混合种族,维持种族主义?考虑跨种族家庭、社会距离和种族不平等之间的联系

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Jenifer L. Bratter, Mary E. Campbell
{"title":"混合种族,维持种族主义?考虑跨种族家庭、社会距离和种族不平等之间的联系","authors":"Jenifer L. Bratter,&nbsp;Mary E. Campbell","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Researchers often assume that close interracial relationships, especially intermarriage, simultaneously <i>reflect</i> and <i>cause</i> a weakening of racial and ethnic boundaries and inequality between groups. In fact, interracial marriage is often used as a measure of social distance. We question those assumptions, noting the salient boundaries and durable inequalities that remain despite decades of increases in interracial relationships. We begin with historical examples, showing how, for much of US history, there was no expectation that interracial sexual encounters would reduce racial inequality or weaken boundaries. Incorporating critical race theory and intersectional perspectives, we describe how the impact of interracial intimate relationships is both gendered and classed. We argue that research on contemporary intimate interracial relationships (friendships, dating, and marriage) explains why such relationships may have little impact on attitudes, inequality, and the rigidity of boundaries and call for future research to consider dynamics <i>within</i> the family as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"15 2","pages":"332-351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixing races, maintaining racism? Considering the connection between interracial families, social distance, and racial inequality\",\"authors\":\"Jenifer L. Bratter,&nbsp;Mary E. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jftr.12504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Researchers often assume that close interracial relationships, especially intermarriage, simultaneously <i>reflect</i> and <i>cause</i> a weakening of racial and ethnic boundaries and inequality between groups. In fact, interracial marriage is often used as a measure of social distance. We question those assumptions, noting the salient boundaries and durable inequalities that remain despite decades of increases in interracial relationships. We begin with historical examples, showing how, for much of US history, there was no expectation that interracial sexual encounters would reduce racial inequality or weaken boundaries. Incorporating critical race theory and intersectional perspectives, we describe how the impact of interracial intimate relationships is both gendered and classed. We argue that research on contemporary intimate interracial relationships (friendships, dating, and marriage) explains why such relationships may have little impact on attitudes, inequality, and the rigidity of boundaries and call for future research to consider dynamics <i>within</i> the family as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"332-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12504\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究人员经常认为,密切的种族间关系,特别是通婚,同时反映并导致种族和民族界限的削弱以及群体之间的不平等。事实上,跨种族婚姻经常被用来衡量社会距离。我们质疑这些假设,注意到尽管几十年来种族间关系有所增加,但仍存在显著的界限和持久的不平等。我们从历史例子开始,展示了在美国历史的大部分时间里,人们并不期望跨种族的性接触会减少种族不平等或削弱边界。结合批判性种族理论和交叉视角,我们描述了跨种族亲密关系的影响是如何被性别化和分类的。我们认为,对当代亲密的跨种族关系(友谊、约会和婚姻)的研究解释了为什么这种关系可能对态度、不平等和界限的刚性几乎没有影响,并呼吁未来的研究也要考虑家庭内部的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixing races, maintaining racism? Considering the connection between interracial families, social distance, and racial inequality

Researchers often assume that close interracial relationships, especially intermarriage, simultaneously reflect and cause a weakening of racial and ethnic boundaries and inequality between groups. In fact, interracial marriage is often used as a measure of social distance. We question those assumptions, noting the salient boundaries and durable inequalities that remain despite decades of increases in interracial relationships. We begin with historical examples, showing how, for much of US history, there was no expectation that interracial sexual encounters would reduce racial inequality or weaken boundaries. Incorporating critical race theory and intersectional perspectives, we describe how the impact of interracial intimate relationships is both gendered and classed. We argue that research on contemporary intimate interracial relationships (friendships, dating, and marriage) explains why such relationships may have little impact on attitudes, inequality, and the rigidity of boundaries and call for future research to consider dynamics within the family as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信