了解并减少延迟处方情况下不适当的抗生素使用。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1037/hea0001323
Ana Paula Santana, Lars Korn, Cornelia Betsch, Eva M Krockow, Elisabeth D C Sievert, Marina Gross, Maxine Pepper, Robert Böhm
{"title":"了解并减少延迟处方情况下不适当的抗生素使用。","authors":"Ana Paula Santana, Lars Korn, Cornelia Betsch, Eva M Krockow, Elisabeth D C Sievert, Marina Gross, Maxine Pepper, Robert Böhm","doi":"10.1037/hea0001323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance is a global health threat perpetuated by the overprescribing of antibiotics in primary care. One strategy to reduce antibiotic use in this setting is delayed prescribing. However, several psychological factors might undermine its effectiveness. The aim of the study was to test whether different interventions aiming at helping patients to manage diagnostic uncertainty in the period of watchful waiting promote appropriate antibiotic use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a preregistered online experiment (<i>N</i> = 690 adult participants from the United Kingdom) in which we modeled delayed prescription in a decision task with behavior-contingent incentives. Participants had either a fictional viral or bacterial infection and received interventions that aimed at facilitating symptom monitoring (i.e., passive monitoring) and engaging participants in the task (i.e., active monitoring).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions decreased antibiotic use when the disease was viral. Active monitoring was more efficient in decreasing antibiotic use than passive monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings have practical implications for managing uncertainty and fostering appropriate antibiotic use in delayed prescribing situations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding and reducing inappropriate antibiotic use in the context of delayed prescriptions.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Santana, Lars Korn, Cornelia Betsch, Eva M Krockow, Elisabeth D C Sievert, Marina Gross, Maxine Pepper, Robert Böhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance is a global health threat perpetuated by the overprescribing of antibiotics in primary care. One strategy to reduce antibiotic use in this setting is delayed prescribing. However, several psychological factors might undermine its effectiveness. The aim of the study was to test whether different interventions aiming at helping patients to manage diagnostic uncertainty in the period of watchful waiting promote appropriate antibiotic use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a preregistered online experiment (<i>N</i> = 690 adult participants from the United Kingdom) in which we modeled delayed prescription in a decision task with behavior-contingent incentives. Participants had either a fictional viral or bacterial infection and received interventions that aimed at facilitating symptom monitoring (i.e., passive monitoring) and engaging participants in the task (i.e., active monitoring).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions decreased antibiotic use when the disease was viral. Active monitoring was more efficient in decreasing antibiotic use than passive monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings have practical implications for managing uncertainty and fostering appropriate antibiotic use in delayed prescribing situations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于初级保健中抗生素的过量使用,抗微生物耐药性是一个全球性的健康威胁。在这种情况下,减少抗生素使用的一种策略是延迟开药。然而,一些心理因素可能会削弱其有效性。该研究的目的是测试旨在帮助患者在警惕等待期间管理诊断不确定性的不同干预措施是否能促进适当的抗生素使用。方法:我们进行了一项预先注册的在线实验(来自英国的690名成年参与者),在该实验中,我们在具有行为相关激励的决策任务中对延迟处方进行了建模。参与者感染了虚构的病毒或细菌,并接受了旨在促进症状监测(即被动监测)和让参与者参与任务(即主动监测)的干预措施。结果:当疾病为病毒性时,两种干预措施都减少了抗生素的使用。主动监测在减少抗生素使用方面比被动监测更有效。结论:研究结果对管理不确定性和促进延迟处方情况下适当使用抗生素具有实际意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding and reducing inappropriate antibiotic use in the context of delayed prescriptions.

Objective: Antimicrobial resistance is a global health threat perpetuated by the overprescribing of antibiotics in primary care. One strategy to reduce antibiotic use in this setting is delayed prescribing. However, several psychological factors might undermine its effectiveness. The aim of the study was to test whether different interventions aiming at helping patients to manage diagnostic uncertainty in the period of watchful waiting promote appropriate antibiotic use.

Method: We conducted a preregistered online experiment (N = 690 adult participants from the United Kingdom) in which we modeled delayed prescription in a decision task with behavior-contingent incentives. Participants had either a fictional viral or bacterial infection and received interventions that aimed at facilitating symptom monitoring (i.e., passive monitoring) and engaging participants in the task (i.e., active monitoring).

Results: Both interventions decreased antibiotic use when the disease was viral. Active monitoring was more efficient in decreasing antibiotic use than passive monitoring.

Conclusions: The findings have practical implications for managing uncertainty and fostering appropriate antibiotic use in delayed prescribing situations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信