significantly (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05<i>)</i> with an increase in temperature while the functional properties of the flour blends and physical properties of the bread varied among samples. Sample B (80% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean) was found to be highest in bulk density, loaf volume, and specific volume with values 0.73 g/mL, 7.86 cm<sup>3</sup>, and 0.05 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, respectively, with enhanced baking quality. Results of the chemical composition showed that fiber and protein content increased with an increase in substitution levels. Sample D had the highest value 0.43% and 27.65% while sample E (100% wheat) had the lowest value 0.38% and 12.60% for fiber and protein content respectively. Carbohydrate content decreased with an increase in substitution levels. Sample E had the highest value 48.88% while sample D had the lowest value 25.32%. Values for moisture, ash, fat, crude fiber, and energy content varied among samples and substitution levels. Sensory evaluation of the various attributes rated on 9 points hedonic scale showed a decrease in the mean score as the level of substitution increased. Sample E was rated high in all sensory attributes and was also found to be significantly different (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05) among samples although in general acceptability sample E was found to be the same as sample A. The result showed that bread made from 90% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean flour blend (sample A) compare favorably with bread made from 100% wheat flour (control) but in baking quality sample B was found to be the best.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"264-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fbe2.12060\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fbe2.12060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fbe2.12060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了添加木薯和绿豆粉的小麦粉在不同包合水平下生产的面包的烘焙质量和理化性质,以评估其在面包生产中的适用性。采用标准方法对混合面粉的烘焙质量和理化性能进行了测试,同时招募了20名半训练小组成员进行感官评估。结果表明,混合面粉的面筋含量在3.61%至24.19%之间。样品A(90%小麦:5%木薯:5%绿豆)的面筋含量最高,而样品D(60%小麦:20%木薯:20%绿豆)的麸质含量最低。发现面粉混合物的粘度显著降低(p ≥ 0.05),而面粉混合物的功能特性和面包的物理特性在样品之间变化。样品B(80%小麦:5%木薯:5%绿豆)的体积密度、面包体积和比体积最高,值为0.73 g/mL,7.86 cm3和0.05 cm3/g,具有增强的烘焙质量。化学组成的结果表明,纤维和蛋白质的含量随着取代水平的增加而增加。样品D的纤维和蛋白质含量最高,分别为0.43%和27.65%,而样品E(100%小麦)的纤维和蛋白含量最低,分别为0.38%和12.60%。碳水化合物含量随着取代水平的增加而降低。样品E的最高值为48.88%,而样品D的最低值为25.32%。水分、灰分、脂肪、粗纤维和能量含量的值因样品和替代水平而异。在9分享乐量表上对各种属性进行的感官评估显示,随着替代水平的提高,平均得分有所下降。样品E在所有感官属性中都被评为高,并且也被发现有显著差异(p ≥ 0.05),尽管在一般可接受性中发现样品E与样品A相同。结果表明,由90%小麦:5%木薯:5%绿豆粉混合物(样品A)制成的面包与由100%小麦粉制成的面包(对照)相比是有利的,但在烘焙质量方面发现样品B是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of baking qualities, functional and physicochemical properties of wheat supplemented with cassava and mung bean flour blends for bread making

Evaluation of baking qualities, functional and physicochemical properties of wheat supplemented with cassava and mung bean flour blends for bread making

The present study evaluated the baking qualities and physicochemical properties of bread produced from wheat flour supplemented with cassava and mung bean flour blends at different levels of inclusion to assess its suitability to be used in bread production. Standard methods were used to carry out the baking qualities and physicochemical properties of the flour blends while 20 semitrained panelists were recruited for the sensory evaluation. The result showed that the gluten content of the flour blends ranged from 3.61% to 24.19%. Sample A (90% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean) flour blend had the highest gluten content while sample D (60% wheat:20% cassava:20% mung bean) flour blend recorded the lowest value of gluten content. The viscosity of the flour blends was found to decrease significantly (p ≥ 0.05) with an increase in temperature while the functional properties of the flour blends and physical properties of the bread varied among samples. Sample B (80% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean) was found to be highest in bulk density, loaf volume, and specific volume with values 0.73 g/mL, 7.86 cm3, and 0.05 cm3/g, respectively, with enhanced baking quality. Results of the chemical composition showed that fiber and protein content increased with an increase in substitution levels. Sample D had the highest value 0.43% and 27.65% while sample E (100% wheat) had the lowest value 0.38% and 12.60% for fiber and protein content respectively. Carbohydrate content decreased with an increase in substitution levels. Sample E had the highest value 48.88% while sample D had the lowest value 25.32%. Values for moisture, ash, fat, crude fiber, and energy content varied among samples and substitution levels. Sensory evaluation of the various attributes rated on 9 points hedonic scale showed a decrease in the mean score as the level of substitution increased. Sample E was rated high in all sensory attributes and was also found to be significantly different (p ≥ 0.05) among samples although in general acceptability sample E was found to be the same as sample A. The result showed that bread made from 90% wheat:5% cassava:5% mung bean flour blend (sample A) compare favorably with bread made from 100% wheat flour (control) but in baking quality sample B was found to be the best.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信