腰椎脆性骨折引起的神经系统症状患者的三级腰外侧融合术。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2023-12-15 Epub Date: 2023-10-18 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0064
Yoshitaka Nagashima, Yusuke Nishimura, Tokumi Kanemura, Nobuhiro Hata, Kotaro Satake, Sho Akahori, Motonori Ishii, Takafumi Tanei, Masakazu Takayasu, Ryuta Saito
{"title":"腰椎脆性骨折引起的神经系统症状患者的三级腰外侧融合术。","authors":"Yoshitaka Nagashima, Yusuke Nishimura, Tokumi Kanemura, Nobuhiro Hata, Kotaro Satake, Sho Akahori, Motonori Ishii, Takafumi Tanei, Masakazu Takayasu, Ryuta Saito","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a lack of agreement on whether minimally invasive lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion (LLIF) is a suitable treatment option for vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs). Hence, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LLIF in the management of VFF with neurological deficits in the lumbar spine. Between April 2015 and March 2020, we conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with VFF treated with three-level or less LLIF. The participants had previously received conservative treatment but had not been able to control their neurological symptoms. To assess the outcomes of the LLIF procedures, the patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. Clinical and radiological results, which include the timing and location of the bony fusion, were analyzed. The study involved 19 patients with 23 vertebral fracture levels. The residual height of the fractured vertebra was found to be 57.0 ± 12.3% of the height of the adjacent level. The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association score significantly improved postoperatively. Postoperative radiological parameters were significantly maintained at 1 year, and lumbar lordosis was maintained at the last follow-up (45.0 ± 26.7). In total 31 LLIF levels, bone fusion was observed in four levels at 6 months postoperatively, in 16 levels at 1 year, and in 23 levels at the last follow-up. The facet joint had the highest bony fusion location. LLIF within three levels can be safely performed in certain VFF cases with sufficient residual vertebral height.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"548-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion within Three-level for Patients with Neurological Symptoms due to Vertebral Fragility Fractures in the Lumbar Spine.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshitaka Nagashima, Yusuke Nishimura, Tokumi Kanemura, Nobuhiro Hata, Kotaro Satake, Sho Akahori, Motonori Ishii, Takafumi Tanei, Masakazu Takayasu, Ryuta Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a lack of agreement on whether minimally invasive lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion (LLIF) is a suitable treatment option for vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs). Hence, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LLIF in the management of VFF with neurological deficits in the lumbar spine. Between April 2015 and March 2020, we conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with VFF treated with three-level or less LLIF. The participants had previously received conservative treatment but had not been able to control their neurological symptoms. To assess the outcomes of the LLIF procedures, the patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. Clinical and radiological results, which include the timing and location of the bony fusion, were analyzed. The study involved 19 patients with 23 vertebral fracture levels. The residual height of the fractured vertebra was found to be 57.0 ± 12.3% of the height of the adjacent level. The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association score significantly improved postoperatively. Postoperative radiological parameters were significantly maintained at 1 year, and lumbar lordosis was maintained at the last follow-up (45.0 ± 26.7). In total 31 LLIF levels, bone fusion was observed in four levels at 6 months postoperatively, in 16 levels at 1 year, and in 23 levels at the last follow-up. The facet joint had the highest bony fusion location. LLIF within three levels can be safely performed in certain VFF cases with sufficient residual vertebral height.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"548-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788486/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于微创外侧腰椎间融合术(LLIF)是否是治疗椎体脆性骨折(VFF)的合适选择,目前还缺乏一致意见。因此,我们试图评估LLIF治疗伴有腰椎神经功能缺损的VFF的疗效和安全性。2015年4月至2020年3月,我们对接受三级或更低LLIF治疗的VFF患者进行了一项回顾性观察性研究。参与者之前接受过保守治疗,但未能控制他们的神经症状。为了评估LLIF手术的结果,对患者进行了至少1年的随访。分析了临床和放射学结果,包括骨融合的时间和位置。这项研究涉及19名患者,共有23个脊椎骨折级别。骨折椎体的残余高度为相邻椎体高度的57.0±12.3%。日本骨科协会的平均评分在术后显著改善。术后放射学参数在1年时得到显著维持,腰椎前凸在最后一次随访时得到维持(45.0±26.7)。在总共31个LLIF水平中,术后6个月观察到4个水平的骨融合,1年观察到16个水平的融合,最后一次访问时观察到23个水平的骨折融合。小关节的骨融合位置最高。三个级别内的LLIF可以在某些VFF病例中安全地进行,这些病例具有足够的残余椎骨高度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion within Three-level for Patients with Neurological Symptoms due to Vertebral Fragility Fractures in the Lumbar Spine.

There is a lack of agreement on whether minimally invasive lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion (LLIF) is a suitable treatment option for vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs). Hence, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LLIF in the management of VFF with neurological deficits in the lumbar spine. Between April 2015 and March 2020, we conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with VFF treated with three-level or less LLIF. The participants had previously received conservative treatment but had not been able to control their neurological symptoms. To assess the outcomes of the LLIF procedures, the patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. Clinical and radiological results, which include the timing and location of the bony fusion, were analyzed. The study involved 19 patients with 23 vertebral fracture levels. The residual height of the fractured vertebra was found to be 57.0 ± 12.3% of the height of the adjacent level. The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association score significantly improved postoperatively. Postoperative radiological parameters were significantly maintained at 1 year, and lumbar lordosis was maintained at the last follow-up (45.0 ± 26.7). In total 31 LLIF levels, bone fusion was observed in four levels at 6 months postoperatively, in 16 levels at 1 year, and in 23 levels at the last follow-up. The facet joint had the highest bony fusion location. LLIF within three levels can be safely performed in certain VFF cases with sufficient residual vertebral height.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信