David J.H. Cant , Benjamen P. Reed , Ben F. Spencer , Wendy R. Flavell , Alexander G. Shard
{"title":"魔角HAXPES","authors":"David J.H. Cant , Benjamen P. Reed , Ben F. Spencer , Wendy R. Flavell , Alexander G. Shard","doi":"10.1016/j.elspec.2023.147311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The use of higher energy X-ray sources for photoelectron spectroscopy is receiving considerable attention due to the increased availability of laboratory-based instrumentation and an improved insight into the structures and </span>interfacial properties<span> of technological materials. In traditional X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy the design of the instrument often compensates for anisotropy in photoelectron emission through consideration of the angles between the X-ray source and the electron analyser. X-ray polarisation and non-dipole effects in </span></span>photoemission<span> are usually assumed to be negligible. However, for high energy XPS (HAXPES) both may be significant. Polarisation at synchrotron<span> sources is an important consideration and non-dipole effects are generally more significant at higher photon energies. In this article we demonstrate that, for certain polarisations, ‘magic angle’ geometries exist that minimise the effects of both dipole and non-dipole contributions in photoemission. However, it is not possible to find such geometries for unpolarised X-rays; achieving a ‘magic angle’ geometry in HAXPES requires the X-rays to have a degree of linear polarisation of 1/3 or greater.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":15726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 147311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magic angle HAXPES\",\"authors\":\"David J.H. Cant , Benjamen P. Reed , Ben F. Spencer , Wendy R. Flavell , Alexander G. Shard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elspec.2023.147311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The use of higher energy X-ray sources for photoelectron spectroscopy is receiving considerable attention due to the increased availability of laboratory-based instrumentation and an improved insight into the structures and </span>interfacial properties<span> of technological materials. In traditional X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy the design of the instrument often compensates for anisotropy in photoelectron emission through consideration of the angles between the X-ray source and the electron analyser. X-ray polarisation and non-dipole effects in </span></span>photoemission<span> are usually assumed to be negligible. However, for high energy XPS (HAXPES) both may be significant. Polarisation at synchrotron<span> sources is an important consideration and non-dipole effects are generally more significant at higher photon energies. In this article we demonstrate that, for certain polarisations, ‘magic angle’ geometries exist that minimise the effects of both dipole and non-dipole contributions in photoemission. However, it is not possible to find such geometries for unpolarised X-rays; achieving a ‘magic angle’ geometry in HAXPES requires the X-rays to have a degree of linear polarisation of 1/3 or greater.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"264 \",\"pages\":\"Article 147311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204823000282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPECTROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204823000282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of higher energy X-ray sources for photoelectron spectroscopy is receiving considerable attention due to the increased availability of laboratory-based instrumentation and an improved insight into the structures and interfacial properties of technological materials. In traditional X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy the design of the instrument often compensates for anisotropy in photoelectron emission through consideration of the angles between the X-ray source and the electron analyser. X-ray polarisation and non-dipole effects in photoemission are usually assumed to be negligible. However, for high energy XPS (HAXPES) both may be significant. Polarisation at synchrotron sources is an important consideration and non-dipole effects are generally more significant at higher photon energies. In this article we demonstrate that, for certain polarisations, ‘magic angle’ geometries exist that minimise the effects of both dipole and non-dipole contributions in photoemission. However, it is not possible to find such geometries for unpolarised X-rays; achieving a ‘magic angle’ geometry in HAXPES requires the X-rays to have a degree of linear polarisation of 1/3 or greater.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena publishes experimental, theoretical and applied work in the field of electron spectroscopy and electronic structure, involving techniques which use high energy photons (>10 eV) or electrons as probes or detected particles in the investigation.