将合作设计实践理解为“做得好”的过程

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 0 ART
Aaron Davis, Michelle Tuckey, Ian Gwilt, Niki Wallace
{"title":"将合作设计实践理解为“做得好”的过程","authors":"Aaron Davis,&nbsp;Michelle Tuckey,&nbsp;Ian Gwilt,&nbsp;Niki Wallace","doi":"10.1111/jade.12459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Co-design and other associated design approaches often deploy creative and making approaches in facilitating collaborative practices. In a therapeutic setting, engagement in creative and making activities have been associated with improvements in people's well-being, yet when deploying these as part of co-design practices, these outcomes are often overlooked. This paper presents the results from a series of workshops that focused on the well-being benefits of participating in co-design practices. The research uses Max-Neef's (1991). Theory of Needs to explore how innate human needs might be satisfied through participation in co-design practices, and demonstrates how this framework might be used for planning and evaluating co-design practices through a wellbeing lens. Finally, it suggests that future generations of design practitioners would benefit from exposure to the consideration of co-design as a process of “welldoing.”</p>","PeriodicalId":45973,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Art & Design Education","volume":"42 2","pages":"278-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jade.12459","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Co-Design Practice as a Process of “Welldoing”\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Davis,&nbsp;Michelle Tuckey,&nbsp;Ian Gwilt,&nbsp;Niki Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jade.12459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Co-design and other associated design approaches often deploy creative and making approaches in facilitating collaborative practices. In a therapeutic setting, engagement in creative and making activities have been associated with improvements in people's well-being, yet when deploying these as part of co-design practices, these outcomes are often overlooked. This paper presents the results from a series of workshops that focused on the well-being benefits of participating in co-design practices. The research uses Max-Neef's (1991). Theory of Needs to explore how innate human needs might be satisfied through participation in co-design practices, and demonstrates how this framework might be used for planning and evaluating co-design practices through a wellbeing lens. Finally, it suggests that future generations of design practitioners would benefit from exposure to the consideration of co-design as a process of “welldoing.”</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Art & Design Education\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"278-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jade.12459\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Art & Design Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jade.12459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Art & Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jade.12459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联合设计和其他相关设计方法通常采用创造性和制造方法来促进合作实践。在治疗环境中,参与创意和制作活动与改善人们的福祉有关,但当将这些活动作为共同设计实践的一部分时,这些结果往往被忽视。本文介绍了一系列研讨会的结果,这些研讨会侧重于参与共同设计实践的福利。这项研究使用了马克斯·尼夫(1991)的研究。需求理论,探索如何通过参与共同设计实践来满足人类的内在需求,并展示如何通过健康视角将该框架用于规划和评估共同设计实践。最后,它表明,未来几代的设计从业者将受益于将共同设计视为一个“做得好”的过程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding Co-Design Practice as a Process of “Welldoing”

Understanding Co-Design Practice as a Process of “Welldoing”

Co-design and other associated design approaches often deploy creative and making approaches in facilitating collaborative practices. In a therapeutic setting, engagement in creative and making activities have been associated with improvements in people's well-being, yet when deploying these as part of co-design practices, these outcomes are often overlooked. This paper presents the results from a series of workshops that focused on the well-being benefits of participating in co-design practices. The research uses Max-Neef's (1991). Theory of Needs to explore how innate human needs might be satisfied through participation in co-design practices, and demonstrates how this framework might be used for planning and evaluating co-design practices through a wellbeing lens. Finally, it suggests that future generations of design practitioners would benefit from exposure to the consideration of co-design as a process of “welldoing.”

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Art & Design Education (iJADE) provides an international forum for research in the field of the art and creative education. It is the primary source for the dissemination of independently refereed articles about the visual arts, creativity, crafts, design, and art history, in all aspects, phases and types of education contexts and learning situations. The journal welcomes articles from a wide range of theoretical and methodological approaches to research, and encourages submissions from the broader fields of education and the arts that are concerned with learning through art and creative education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信