低代码平台的可用性如何?系统的文献综述

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Daniel Pinho , Ademar Aguiar , Vasco Amaral
{"title":"低代码平台的可用性如何?系统的文献综述","authors":"Daniel Pinho ,&nbsp;Ademar Aguiar ,&nbsp;Vasco Amaral","doi":"10.1016/j.cola.2022.101185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Low-code development is a concept whose presence has grown both in academia and the software industry and is discussed alongside others, such as model-driven engineering and domain-specific languages. Usability is an important concept in low-code contexts since users of these tools often lack a background in programming. Grey literature articles have also stated that low-code tools have high usability.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>This paper examines the current literature about low-code and no-code to discover more about them and their relationship with usability, particularly its quality, which factors are the most relevant, and how users view these tools. This focus on usability aims to provide a different point of view from other works on low-code.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>We performed a systematic literature review based on a formal protocol for this study. The search protocol returned a total of 207 peer-review articles across five databases, which was supplemented with a snowballing process. These were filtered using inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 38 relevant articles that were analysed, synthesised and reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Despite growing interest and a strong enterprise presence in academia, we did not find a formal definition of low-code, although common characteristics have been specified. We found that users have a heightened awareness of usability regarding low-code tools, with some authors performing feasibility studies on their implementations or listing factors that influence the user experience in a given tool. Researchers are considering usability factors unconsciously, and the low-code field would grow if research on usability increased. This paper also suggests a definition for low-code development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Languages","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What about the usability in low-code platforms? A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Pinho ,&nbsp;Ademar Aguiar ,&nbsp;Vasco Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cola.2022.101185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Low-code development is a concept whose presence has grown both in academia and the software industry and is discussed alongside others, such as model-driven engineering and domain-specific languages. Usability is an important concept in low-code contexts since users of these tools often lack a background in programming. Grey literature articles have also stated that low-code tools have high usability.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>This paper examines the current literature about low-code and no-code to discover more about them and their relationship with usability, particularly its quality, which factors are the most relevant, and how users view these tools. This focus on usability aims to provide a different point of view from other works on low-code.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>We performed a systematic literature review based on a formal protocol for this study. The search protocol returned a total of 207 peer-review articles across five databases, which was supplemented with a snowballing process. These were filtered using inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 38 relevant articles that were analysed, synthesised and reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Despite growing interest and a strong enterprise presence in academia, we did not find a formal definition of low-code, although common characteristics have been specified. We found that users have a heightened awareness of usability regarding low-code tools, with some authors performing feasibility studies on their implementations or listing factors that influence the user experience in a given tool. Researchers are considering usability factors unconsciously, and the low-code field would grow if research on usability increased. This paper also suggests a definition for low-code development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Languages\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259011842200082X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Languages","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259011842200082X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:低代码开发是一个概念,它在学术界和软件行业都有发展,并与其他概念一起讨论,如模型驱动的工程和特定领域的语言。在低代码环境中,可用性是一个重要的概念,因为这些工具的用户通常缺乏编程背景。灰色文献文章也指出,低代码工具具有很高的可用性。目的:本文研究了当前关于低代码和无代码的文献,以了解更多关于它们及其与可用性的关系,特别是其质量,哪些因素最相关,以及用户如何看待这些工具。这种对可用性的关注旨在提供一种不同于其他低代码工作的观点。方法:我们根据本研究的正式协议进行了系统的文献综述。搜索协议在五个数据库中总共返回了207篇同行评审文章,并辅以滚雪球过程。使用纳入和排除标准对这些文章进行筛选,得到38篇相关文章进行分析、综合和报道。结论:尽管学术界对低代码的兴趣越来越大,企业界也有很强的影响力,但我们没有找到低代码的正式定义,尽管已经指定了常见的特征。我们发现,用户对低代码工具的可用性有了更高的认识,一些作者对其实现进行了可行性研究,或者列出了影响给定工具中用户体验的因素。研究人员正在无意识地考虑可用性因素,如果对可用性的研究增加,低代码领域就会扩大。本文还提出了低代码开发的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What about the usability in low-code platforms? A systematic literature review

Context:

Low-code development is a concept whose presence has grown both in academia and the software industry and is discussed alongside others, such as model-driven engineering and domain-specific languages. Usability is an important concept in low-code contexts since users of these tools often lack a background in programming. Grey literature articles have also stated that low-code tools have high usability.

Objective:

This paper examines the current literature about low-code and no-code to discover more about them and their relationship with usability, particularly its quality, which factors are the most relevant, and how users view these tools. This focus on usability aims to provide a different point of view from other works on low-code.

Method:

We performed a systematic literature review based on a formal protocol for this study. The search protocol returned a total of 207 peer-review articles across five databases, which was supplemented with a snowballing process. These were filtered using inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 38 relevant articles that were analysed, synthesised and reported.

Conclusion:

Despite growing interest and a strong enterprise presence in academia, we did not find a formal definition of low-code, although common characteristics have been specified. We found that users have a heightened awareness of usability regarding low-code tools, with some authors performing feasibility studies on their implementations or listing factors that influence the user experience in a given tool. Researchers are considering usability factors unconsciously, and the low-code field would grow if research on usability increased. This paper also suggests a definition for low-code development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Languages
Journal of Computer Languages Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信